Evaluation of different techniques for washing cats: quantitation of allergen removed from the cat and the effect on airborne Fel d 1.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to examine the quantity and distribution of the major cat allergen, Fel d 1, on cats and to evaluate the efficacy of washing, both in removing allergen from the cat and reducing airborne allergen levels. METHODS: Airborne samples were collected on four glass fiber filters in a 30 m3 room, before and 3 hours after serial washing of eight cats (45-minute sampling at 18 L/min for each filter). Aliquots of hair and bath water were also collected and assayed for Fel d 1 content. RESULTS: Extracting cat hair with tap water or pet shampoo for 3 minutes removed mean levels of 191 and 245 microg of Fel d 1 per gram of hair, respectively; the quantity of allergen on samples of cat hair ranged from 1 microg/gm to more than 1770 microg/gm. The highest concentration of allergen was found on hair from the neck. Estimates of the total Fel d 1 on the cat, based on shaving the whole cat, ranged from 3 to 142 mg (mean = 67 mg). Washing cats reduced airborne allergen 3 hours later. Washing three cats at weekly intervals for 5 weeks in a veterinarian's office produced a mean decrease of 44% in airborne Fel d 1 (n = 15, p < 0.02). Washing three cats by immersion for 3 minutes at weekly intervals for a 1-month period produced a mean decrease in airborne allergen of 79% (n = 12, p < 0.001). However, after repeated washing, the airborne levels before the next wash were not consistently decreased. The quantity of Fel d 1 removed by immersion varied from 1 to 35 mg. CONCLUSION: Cats carry large quantities of Fel d 1, only a small proportion of which (approximately 0.002%/hr) becomes airborne. Washing cats by immersion will remove significant allergen from the cat and can reduce the quantity of Fel d 1 becoming airborne. However, the decrease is not maintained at 1 week.

Evaluation of German cockroach (Orthoptera:Blattellidae) allergen and seasonal variation in low-income housing.

Six apartments in a low-income housing project were evaluated for German cockroach. Blattella germanica (L.), infestation and concentration of an allergen derived from these cockroaches (Bla g II). Kitchen and living room samples were collected monthly for 1 yr. In addition, airborne sampling was carried out in 5 kitchens. The kitchen had the highest allergen concentration in 65% of visits and the highest number of cockroaches trapped in 69% of visits. In the kitchen, the highest cockroach levels were seen in June, whereas the values for Bla g II peaked in August. In keeping with this, the closest correlation was between Bla g II (microgram/g dust) and the number of cockroaches found 2 mo earlier. Airborne samples were assayed for 2 separate allergens. Bla g II and Bla g I. No allergen was detectable in the absence of disturbance. By contrast, during disturbance with a vacuum cleaner both Bla g II and Bla g I were detectable in the air of each apartment. Results suggest that immunochemical assay of a major allergen in dust samples from the kitchen floor may be used to monitor exposure to German cockroaches, also that cockroach levels may be used as an indicator or predictor of allergen in dust.