Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech ; 11(5): 330-3, 2001 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11668232

ABSTRACT

SUMMARY: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is considered the gold standard for gallstone disease. Nevertheless, possible severe complications must not be underestimated. Bowel injuries are uncommon, but they are one of the most lethal technical complications of laparoscopic surgery. These injuries were commonly unrecognized at the time of procedures and were diagnosed later when the patients experienced sepsis, peritonitis, intraabdominal abscess, or enterocutaneous fistula. Although duodenal lacerations have been reported with laparoscopic cholecystectomies, they seem to be rare; approximately 30 such cases have been documented previously in the English literature. We report the case of a patient with thermal duodenal injury caused by elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy at an outside center presenting as massive hematemesis and multiple intraabdominal abscesses on the ninth postoperative day. The diagnosis and management of this rare complication of laparoscopic cholecystectomy are described, and the literature is reviewed.


Subject(s)
Abdominal Abscess/etiology , Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic/adverse effects , Cholecystitis/surgery , Duodenum/injuries , Hematemesis/etiology , Abdominal Abscess/surgery , Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic/methods , Cholecystitis/diagnosis , Drainage/methods , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Hematemesis/surgery , Humans , Laparotomy/methods , Middle Aged , Postoperative Complications/surgery , Risk Assessment , Severity of Illness Index , Treatment Outcome
2.
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech ; 10(4): 200-7, 2000 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10961745

ABSTRACT

Although elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy is today's gold standard for the treatment of symptomatic cholelithiasis, its safety and effectiveness for acute cholecystitis remain controversial. The authors present a retrospective study comparing laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the acute versus the elective setting. A total of 605 patients were treated surgically for gallstone disease between August 1991 and January 1999. A total of 269 patients (44.5%) underwent surgery for acute cholecystitis as soon as possible after diagnosis, and elective cholecystectomy was performed on 336 patients (55.5%) for symptomatic gallstones. Initial open cholecystectomy was performed on 52 (19.3%) of the acute patients and 16 (4.8%) of the elective patients. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy was attempted on 217 of the acute patients (80.7%), with 11 cases (5.1%) converted to open cholecystectomy, and on 320 (95.2%) of the elective patients, with 6 cases (1.9%) converted to open cholecystectomy. The mean (+/-SD) operative time for the acute and elective patients was 105 (+/-38) and 85 (+/-21) minutes, respectively (P < 0.05). There was no perioperative mortality in either laparoscopic group. Surgical complications related to laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the acute and elective groups occurred in six (2.9%) and eight (2.5%) cases, respectively (P = NS). The current study shows that early laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis is safe and efficient. Low conversion rates can be maintained with strict guidelines for appropriate patient selection, adequate experience, and proper laparoscopic technique.


Subject(s)
Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic , Cholecystitis/surgery , Acute Disease , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Child , Elective Surgical Procedures , Emergency Treatment , Female , Humans , Intraoperative Complications , Male , Middle Aged , Postoperative Complications , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Failure
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...