Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Rural Med ; 18(2): 55-61, 2023 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37032985

ABSTRACT

Objective: To determine if distance from our Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) follow-up clinic exacerbated risk of clinic non-attendance in high-risk groups defined by socioeconomic status or medical complexity, as geographical distance from the hospital can affect attendance rates at NICU follow-up clinics. Patients and Methods: We retrospectively identified infants born between January 2014 and June 2018, and subsequently discharged from our 50-bed level IV NICU, which serves a predominantly rural population. Patients were included in our study if they had at least one NICU clinic follow-up visit scheduled at discharge. Distance to the clinic was calculated based on family ZIP code. Mixed-effects logistic regression analysis of attendance at each scheduled visit was used to identify independent associations and interactions with distance among study covariates. Results: We included 576 patients in our study, with 74% missing at least one clinic appointment, and 30% not attending any of the three appointments. Median distance between our hospital and families was 53 km. On multivariable analysis, neither distance nor other infant or family characteristics were associated with clinic non-attendance. Only interfacility transfer had a statistically significant interaction with distance and this association only reached statistical significance for patients living furthest from our center. Conclusions: NICU follow-up is important, but clinic attendance is poor. For families living furthest away, transfers of care during the infant's hospitalization may be associated with lower completion of recommended post-discharge follow-up. Further research is needed to understand how clinics can mitigate barriers to attendance.

2.
Pediatr Emerg Care ; 38(8): 376-379, 2022 Aug 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35727995

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: We assessed whether prior communication between pediatric hematologists and emergency department (ED) providers reduced time to administration of parenteral antibiotics for children with sickle cell disease presenting with fever. METHODS: Patients 2 months to 21 years of age were retrospectively identified if they were followed up at our center's pediatric hematology clinic and presented to the pediatric ED with fever. Emergency department-hematology communication before patient arrival was ascertained by chart review. The primary outcome was time to administration of parenteral antibiotics after ED arrival, with 60 minutes being the recommended maximum. RESULTS: Forty-nine patients were included in the analysis. Prior communication occurred in 43% of cases, with a median time to antibiotic administration of 79 minutes in this group (interquartile range, 59-142), compared with 136 minutes for patients without prior communication (interquartile range, 105-181 minutes; P = 0.012). The groups did not differ in hospital length of stay at the index visit. CONCLUSIONS: Advance communication between the pediatric hematologist and ED physician was associated with reduced time to antibiotic administration for febrile children with sickle cell disease. Further interventions should be explored to achieve timely antibiotics administration within 60 minutes of ED arrival.


Subject(s)
Anemia, Sickle Cell , Emergency Service, Hospital , Anemia, Sickle Cell/complications , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Child , Communication , Fever/drug therapy , Fever/etiology , Humans , Retrospective Studies
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...