Assessment of labor progress by ultrasound vs manual examination: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Assessment of labor progress via digital examination is considered the standard of care in most delivery rooms. However, this method can be stressful, painful, and imprecise, and multiple examinations increase the risk for chorioamnionitis. Intrapartum ultrasound was found to be an objective, noninvasive tool to monitor labor progression. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate whether, among nulliparous women, the use of intrapartum ultrasound can reduce the rate of intrapartum fever by reducing the number of digital examinations. STUDY DESIGN: This was a prospective, randomized controlled trial in term nulliparas admitted with prelabor rupture of membranes, induction of labor, or in latent phase of labor with a cervical dilation of <4 cm. Women were randomized into 1 of the following 2 arms: (1) labor progress assessed by ultrasound, avoiding digital examinations as much as possible; and (2) control group in which labor progression was assessed according to the regular protocol. Before the study, all labor ward physicians underwent training in intrapartum ultrasound. RESULTS: A total of 90 women were randomized to the ultrasound group and 92 were randomized to the control group. When compared with the control group, the ultrasound group had significantly lower rates of intrapartum fever (11.1% vs 26.1%; P=.01), clinical chorioamnionitis (3.3% vs 16.5%; P>.01), and histologic chorioamnionitis (2.2% vs 9.8%; P=.03). The median number of digital examinations was significantly lower in the ultrasound group (5; interquartile range, 4-6) than in the control group (8; interquartile range, 6-10; P<.01). The median number of digital examinations per hour in the ultrasound group was significantly lower than in the control group (0.2 vs 0.4; P<.01). The induction rates, time from admission to delivery, mode of delivery, Apgar score at 5 minutes, and neonatal intensive care unit admission rates did not differ significantly between the groups. CONCLUSION: The use of intrapartum ultrasound lessens the total number of digital examinations needed to be performed during labor and, consequently, the incidence of intrapartum fever and chorioamnionitis are reduced. No adverse effects on labor progression and short-term maternal or neonatal outcomes were noted.

The safety of early pregnancy exposure to granisetron.

OBJECTIVE: Current guidelines suggest that granisetron is an optional treatment for nausea and vomiting in pregnancy (NVP) despite lack of evidence to support fetal safety. We aimed to determine the association between early pregnancy exposure to granisetron and fetal/neonatal outcomes. DESIGN: Medical records of patients treated for NVP during the first and second trimester between June 2013 to September 2015 were reviewed. Patients were asked to participate in the study by answering a detailed questionnaire regarding newborn's health and complementary data. Pregnancy outcomes of patients exposed to granisetron were compared with those of patients who were not exposed to granisetron. RESULTS: 100 Granisetron exposed pregnancies were compared with 108 granisetron unexposed pregnancies. Exposure to granisetron occurred in the first trimester in 88 patients (94 fetuses). Maternal characteristics, history of anomalies in first degree relatives, co-exposure to other substances and extent of prenatal sonographic surveillance were comparable between both groups. Miscarriage rate was significantly lower among granisetron exposed patients compared to controls (0 vs 5.5 %, respectively, p = 0.03). Three major malformations were identified prenatally or postnatally in each of the groups (2.77 % Vs 2.83 %, p = 1). The rate of major malformations was similar between exposed and unexposed fetuses even after excluding second trimester exposure (3.2 % vs. 2.83 %, respectively p = 1). Mean gestational age at delivery, mean newborn weight and incidence of small for gestation age, were not significantly different between the groups. CONCLUSION: Granisetron exposure was not associated with increased risk for minor or major fetal anomalies. This study provides preliminary reassurance regarding the safety of in-utero exposure to granisetron.

Preimplantation genetic diagnosis versus prenatal diagnosis-decision-making among pregnant FMR1 premutation carriers.

PURPOSE: To detect which factors influence decision-making among pregnant FMR1 premutation carriers regarding the preferred mode of genetic diagnosis: IVF-PGT-M (in vitro fertilization with preimplantation genetic testing for monogenic gene diseases), or CVS (chorionic villus sampling), or AC (amniocentesis) after spontaneous conception. METHODS: In Israel FMR1 premutation preconception genetic screening is offered, free of charge, to every woman in her reproductive years. FMR1 premutation carriers with ≥ 70 CGG repeats, or a history of FXS offspring, are offered IVF-PGT-M. This is a historical cohort study including all pregnant FMR1 premutation carriers who underwent prenatal diagnosis between the years 2011 and 2016 at a tertiary medical center. Data were collected from electronic charts and through phone interviews. RESULTS: One hundred seventy-five women with high-risk pregnancies who were offered IVF-PGT-M were evaluated. In 37 pregnancies (21%), the women decided to undergo IVF-PGT-M. Using the generalized estimating equations (GEE) statistical method including seven parameters, we found that previous termination of pregnancy due to FXS and advanced woman's age were significantly associated with making the decision to undergo IVF-PGT-M. Previously failed IVF was the most significant parameter in a woman's decision not to undergo IVF-PGT-M. CONCLUSION: The most dominant factor affecting the decision of FMR1 premutation carriers to choose spontaneous conception with prenatal diagnosis versus IVF-PGT-M is a previous experience of failed IVF treatments. Women whose IVF treatments failed in the past tended to try to conceive naturally and later, during the course of the pregnancy, perform CVS or AC. Conversely, women who previously experienced a termination of pregnancy (TOP) due to an affected fetus, and older women, preferred to undergo IVF-PGT-M procedures.

Somatic NRAS mutation in patient with generalized lymphatic anomaly.

Generalized lymphatic anomaly (GLA or lymphangiomatosis) is a rare disease characterized by a diffuse proliferation of lymphatic vessels in skin and internal organs. It often leads to progressive respiratory failure and death, but its etiology is unknown. Here, we isolated lymphangiomatosis endothelial cells from GLA tissue. These cells were characterized by high proliferation and survival rates, but displayed impaired capacities for migration and tube formation. We employed whole exome sequencing to search for disease-causing genes and identified a somatic mutation in NRAS. We used mouse and zebrafish model systems to initially evaluate the role of this mutation in the development of the lymphatic system, and we studied the effect of drugs blocking the downstream effectors, mTOR and ERK, on this disease.