Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 36
Filter
1.
J Neurol ; 2024 Apr 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38578494

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The risk of hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation remains unclear in people with multiple sclerosis (MS) receiving ocrelizumab. We aimed to assess HBV seroprevalence and reactivation risk in MS patients on ocrelizumab and to evaluate the effectiveness of antiviral prophylaxis against HBV reactivation. METHODS: In this single-center, cross-sectional study, 400 people with MS receiving ocrelizumab were screened for HBV at baseline and antiviral prophylaxis was implemented based on serological results. Patients were monitored for HBV reactivation, and outcomes were analyzed. RESULTS: Among 56 (14%) patients who had serology compatible with occult or resolved HBV infection, 49 (85.7%) received antiviral prophylaxis regularly and had no HBV reactivation during the follow-up. Reactivation of HBV occurred in 2 out of 7 (28.6%) patients who did not receive antiviral prophylaxis and in one patient who did not adhere to the prophylaxis regimen. All patients with reactivation had anti-HBs levels below 100 mIU/mL and the median titer was significantly lower than the patients with no HBV reactivation (p = 0.034). CONCLUSION: This study highlights a 14% anti-HBc positivity, indicating a potential risk for HBV reactivation in people with MS receiving ocrelizumab. This suggests the importance of vigilant monitoring and the implementation of prophylactic measures. Our recommendation emphasizes antiviral prophylaxis, particularly for patients with low anti-HBs, and a pre-emptive strategy for others.

2.
Adv Clin Exp Med ; 2023 Dec 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38062656

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Although there is limited data about the role of infectious diseases and clinical microbiology (IDCM) consultations in the Emergency Department (ED), they have a key role in deciding on hospitalization and appropriate use of antibiotics. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate demographic and clinical characteristics of patients who visited the ED of our hospital and underwent an IDCM consultation. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, we reviewed the medical records of adult patients who visited the ED of our hospital between May and August 2021 and needed IDCM consultation. The demographic data, the date and time of admission and consultation, the departments that were consulted before IDCM, laboratory results, diagnosis, and outcome were recorded. RESULTS: Out of 42,116 ED visits, 1,007 (2.4%) IDCM consultations were requested. The median time between admission and IDCM consultation was 239 min (150.0-373.5). Before 56.9% of IDCM consultations, pre-consultations were requested from other departments, and the time interval was significantly longer. The median age of patients was 68 years (51-77 years). Infections were confirmed by the IDCM physician in 79.6% of the consultations. The most diagnosed infections were urinary tract infections (32.4%), skin-soft tissue infections (16.9%) and lower respiratory tract infections (10.3%), whereas 9.3% of the consultations resulted in hospitalization to the infection ward, 25.1% to other wards, and 5% to the intensive care unit (ICU). CONCLUSIONS: Two of 3 consultations resulted in hospitalization in other wards, and this shows that IDCM consultations are beneficial for managing patients with infectious diseases hospitalized in other departments. Communication between IDCM specialists and ED colleagues is important, especially in the management of elderly patients who require a multidisciplinary approach.

3.
J Mycol Med ; 33(3): 101382, 2023 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37060850

ABSTRACT

Although Fusarium spp. rarely cause infections in healthy people, they can cause fusariosis, particularly in neutropenic hematological malignancies, bone marrow transplant patients, and immunocompromised patients, such as those with acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS), and rarely in solid organ transplant recipients. Here, we present a case of a liver transplant recipient with F. solani species complex (FSSC) infection treated with posaconazole. A 61-year-old man presented with multiple itchy, painful, palpable, irregular, subcutaneous nodules on the right leg and total dystrophic onychomycosis in the right toenails. Incisional skin biopsies of the lesions were performed, and the samples were sent to the pathology and mycology laboratories for analysis. The clinical isolate was identified as FSSC using phenotypic, matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry, and genotypic methods. Liposomal amphotericin B could not be administered owing to the development of side effects; hence, the patient was treated with posaconazole for 4 months. While some nodular lesions disappeared completely under this treatment, the others showed dimensional regression. This is the first case of FSSC infection with skin and nail involvement in a non-neutropenic, liver transplant patient in Turkey. Fusariosis may develop with rare species, such as FSSC, as first reported in this case of a liver transplant patient. Regardless of the species, amphotericin B is the first choice for treating fusariosis; however, posaconazole is an effective and safe alternative to amphotericin B.


Subject(s)
Fusariosis , Fusarium , Liver Transplantation , Male , Humans , Middle Aged , Fusariosis/diagnosis , Fusariosis/drug therapy , Amphotericin B/therapeutic use , Antifungal Agents/therapeutic use
4.
Transplant Proc ; 55(5): 1223-1225, 2023 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37087296

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: We aimed to examine the comorbidity, disease progress, and vaccination status of liver transplant patients followed up in our hospital who had COVID-19. METHODS: Liver transplant patients with COVID-19 were included between 11 March 2020 and 15 September 2022. Demographic data, disease progress, and COVID-19 vaccines were recorded. The SPSS 24.0 (IBM SPSS, Inc, Armonk, NY, United States) program was used for analysis. The data were analyzed using the χ2 test. P values < .05 were considered clinically significant. RESULTS: Sixteen SARS-CoV-2 polymerase chain reaction (+) patients were detected. Twelve (75.0%) patients were male; the mean age was 49.56 ± 14.0 years (24-76 years). The mean transplant time was 156.69 ± 54.05 months. Four (25.0%) of the 5 (31.3%) patients with comorbidities had hypertension, and 1 (6.3%) had diabetes. None of the patients had an underlying lung disease. All the patients received immunosuppressive therapy, and the most common combination was antimetabolite and calcineurin inhibitor (9 patients [69.2%]). Nine patients (56.3%) had a fever, whereas 6 (37.5%) had respiratory symptoms. Two (33.3%) had pneumonia. Five (31.4%) patients were hospitalized, and 1 (20%) was admitted to the intensive care unit due to non-invasive mechanical ventilation needs. No patient died due to COVID-19. A statistically significant correlation was found between the presence of fever, respiratory symptoms, and hospitalization (P < .05). Of those vaccinated, 10 (66.7%) were infected before the COVID-19 vaccination. CONCLUSIONS: The course of COVID-19 in liver recipients without any underlying disease other than transplantation is not different from that in the healthy population. Immunosuppressive therapy was continued in patients with the disease, and two-thirds did not require hospitalization.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Liver Transplantation , Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , COVID-19 Vaccines/administration & dosage , Hospitals, University , Liver Transplantation/adverse effects , SARS-CoV-2 , Transplant Recipients
5.
Ir J Med Sci ; 192(1): 263-268, 2023 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35829907

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Due to elderly residents, nursing homes/assisted living facilities were the most affected places in COVID-19 pandemic. Besides symptomatic patients, asymptomatic patients were detected during routine screening. AIM: This study aims to determine the factors that affect antibody response and viral shedding in stool samples after natural exposure to the virus in residents and staff who recovered from COVID-19 before the vaccine was available. METHODS: This prospective cross-sectional study was conducted at the nation's highest-capacity Residential and Nursing Home. Blood samples were collected between December 15, 2020 and January 15, 2021 from participating residents and staff for anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody testing. Stool samples were obtained for SARS-CoV-2 PCR testing 2 months after COVID-19. The Social Sciences (SPSS) program version 15.0 was used for statistical analysis. The Mann-Whitney U test compared SARS-CoV-2 antibody concentration between two groups. RESULTS: Four hundred sixty-four (52.3%) residents and 424 (47.7%) staff participated. Entirely 259 (29.2%) participants were anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG (+) and 255 (28.7%) were SARS-CoV-2 PCR (+). Both antibody and PCR positivity was detected in 196 (76.9%). In PCR (-) group, 63 (10.0%) participants were SARS-CoV-2 IgG (+). Antibody titers were found highest in SARS-CoV-2 PCR (+) male residents. SARS-CoV-2 IgG titers were significantly high in SARS-CoV-2 PCR (+) and hospitalized participants regardless of age. Stool samples were obtained from 61(23.9%) participants and were found negative. CONCLUSION: A durable SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibody response was monitored at least 9 months after the participants were diagnosed with COVID-19. SARS-CoV-2 antibody positivity was detected 76.9% in PCR (+) and 10.0% in PCR (-) participants. Knowing the duration of detectable antibodies is an important finding for developing disease prevention and public health strategies.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Long-Term Care , Aged , Humans , Male , COVID-19 Vaccines , Cross-Sectional Studies , Pandemics , Prospective Studies , COVID-19/diagnosis , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/prevention & control , SARS-CoV-2 , Antibodies, Viral , Vaccination , Immunoglobulin G
6.
Ir J Med Sci ; 192(2): 741-750, 2023 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35715663

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Characterizing the post-COVID health conditions is helpful to direct patients to appropriate healthcare. AIMS: To describe the presence of symptoms in COVID-19 patients within 6 months after diagnosis and to investigate the associated factors in terms of reporting symptoms. METHODS: Data of DEU-COVIMER (a telephone interview-based COVID-19 follow-up center established in a tertiary care hospital) was analyzed for SARS-CoV-2 RNA positive participants aged ≥ 18 years from November 1st, 2020, to May 31st, 2021. Symptom frequencies were stratified by demographic and clinical characteristics at one, three, and 6 months after diagnosis. With the patients who had symptoms at baseline, generalized estimating equations were applied to identify the factors associated with reporting of symptoms. RESULTS: A total of 5610 patients agreed to participate in the study. Symptom frequency was 37.2%, 21.8%, and 18.2% for the first, third, and sixth months. Tiredness/fatigue, muscle or body aches, and dyspnea/difficulty breathing were the most common symptoms in all time frames. In multivariate analysis, older age, female gender (odds ratio OR 1.74, 95% confidence interval 1.57-1.93), bad economic status (OR 1.37, 1.14-1.65), current smoking (OR 1.15, 1.02-1.29), being fully vaccinated before COVID-19 (OR 0.53, 0.40-0.72), having more health conditions (≥ 3 conditions, OR 1.78, 1.33-2.37), having more symptoms (> 5 symptoms, OR 2.47, 2.19-2.78), and hospitalization (intensive care unit, OR 2.18, 1.51-3.14) were associated with reporting of symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: This study identifies risk factors for patients who experience post-COVID-19 symptoms. Healthcare providers should appropriately allocate resources prioritizing the patients who would benefit from post-COVID rehabilitation.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Humans , Female , COVID-19/epidemiology , SARS-CoV-2 , Longitudinal Studies , RNA, Viral , Hospitalization , Post-Acute COVID-19 Syndrome , Fatigue , Dyspnea/epidemiology , Dyspnea/etiology
7.
Front Med (Lausanne) ; 9: 894126, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36117966

ABSTRACT

Background and objectives: Although several repurposed antiviral drugs have been used for the treatment of COVID-19, only a few such as remdesivir and molnupiravir have shown promising effects. The objectives of our study were to investigate the association of repurposed antiviral drugs with COVID-19 morbidity. Methods: Patients admitted to 26 different hospitals located in 16 different provinces between March 11-July 18, 2020, were enrolled. Case definition was based on WHO criteria. Patients were managed according to the guidelines by Scientific Board of Ministry of Health of Turkey. Primary outcomes were length of hospitalization, intensive care unit (ICU) requirement, and intubation. Results: We retrospectively evaluated 1,472 COVID-19 adult patients; 57.1% were men (mean age = 51.9 ± 17.7years). A total of 210 (14.3%) had severe pneumonia, 115 (7.8%) were admitted to ICUs, and 69 (4.7%) were intubated during hospitalization. The median (interquartile range) of duration of hospitalization, including ICU admission, was 7 (5-12) days. Favipiravir (n = 328), lopinavir/ritonavir (n = 55), and oseltamivir (n = 761) were administered as antiviral agents, and hydroxychloroquine (HCQ, n = 1,382) and azithromycin (n = 738) were used for their immunomodulatory activity. Lopinavir/ritonavir (ß [95% CI]: 4.71 [2.31-7.11]; p = 0.001), favipiravir (ß [95% CI]: 3.55 [2.56-4.55]; p = 0.001) and HCQ (ß [95% CI]: 0.84 [0.02-1.67]; p = 0.046) were associated with increased risk of lengthy hospital stays. Furthermore, favipiravir was associated with increased risks of ICU admission (OR [95% CI]: 3.02 [1.70-5.35]; p = 0.001) and invasive mechanical ventilation requirement (OR [95% CI]: 2.94 [1.28-6.75]; p = 0.011). Conclusion: Our findings demonstrated that antiviral drugs including lopinavir, ritonavir, and favipiravir were associated with negative clinical outcomes such as increased risks for lengthy hospital stay, ICU admission, and invasive mechanical ventilation requirement. Therefore, repurposing such agents without proven clinical evidence might not be the best approach for COVID-19 treatment.

8.
Turk J Gastroenterol ; 33(11): 955-963, 2022 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35946895

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In patients with coronavirus disease 2019, the gastrointestinal symptoms have been reported increasingly in addition to the respiratory system symptoms. The studies show that the prevalence of gastrointestinal system symptoms and how the gastrointestinal system contributes to the severity and prognosis of the disease is still not clear. This study aims to find the prevalence of gastrointestinal symptoms and the correlation between the gastrointestinal symptoms and the clinical results in hospitalized patients diagnosed with coronavirus disease 2019. METHODS: This study retrospectively analyzes patients diagnosed with coronavirus disease 2019 and hospitalized in the pandemic unit between March 2020 and August 2020 and compares their demographic and clinical characteristics, laboratory and radiologic findings, coronavirus disease 2019 treatments received, the clinical course of the disease, and the gastrointestinal symptoms. RESULTS: In our study, we included 322 patients diagnosed with coronavirus disease 2019 and hospitalized; 39 patients (12.1%) were admitted to the hospital with at least one gastrointestinal symptom (nausea and vomiting, diarrhea, abdominal pain, and the loss of taste). Nausea and vomiting are the most common gastrointestinal symptoms with a prevalence of 7.1%, followed by diarrhea with 2.8%, the loss of taste with 2.2%, and abdominal pain with 1.5%. The mean age and D-dimer levels of the patients showing gastrointestinal symptoms were lower than those who did not have any gastrointestinal symptoms. We did not find a significant correlation between the presence of the gastrointestinal symptoms and the severity of the disease, treatment received, risk of acute respiratory distress syndrome and septic shock, admission to the intensive care unit, the need for mechanical ventilation, the mortality rate or the length of hospitalization in the medical floor or the intensive care unit. CONCLUSION: In this study, we observed that 12.1% of coronavirus disease 2019 patients apply to the hospital due to gastrointestinal symptoms. Furthermore, the gastrointestinal symptoms do not seem to affect the severity and the course of the disease, it is important to identify coronavirus disease 2019 patients showing unusual symptoms such as the gastrointestinal symptoms at an early stage to protect healthcare professionals from infection risk.


Subject(s)
Ageusia , COVID-19 , Gastrointestinal Diseases , Humans , COVID-19/epidemiology , SARS-CoV-2 , Prevalence , Retrospective Studies , Turkey/epidemiology , Gastrointestinal Diseases/epidemiology , Gastrointestinal Diseases/diagnosis , Diarrhea/epidemiology , Diarrhea/etiology , Abdominal Pain/epidemiology , Abdominal Pain/etiology , Vomiting , Nausea
9.
Respir Med Res ; 82: 100937, 2022 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35792466

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To evaluate the management of patients with COVID-19 in the intensive care units (ICUs) with fungal infection/colonization and to highlight diagnostic problems in these patients. METHODS: We included all patients with a COVID-19 diagnosis who were aged ≥18 years and followed in the ICU for the first 8 months. Patient data were obtained from medical records. We compared the risk factors, laboratory data, and outcomes of patients with fungal infection/colonization. RESULTS: A total of 118 patients (81 men and 37 women) were included. The mean age was 70.3 ± 14.8 (35-94) years. Of the patients, 79 (66.9%) patients were ≥65 years old. Fungal infection/colonization was detected in 39 (33.1%) patients. Fungi were isolated from 34 (28.8%) patients. Ten fungal species were isolated from 51 samples (the most common being Candida albicans). Three patients (2.5%) had proven candidemia. We observed two (1.7%) possible cases of COVID-19-associated pulmonary aspergillosis (CAPA). Eighteen patients (15.3%) underwent antifungal therapy. The risk of fungal infection/colonization increased as the duration of invasive mechanical ventilation increased. The fatality rate was 61.9% and increased with age and the use of mechanical ventilation. The fatality rate was 4.2-times-higher and the use of mechanical ventilation was 35.9-times-higher in the patients aged ≥65 years than in the patients aged <65 years. No relationship was found between fungal colonization/infection, antifungal treatment, and the fatality rate. CONCLUSION: During the pandemic, approximately one-third of the patients in ICUs exhibited fungal infection/colonization. Candida albicans was the most common species of fungal infection as in the pre-pandemic area. Because of the cross-contamination risk, we did not performed diagnostic bronchoscopy and control thorax computed tomography during the ICU stay, and our patients mainly received empirical antifungal therapy.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Candidemia , Candidiasis , Male , Humans , Female , Adolescent , Adult , Middle Aged , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Candidiasis/diagnosis , Candidiasis/drug therapy , Candidiasis/microbiology , Antifungal Agents/therapeutic use , COVID-19/complications , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/therapy , COVID-19 Testing , Tertiary Care Centers , Intensive Care Units , Candidemia/drug therapy , Candida albicans
10.
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis ; 41(4): 597-607, 2022 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35083558

ABSTRACT

Candidemia may present as severe and life-threatening infections and is associated with a high mortality rate. This study aimed to evaluate the risk factors associated with 30-day mortality in patients with candidemia. A multi-center prospective observational study was conducted in seven university hospitals in six provinces in the western part of Turkey. Patient data were collected with a structured form between January 2018 and April 2019. In total, 425 episodes of candidemia were observed during the study period. Two hundred forty-one patients died within 30 days, and the 30-day crude mortality rate was 56.7%. Multivariable analysis found that SOFA score (OR: 1.28, CI: 1.154-1.420, p < 0.001), parenteral nutrition (OR: 3.9, CI: 1.752-8.810, p = 0.001), previous antibacterial treatment (OR: 9.32, CI: 1.634-53.744, p = 0.012), newly developed renal failure after candidemia (OR: 2.7, CI: 1.079-6.761, p = 0.034), and newly developed thrombocytopenia after candidemia (OR: 2.6, CI: 1. 057-6.439, p = 0.038) were significantly associated with 30-day mortality. Central venous catheter removal was the only factor protective against mortality (OR: 0.34, CI:0.147-0.768, p = 0.010) in multivariable analysis. Candidemia mortality is high in patients with high SOFA scores, those receiving TPN therapy, and those who previously received antibacterial therapy. Renal failure and thrombocytopenia developing after candidemia should be followed carefully in patients. Antifungal therapy and removing the central venous catheter are essential in the management of candidemia.


Subject(s)
Candidemia , Antifungal Agents/therapeutic use , Candida , Candidemia/drug therapy , Candidemia/mortality , Central Venous Catheters/adverse effects , Device Removal , Humans , Prospective Studies , Risk Factors , Turkey/epidemiology
11.
Exp Clin Transplant ; 20(5): 456-462, 2022 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33455571

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Tuberculosis risk in solid-organ transplant recipients is more than the general population, although tuberculosis incidence has been reported to decrease 5% in the last decade in Turkey. In Turkey, solid-organ transplants started in 1975; however, routine pretransplant tuberculosis risk screening programs are still not established. Therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis of tuberculosis prevalence, clinical forms, and prognosis of tuberculosis in solid-organ transplant recipients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We searched PubMed, Web of Knowledge, Google Scholar, EBSCOhost, and Scopus databases in English and Turkish Medical Index of Turkish Academic Network and Information Center, Turkish Citation Index, Turkish Medline, Central Thesis of ULAKBIM databases in Turkish (from inception until December 2018) for national and international reference lists of all relevant papers. We used standard methodological procedures (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses 2009). RESULTS: We found 199 published studies in English and 26 in Turkish. After exclusion of noneligible studies, there were 10 retrospective research articles and 16 case reports. There were 148 (3.2%) tuberculosis cases with 4553 solid-organ transplant recipients (4031 renal, 522 liver). Of the tuberculosis cases, 50 (33.8%) were pulmonary, 21 (14.2%) were pulmonary and extrapulmonary, 13 (8.8%) were miliary, 27 (18.2%) were disseminated, and 37 (25.0%) were extra-pulmonary tuberculosis cases involving a maximum of 2 organs. There were 19 cases (12.8%) of graft lost. Of the patients with tuberculosis, 34 (19.9%) died resulting from either tuberculosis or other reasons. CONCLUSIONS: In this meta-analysis, most of the centers did not perform pretransplant risk evaluations; every center had different clinical procedures and follow-ups. Tuberculosis prevalence in solid-organ transplant recipients differs according to study population. Case reports were mostly about extrapulmonary tuberculosis. All such patients should be followed-up by a standard regimen during pretransplant and posttransplant periods. Prospective studies should be considered.


Subject(s)
Organ Transplantation , Tuberculosis , Humans , Organ Transplantation/adverse effects , Organ Transplantation/methods , Prospective Studies , Retrospective Studies , Transplant Recipients , Treatment Outcome , Tuberculosis/diagnosis , Tuberculosis/epidemiology , Turkey/epidemiology
12.
Infect Dis Clin Microbiol ; 4(3): 156-162, 2022 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38633389

ABSTRACT

Objective: During the COVID-19 pandemic, antimicrobial and antifungal stewardship programs have lost their priority. Although all parenteral antifungals were used with the recommendations of infectious diseases specialists in the pre-pandemic period, most consultations were delayed during the pandemic because of the workload of infectious diseases specialists. In this period, antifungal treatments in hospitalized patients were managed by mostly primary physicians. Therefore, we aimed to detect the change in the consumption of antifungals during the pandemic. Materials and Methods: The data on the antifungal drug use by month and clinics, the number of beds, and the occupancy rate of the clinics were obtained from the hospital information registration system. We defined each drug according to the World Health Organization Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (WHO ATC) coding system and determined the defined daily dose (DDD). The antifungal consumption (DDD/ 100 bed-days) in pre-pandemic and pandemic periods was compared. Results: During the pandemic, the antifungal consumption increased two-fold (2019:7.43; 2020:18.03 DDD/100 bed-days). The highest antifungal consumption rate was in the hematology- oncology-hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) clinics with 2.5-fold (2019:39.86; 2020:98.48 DDD/ 100 bed-days) increase. Liposomal amphotericin B consumption made up the majority of this with a four-fold increase in the hematology-oncology-HSCT clinics. Conclusion: We detected a dramatic increase in antifungal consumption in both ICUs and inpatient clinics during pandemic. A novel antifungal stewardship approach is urgently needed.

13.
Turk J Gastroenterol ; 32(2): 123-132, 2021 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33960935

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In Turkey, cytomegalovirus (CMV) seropositivity has been reported to be high, between 85 and 100%. CMV has been responsible for disease exacerbation in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). We aimed to evaluate the presence of CMV in intestinal tissue by immunohistochemical staining in IBD and non-IBD patient groups, in a country with high CMV seroprevalence. METHODS: In this prospective cross-sectional study, the presence of intestinal CMV was investigated with tissue immunohistochemistry (IHC) staining, which is accepted as the gold standard method, and with polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in tissue and blood. Patients (≥18 years old, n = 189) who had a colonoscopic biopsy between January and May 2017 were included in the study at our hospital. Clinical, laboratory, endoscopic, and histopathological data of patients were assessed by dividing them into IBD (n = 34) and non-IBD (n = 155) groups. RESULTS: In this study, 567 colonic biopsy samples from 189 patients were evaluated. Tissue IHC staining was positive for 3 (1.58%) non-IBD patients. One of them was diagnosed as CMV ileitis. CMV DNA was also detected in 14 plasma (7.40%, <80-469 copies/mL) and 20 tissue samples (10.69%, 7-15 289 copies/mL). Tissue IHC staining is accepted as the gold standard for CMV ileitis, and the sensitivity and specificity of tissue PCR was 33% and 89.67%, while the sensitivity and specificity of plasma PCR was 66.66% and 93.54%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Although CMV seroprevalence is high in Turkey, CMV ileitis was diagnosed in only one non-IBD patient (0.53%). Compared to tissue IHC staining, the sensitivity of tissue and blood CMV PCR was low while their specificity was higher.


Subject(s)
Colitis , Cytomegalovirus Infections , Ileitis , Inflammatory Bowel Diseases , Adolescent , Cross-Sectional Studies , Cytomegalovirus/genetics , Cytomegalovirus Infections/epidemiology , DNA, Viral , Humans , Inflammatory Bowel Diseases/epidemiology , Prospective Studies , Seroepidemiologic Studies
14.
Respir Med ; 183: 106433, 2021 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33957434

ABSTRACT

The COVID-19-related death rate varies between countries and is affected by various risk factors. This multicenter registry study was designed to evaluate the mortality rate and the related risk factors in Turkey. We retrospectively evaluated 1500 adults with COVID-19 from 26 centers who were hospitalized between March 11 and July 31, 2020. In the study group, 1041 and 459 cases were diagnosed as definite and highly probable cases, respectively. There were 993 PCR-positive cases (66.2%). Among all cases, 1144 (76.3%) were diagnosed with non-severe pneumonia, whereas 212 (14.1%) had severe pneumonia. Death occurred in 67 patients, corresponding to a mortality rate of 4.5% (95% CI:3.5-5.6). The univariate analysis demonstrated that various factors, including male sex, age ≥65 years and the presence of dyspnea or confusion, malignity, chronic obstructive lung disease, interstitial lung disease, immunosuppressive conditions, severe pneumonia, multiorgan dysfunction, and sepsis, were positively associated with mortality. Favipiravir, hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin were not associated with survival. Following multivariate analysis, male sex, severe pneumonia, multiorgan dysfunction, malignancy, sepsis and interstitial lung diseases were found to be independent risk factors for mortality. Among the biomarkers, procalcitonin levels on the 3rd-5th days of admission showed the strongest associations with mortality (OR: 6.18; 1.6-23.93). This study demonstrated that the mortality rate in hospitalized patients in the early phase of the COVID-19 pandemic was a serious threat and that those patients with male sex, severe pneumonia, multiorgan dysfunction, malignancy, sepsis and interstitial lung diseases were at increased risk of mortality; therefore, such patients should be closely monitored.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/mortality , Pandemics , Population Surveillance , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Survival Rate/trends , Turkey/epidemiology
15.
Int J Clin Pract ; 75(7): e14230, 2021 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33864405

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Physicians hospitalize the patients with complicated urinary tract infections (cUTIs) when they need intravenous antibiotics and outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) is unavailable. Daily inpatient antimicrobial therapy is an alternative to hospitalization, which is similar to OPAT; patients go home after they are administered antibiotics in a separate room in the hospital setting. OBJECTIVES: We assessed our previous daily inpatient practice to revitalize the model in the COVID-19 era. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated the clinical and microbiological responses and the cost effectiveness of the patients with cUTIs who received daily inpatient ertapenem therapy. RESULTS: Our study population was 136 patients in 156 episodes. It was a difficult-to-treat group with older age (mean 63.0 ± 14.8 years) and a high burden of underlying conditions (86.5%). The most common causative organisms were Escherichia coli (74.4%) and Klebsiella pneumoniae (19.2%); 89.7% of the isolates were producing extended-spectrum beta lactamase (ESBL). The microbiologic and clinical success rates were 82.1% and 95.5%, respectively. The patients required hospitalization in 16 episodes (10.2%) because of clinical failures (3.8%), superinfections (2%), planned invasive interventions (3.2%), and side effects (1.2%). Our university hospital saved 1608 bed-days and 2596 € (9702 TL) bed costs. CONCLUSIONS: In the COVID-19 pandemic period, this seems to be an effective, safe, and cost-effective way to decrease hospitalizations for cUTIs in settings where OPAT is unavailable.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Escherichia coli Infections , Urinary Tract Infections , Aged , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Ertapenem , Escherichia coli Infections/drug therapy , Escherichia coli Infections/epidemiology , Hospitalization , Humans , Inpatients , Pandemics , Retrospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2 , Urinary Tract Infections/drug therapy , Urinary Tract Infections/epidemiology , beta-Lactamases
16.
Turk Thorac J ; 22(1): 95-98, 2021 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33646113

ABSTRACT

In December 2019, in Wuhan, China, scientists observed a sudden and sharp increase in the number of cases of pneumonia and acute respiratory distress syndrome of an unknown origin. By the end of January 2020, the outbreak had spread to Asia, Europe, America, and Australia. In this article, we have outlined the pandemic action plan of our university hospital.

17.
Exp Clin Transplant ; 2020 Nov 27.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33272151

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Immunosuppressive therapies have impro-ved survival in solid-organ transplant recipients at the expense of increased prevalence of opportunistic infections. We investigated the prevalence, risk factors, and prognosis of Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia in solid-organ transplant recipients who were followed by our transplant unit. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective observational study using medical record reviews to identify all adult solid-organ transplant recipients who underwent bronchoscopy and bronchoalveolar lavage between January 2011 and 2018. We collected clinical characteristics, including risk factors and prognosis. Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia symptoms com-patible with microscopy and/or positive nucleic acid amplification assays were defined as proven infection by P. jirovecii pneumonia. RESULTS: We identified 312 adult solid-organ transplants (114 renal, 1 kidney and pancreas, 197 liver) in this period. Overall, 113 (36.2%) pulmonary disease consultations were performed in the posttransplant stage, and 46 (40.7%) patients underwent bronchoalveolar lavage with P. jirovecii screening. We identified 18 patients who tested positive for P. jirovecii infection according to nucleic acid amplification assay; 3 were not proven, and 7 had a transplant date before 2011. The prevalence was 8/312 (2.6%); of these 8 patients, 5 had the same genotype cluster. Median P. jirovecii pneumonia development time was longer in renal transplant recipients (P = .016). Only renal transplant recipients were offered Pneumocystis prophylaxis for 6 months. Concomitant viral infection including cytomegalovirus was the only significant factor for P. jirovecii pneumonia development (P = .028). Intensive care admission was 40% (n = 6), and disease-related mortality was 33% (n = 5). CONCLUSIONS: The overall prevalence of P. jirovecii pneumonia in solid-organ transplant recipients was similar to other single-center reports. Prophylaxis prevented early posttransplant P. jirovecii pneumonia. However, P. jirovecii pneumonia may develop at any posttransplant stage, and viral infections other than cytomegalovirus should also be considered as a predictor.

18.
Cureus ; 12(1): e6600, 2020 Jan 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32064182

ABSTRACT

Primary cutaneous aspergillosis (PCA) can rarely affect immunocompetent people. There is limited knowledge about the prevalence, diagnosis and management of the disease because there are only case reports or small case series in the literature. For this reason, the diagnosis and treatment of three immunocompetent adult patients diagnosed with PCA were discussed by reviewing the literature. In the current report, in addition to treatment with voriconazole for 8-12 weeks we performed repeated surgical debridement for the treatment of these cases. After two negative tissue cultures, the wounds were either successfully closed primarily or reconstructed using a skin graft. Management of PCA cases will become easier as more reports and further studies of PCA contribute to our shared knowledge. Currently, the most appropriate management approach is to make individualized treatment decisions according to the patients' clinical features and treatment response which includes several surgical debridement as well as antifungal therapy.

19.
Asian J Surg ; 42(1): 131-143, 2019 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29398241

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The repair of difficult abdominal wall defects (AWDs) continues to be a crucial and demanding issue for surgeons. This study aimed to present the risk factors and the long-term results of usage of an expanded-polytetrafluoroethylene (e-PTFE) synthetic mesh for the AWR of difficult abdominal wall defects. METHODS: This study included 156 adult patients who underwent difficult AWR with e-PTFE mesh for incisional hernia, ventral hernia, and created AWDs of various etiopathologies. The association between the risk factors and the postoperative complications of AWR was analyzed, and overall long-term outcomes of e-PTFE repair were assessed. RESULTS: The median follow-up duration was 119.1 (ranging from 2 to 206) months. In 70 (44.8%) patients, there were major co-morbidities. A surgical site infection developed in 17 (10.9%) patients. Of these, only 2 (1.3%) patients had e-PTFE mesh infection. Seven (4.4%) patients experienced recurrence. Recalcitrant seroma formation occurred in 8 (36.3%) patients. CONCLUSION: E-PTFE synthetic mesh usage for difficult abdominal wall hernias can help the hernia surgeon obtain safe and durable long-term results of sound repair.


Subject(s)
Abdominal Wall/surgery , Hernia, Ventral/surgery , Incisional Hernia/surgery , Polytetrafluoroethylene , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Surgical Mesh , Adult , Aged , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Recurrence , Risk Factors , Seroma/epidemiology , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
20.
Turk J Med Sci ; 48(6): 1162-1166, 2018 Dec 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30541242

ABSTRACT

Background/aim: Solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients have increased risk of tuberculosis (TB). We aimed to investigate the prevalence and features of TB in liver transplant (LT) recipients at our transplantation canter. Materials and methods: All patients who underwent LT between January 2004 and December 2013 and whose data were accessible were included in the study. Demographic features, tuberculin skin test (TST) results, and TB prevalence were recorded. Characteristics of LT recipients who developed TB were evaluated. Results: A total of 403 patients underwent LT during this period. Mean age was 47.27 ± 11.04 years; 280 (69.47%) were males. The TST was administered to 108 (25.91%) and the QuantiFERON-TB test to 1 patient. TST positivity was determined in 28 (25.93%). Latent TB infection (LTBI) treatment was not recommended to any of the LT candidates. In the posttransplant period, 5 patients (1.24%) developed TB over a median duration of 14 (min: 7, max: 84) months, 2 of whom were found to have had LTBI in the pretransplant period. Conclusion: The prevalence of TB in LT recipients at our center was similar to that in the current literature. LTBI screening, including risk factor assessment and TST/QuantiFERON-TB testing, is necessary in the early diagnostic workup for TB in LT recipients.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...