Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 8 de 8
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Water Res ; 47(10): 3291-9, 2013 Jun 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23622816

ABSTRACT

Biofouling on RO membranes has major cost implications in water reclamation. In this study membranes and water samples were collected from a RO pilot-plant operated on two sites to study the differences in microbial communities in order to develop a better understanding of the biofouling. For the two sites studied, the examination of the front membrane of the first stage and the tail membrane of the second stage of the RO train using 16S rRNA gene-based molecular technique showed that bacteria were similar on both stages and no significant effect of the membrane location within the RO train on the biofilm development could be discerned. However, the comparison of the identified bacteria from membrane samples between the two sites showed that each site is specific, leading to a different composition of microbial communities. The different nutrient concentrations in the RO feed water due to the different biological pre-treatments are one potential explanation for the observed differences in the microbial communities. Seasonal variations also play a major role in the development of microbial communities as shown by the significant differences observed between the communities measured in the samples in winter and summer on the second site. The results did not show similarity between the species identified on the RO membranes and in the feed water. Hence, the relationship of microbial community between the water generated during the pre-treatment process and RO membranes is not obvious. From this study, results showed that there is an actual need to investigate the development of microbial communities on membrane surface in real conditions in order to suggest tailored solutions for biofouling control and removal.


Subject(s)
Bacteria/isolation & purification , Membranes, Artificial , Microbial Consortia , Wastewater/microbiology , Water Purification/methods , Bacteria/genetics , Biodiversity , Biofilms , Biofouling , Microbial Consortia/genetics , Osmosis , Queensland , RNA, Ribosomal, 16S/genetics , Recycling , Seasons , Sewage/microbiology , Waste Disposal, Fluid/instrumentation , Waste Disposal, Fluid/methods , Water Purification/instrumentation , Water Quality
2.
Water Res ; 47(8): 2633-42, 2013 May 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23541121

ABSTRACT

This study aims at comparing low-pressure membrane fouling obtained with two different secondary effluents at bench and pilot-scale based on the determination of two fouling indices: the total fouling index (TFI) and the hydraulically irreversible fouling index (HIFI). The main objective was to investigate if simpler and less costly bench-scale experimentation can substitute for pilot-scale trials when assessing the fouling potential of secondary effluent in large scale membrane filtration plants producing recycled water. Absolute values for specific flux and total fouling index for the bench-scale system were higher than those determined from pilot-scale, nevertheless a statistically significant correlation (r(2) = 0.63, α = 0.1) was obtained for the total fouling index at both scales. On the contrary no such correlation was found for the hydraulically irreversible fouling index. Advanced water characterization tools such as excitation-emission matrix fluorescence spectroscopy (EEM) and liquid chromatography with organic carbon detection (LC-OCD) were used for the characterization of foulants. On the basis of statistical analysis, biopolymers and humic substances were found to be the major contribution to total fouling (r(2) = 0.95 and r(2) = 0.88, respectively). Adsorption of the low molecular weight neutral compounds to the membrane was attributed to hydraulically irreversible fouling (r(2) = 0.67).


Subject(s)
Chromatography, Liquid/methods , Environmental Monitoring/methods , Spectrometry, Fluorescence/methods , Waste Disposal, Fluid , Water Purification , Chromatography, Liquid/economics , Environmental Monitoring/economics , Filtration , Pressure , Spectrometry, Fluorescence/economics , Water Quality
4.
Phys Rev B Condens Matter ; 46(10): 6626-6629, 1992 Sep 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10002360
6.
Phys Rev B Condens Matter ; 36(8): 4249-4253, 1987 Sep 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9943403
8.
Phys Rev Lett ; 55(18): 1931-1934, 1985 Oct 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10031964
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...