Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 59
Filter
1.
J Immigr Minor Health ; 23(1): 26-34, 2021 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32451693

ABSTRACT

Asian Americans are one of the fastest growing races in the US. The objectives of this report were to assess self-reported hypertension prevalence and treatment among Asian Americans. Merging 2013, 2015, and 2017 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System data, we estimated self-reported hypertension and antihypertensive medication use among non-Hispanic Asian Americans (NHA) and compared estimates between NHA and non-Hispanic whites (NHW), and by NHA subgroup (Asian Indian, Chinese, Filipino, Japanese, Korean, and Vietnamese/other). The prevalence of hypertension was 20.8% and 33.5%, respectively, for NHAs and NHWs (p < 0.001). Among those with hypertension, the prevalence of antihypertensive medication use was 71.6% and 78.2%, respectively, for NHAs and NHWs (p < 0.001). Among NHA subgroups, a wide range of hypertension prevalence and medication use was found. Overall NHA had a lower reported prevalence of hypertension and use of antihypertensive medication than NHW. Certain NHA subgroups had a burden comparable to high-risk disparate populations.


Subject(s)
Antihypertensive Agents , Hypertension , Antihypertensive Agents/therapeutic use , Asian , Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System , Humans , Hypertension/drug therapy , Hypertension/epidemiology , Prevalence , Self Report
2.
Res Social Adm Pharm ; 16(2): 183-189, 2020 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31085142

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The literature lacks information about the use and cost of prescribed antihypertensive medications, especially by the type and class of medication prescribed. OBJECTIVE: This study investigated the uses and expenses of antihypertensive medications among hypertensive adults in the United States. METHODS: Using the 2014-2015 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey data, adult men and nonpregnant women aged 18 or older who had a diagnosis code of hypertension and used any prescribed antihypertensive medication were included in the study (n = 10,971). Adults with hypertension who were using a single antihypertensive medication were defined as single medication users, and those using two or more medications were defined as multiple medication users. Medications were classified into angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs), angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs), calcium channel blockers (CCBs), thiazide-type diuretics (TDs), ß-blockers (BBs), and others. The average annual total antihypertensive medication expenses and the expenditures of each medication class were estimated by using generalized linear models with a log link and gamma distribution and were adjusted to 2015 US dollars. RESULTS: Among 10,971 hypertensive adults, 4759 (44.1%) were single medication users, and 6212 (55.9%) were multiple medication users. The average annual total cost for antihypertensive medications was $336 per person (95% confidence interval [CI] = $319-$353); $199 (95% CI = $177-$221) for single medication users and $436 (95% CI = $413-$459) for multiple medication users. The average annual costs for each medication class were estimated at $438 (95% CI = $384-$492) for ARBs and $49 for TDs (95% CI = $44-$55). CONCLUSIONS: Users of multiple medications incurred more than twice the expense than single medication users. When comparing classes of medications, the cost for ARBs was the highest, whereas the cost for TDs was the lowest. This information can be used in evaluating the cost-effectiveness of antihypertension therapies.


Subject(s)
Antihypertensive Agents/economics , Antihypertensive Agents/therapeutic use , Fees, Pharmaceutical , Hypertension/drug therapy , Hypertension/economics , Surveys and Questionnaires , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Drug Therapy, Combination/economics , Female , Humans , Hypertension/epidemiology , Male , Middle Aged , Young Adult
3.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep ; 68(5): 101-106, 2019 Feb 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31851653

ABSTRACT

Heart disease is the leading cause of death in the United States (1). Heart attacks (also known as myocardial infarctions) occur when a portion of the heart muscle does not receive adequate blood flow, and they are major contributors to heart disease, with an estimated 750,000 occurring annually (2). Early intervention is critical for preventing mortality in the event of a heart attack (3). Identification of heart attack signs and symptoms by victims or bystanders, and taking immediate action by calling emergency services (9-1-1), are crucial to ensure timely receipt of emergency care and thereby improve the chance for survival (4). A recent report using National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) data from 2014 found that 47.2% of U.S. adults could state all five common heart attack symptoms (jaw, neck, or back discomfort; weakness or lightheadedness; chest discomfort; arm or shoulder discomfort; and shortness of breath) and knew to call 9-1-1 if someone had a heart attack (5). To assess changes in awareness and response to an apparent heart attack, CDC analyzed data from NHIS to report awareness of heart attack symptoms and calling 9-1-1 among U.S. adults in 2008, 2014, and 2017. The adjusted percentage of persons who knew all five common heart attack symptoms increased from 39.6% in 2008 to 50.0% in 2014 and to 50.2% in 2017. The adjusted percentage of adults who knew to call 9-1-1 if someone was having a heart attack increased from 91.8% in 2008 to 93.4% in 2014 and to 94.9% in 2017. Persistent disparities in awareness of heart attack symptoms were observed by demographic characteristics and cardiovascular risk group. Public health awareness initiatives and systematic integration of appropriate awareness and action in response to a perceived heart attack should be expanded across the health system continuum of care.


Subject(s)
Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Myocardial Infarction/diagnosis , Myocardial Infarction/prevention & control , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Female , Health Surveys , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Socioeconomic Factors , United States , Young Adult
4.
J Am Heart Assoc ; 8(13): e011324, 2019 07 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31238768

ABSTRACT

Background Asian Americans are the fastest growing population in the United States, but little is known about their cardiovascular health (CVH). The objective of this study was to assess CVH among non-Hispanic Asian Americans (NHAAs) and to compare these estimates to those of non-Hispanic white (NHW) participants. Methods and Results Merging NHANES (National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey) data from 2011 to 2016, we examined 7 metrics (smoking, weight, physical activity, diet, blood cholesterol, blood glucose, and blood pressure) to assess CVH among 5278 NHW and 1486 NHAA participants aged ≥20 years. We assessed (1) the percentage meeting 6 to 7 metrics (ideal CVH), (2) the percentage meeting only 0 to 2 metrics (poor CVH), and (3) the overall mean CVH score. We compared these estimates between NHAAs and NHWs and among foreign-born NHAAs by birthplace and number of years living in the United States. The adjusted prevalence of ideal CVH was 8.7% among NHAAs and 5.9% among NHWs ( P<0.001). NHAAs were significantly more likely to have ideal CVH (adjusted prevalence ratio: 1.42; 95% CI, 1.29-1.55) compared with NHWs. Among NHAAs, there was no significant difference in ideal CVH between US- and foreign-born participants, nor by number of years living in the United States. With lower body mass index thresholds (<23, normal weight) for NHAAs, there were no statistically significant differences in the adjusted prevalence of ideal CVH (6.5% versus 5.9%, P=0.216) between NHAAs and NHWs. Conclusions NHAAs had a higher prevalence of overall ideal CVH compared with NHWs. However, when using a lower body mass index threshold for NHAAs, there was no difference in ideal CVH between the groups.


Subject(s)
Asian/statistics & numerical data , Blood Glucose/metabolism , Blood Pressure , Body Mass Index , Cholesterol/metabolism , Diet, Healthy/statistics & numerical data , Exercise , Smoking/epidemiology , Adult , Aged , Diet , Female , Health Status , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Nutrition Surveys , United States/epidemiology , White People/statistics & numerical data , Young Adult
5.
Prev Chronic Dis ; 16: E78, 2019 06 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31228234

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Early recognition of stroke symptoms and recognizing the importance of calling 9-1-1 improves the timeliness of appropriate emergency care, resulting in improved health outcomes. The objective of this study was to assess changes in awareness of stroke symptoms and calling 9-1-1 from 2009 to 2014. METHODS: We analyzed data among 27,211 adults from 2009 and 35,862 adults from 2014 using the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS). The NHIS included 5 questions in both 2009 and 2014 about stroke signs and symptoms and one about the first action to take when someone is having a stroke. We estimated the prevalence of awareness of each symptom, all 5 symptoms, the importance of calling 9-1-1, and knowledge of all 5 symptoms plus the importance of calling 9-1-1 (indicating recommended stroke knowledge). We assessed changes from 2009 to 2014 in the prevalence of awareness. Data analyses were conducted in 2016. RESULTS: In 2014, awareness of stroke symptoms ranged from 76.1% (sudden severe headache) to 93.7% (numbness of face, arm, leg, side); 68.3% of respondents recognized all 5 symptoms, and 66.2% were aware of all recommended stroke knowledge. After adjusting for sex, age, educational attainment, and race/ethnicity, logistic regression results showed a significant absolute increase of 14.7 percentage points in recommended stroke knowledge from 2009 (51.5%) to 2014 (66.2%). Among US adults, recommended stroke knowledge increased from 2009 to 2014. CONCLUSION: Stroke awareness among US adults has improved but remains suboptimal.


Subject(s)
Emergency Medical Dispatch , Stroke/diagnosis , Adult , Aged , Asian People , Female , Health Education , Health Promotion , Hispanic or Latino , Humans , Logistic Models , Male , Middle Aged , Public Health , Socioeconomic Factors , Surveys and Questionnaires , Time Factors , United States
6.
Am J Prev Med ; 56(1): e13-e21, 2019 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30337237

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Self-measured blood pressure monitoring (SMBP) plus additional clinical support is an evidence-based strategy that improves blood pressure control. Despite national recommendations for SMBP use and potential cost savings, insurance coverage for implementation is limited in the U.S. and little is known regarding clinical implementation. METHODS: In 2017, using 2015 and 2016 DocStyles survey data from 1,590 primary care physicians and nurse practitioners in U.S. outpatient facilities, SMBP-related clinical practices and provider roles were assessed. RESULTS: Almost all (97%) respondents reported using SMBP. Among 1,539 who used SMBP, more than half (60%) used SMBP for a combination of diagnostic and treatment purposes, whereas 24% used SMBP for diagnosis only and 16% used SMBP for treatment only. The most common methods for patients to share SMBP results with clinical staff were paper log (68%); during appointments (66%); by telephone (37%); by secure website (22%); or by secure e-mail (19%). Nearly all (98%) respondents reported that medication adjustments were provided to patients based on SMBP readings. About 15% did not counsel patients regarding cuff size, and 8% did not validate patient devices. Only 13% of respondents reported having monitor loaner programs, and availability did not vary by the financial status of the patient population (p=0.59). CONCLUSIONS: SMBP is used widely in outpatient facilities as reported in the survey, although provider roles and SMBP-related practices vary, and gaps exist regarding patient counseling, device validation, and loaner program availability. As part of efforts to improve hypertension control, healthcare professionals can promote increased use of best practices for SMBP, whereas insurers can implement standardization and support of SMBP.


Subject(s)
Blood Pressure Monitoring, Ambulatory/statistics & numerical data , Blood Pressure/physiology , Hypertension/diagnosis , Adult , Blood Pressure Monitoring, Ambulatory/methods , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Primary Health Care , Self Care/methods , Surveys and Questionnaires , United States
7.
Am J Health Promot ; 32(6): 1357-1364, 2018 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29972073

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To describe changes in consumer knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors related to sodium reduction from 2012 to 2015. DESIGN: A cross-sectional analysis using 2 online, national research panel surveys. SETTING: United States. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 7796 adults (18+ years). MEASURES: Sodium-related knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors. ANALYSIS: Data were weighted to match the US population survey proportions using 9 factors. Wald χ2 tests were used to examine differences by survey year and hypertensive status. RESULTS: Despite the lack of temporal changes observed in respondent characteristics (mean age: 46 years, 67% were non-Hispanic white, and 26% reported hypertension), some changes were found in the prevalence of sodium-related knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors. The percentage of respondents who recognized processed foods as the major source of sodium increased from 54% in 2012 to 57% in 2015 ( P = .04), as did the percentage of respondents who buy or choose low/reduced sodium foods, from 33% in 2012 to 37% in 2015 ( P = .016). In contrast, the percentage of self-reported receipt of health professional advice among persons with hypertension decreased from 59% in 2012 to 45% in 2015 ( P < .0001). Other sodium-related knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors did not change significantly during 2012 to 2015. CONCLUSION: In recent years, some positive changes were observed in sodium-related knowledge and behaviors; however, the decrease in reported health professional advice to reduce sodium among respondents with hypertension is a concern.


Subject(s)
Consumer Behavior , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Health Promotion/methods , Health Promotion/trends , Hypertension/prevention & control , Sodium, Dietary/adverse effects , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Forecasting , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Surveys and Questionnaires , United States
8.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep ; 67(20): 575-578, 2018 May 25.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29795076

ABSTRACT

Stroke is a leading cause of mortality and disability in the United States (1,2). Approximately 800,000 American adults experience a stroke each year (2,3). Currently, approximately 6 million stroke survivors live in the United States (2). Participation in stroke rehabilitation (rehab), which occurs in diverse settings (i.e., in-hospital, postacute care, and outpatient settings), has been determined to reduce stroke recurrence and improve functional outcomes and quality of life (3,4). Despite longstanding national guidelines recommending stroke rehab, it remains underutilized, especially in the outpatient setting. Professional associations and evidence-based guidelines support the increasing stroke rehab use in health systems and are promoted by the public health community (3-6). An analysis of 2005 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) data revealed that 30.7% of stroke survivors reported participation in outpatient rehab for stroke after hospital discharge in 21 states and the District of Columbia (DC) (7). To update these estimates, 2013 and 2015 BRFSS data were analyzed to assess outpatient rehab use among adult stroke survivors. Overall, outpatient rehab use was 31.2% (20 states and DC) in 2013 and 35.5% (four states) in 2015. Disparities were evident by sex, race, Hispanic origin, and level of education. Focused attention on system-level interventions that ensure participation is needed, especially among disparate populations with lower levels of participation.


Subject(s)
Ambulatory Care/statistics & numerical data , Stroke Rehabilitation/statistics & numerical data , Survivors/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System , District of Columbia , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , United States , Young Adult
9.
Prev Chronic Dis ; 15: E40, 2018 04 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29625630

ABSTRACT

Uncontrolled hypertension, a common disorder, is associated with increased long-term risk of several serious conditions. Awareness of the health risks of uncontrolled hypertension is not well understood. We used data from a nationwide panel survey to assess the awareness of risk associated with uncontrolled hypertension, stratified by cardiovascular disease risk factors. Awareness of increased risk from uncontrolled hypertension was high for some outcomes (heart attack, heart failure, stroke), and low for others (kidney disease, dementia). Several disparities in awareness were found. Complementary clinical and public health interventions could be instituted to increase awareness and target people who are high risk.


Subject(s)
Disease Progression , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Hypertension/complications , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Comorbidity , Female , Health Surveys , Humans , Hypertension/epidemiology , Hypertension/psychology , Male , Middle Aged , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Self Report , Young Adult
10.
J Am Heart Assoc ; 7(7)2018 03 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29592969

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The proportion of foreign-born US adults has almost tripled since 1970. However, less is known about the cardiovascular morbidity by birthplace among adults residing in the United States. This study's objective was to compare the prevalence of coronary heart disease (CHD) and stroke among US adults by birthplace. METHODS AND RESULTS: We used data from the 2006 to 2014 National Health Interview Survey. Birthplace was categorized as United States or foreign born. Foreign born was then grouped into 6 birthplace regions. We defined CHD and stroke as ever being told by a physician that she or he had CHD or stroke. We adjusted for select demographic and health characteristics in the analysis. Of US adults, 16% were classified as foreign born. Age-standardized prevalence of both CHD and stroke were higher among US- than foreign-born adults (CHD: 8.2% versus 5.5% for men and 4.8% versus 4.1% for women; stroke: 2.7% versus 2.1% for men and 2.7% versus 1.9% for women; all P<0.05). Comparing individual regions with those of US- born adults, CHD prevalence was lower among foreign-born adults from Asia and Mexico, Central America, or the Caribbean. For stroke, although men from South America or Africa had the lowest prevalence, women from Europe had the lowest prevalence. Years of living in the United States was not related to risk of CHD or stroke after adjustment with demographic and health characteristics. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, foreign-born adults residing in the United States had a lower prevalence of CHD and stroke than US-born adults. However, considerable heterogeneity of CHD and stroke risk was found by region of birth.


Subject(s)
Coronary Disease/ethnology , Emigrants and Immigrants , Residence Characteristics , Stroke/ethnology , Adolescent , Adult , Age Distribution , Aged , Coronary Disease/diagnosis , Female , Health Surveys , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prevalence , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Sex Distribution , Stroke/diagnosis , Time Factors , United States/epidemiology , Young Adult
12.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep ; 67(7): 219-224, 2018 Feb 23.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29470459

ABSTRACT

Hypertension, which affects nearly one third of adults in the United States, is a major risk factor for heart disease and stroke (1), and only approximately half of those with hypertension have their hypertension under control (2). The prevalence of hypertension is highest among non-Hispanic blacks, whereas the prevalence of antihypertensive medication use is lowest among Hispanics (1). Geographic variations have also been identified: a recent report indicated that the Southern region of the United States had the highest prevalence of hypertension as well as the highest prevalence of medication use (3). Using data from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS), this study found minimal change in state-level prevalence of hypertension awareness and treatment among U.S. adults during the first half of the current decade. From 2011 to 2015, the age-standardized prevalence of self-reported hypertension decreased slightly, from 30.1% to 29.8% (p = 0.031); among those with hypertension, the age-standardized prevalence of medication use also decreased slightly, from 63.0% to 61.8% (p<0.001). Persistent differences were observed by age, sex, race/ethnicity, level of education, and state of residence. Increasing hypertension awareness, as well as increasing hypertension control through lifestyle changes and consistent antihypertensive medication use, requires diverse clinical and public health intervention.


Subject(s)
Antihypertensive Agents/therapeutic use , Hypertension/drug therapy , Hypertension/epidemiology , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prevalence , Self Report , United States/epidemiology , Young Adult
13.
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich) ; 20(2): 225-232, 2018 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29397582

ABSTRACT

Patients' adherence to antihypertensive medications is key to controlling high blood pressure. Evidence-based strategies to improve adherence exist, but their use, individually and in combination, has not been described. 2015-2016 DocStyles data were analyzed to describe health care professionals' and their practices' use of 10 strategies to improve antihypertensive medication adherence across 3 categories: prescribing, education, and tracking/encouragement. Among 1590 respondents, a mean of using 5 strategies was reported, with individual strategy use ranging from 17.2% (providing patients adherence-related rewards) to 69.4% (prescribing once-daily regimens). Those with higher odds of using ≥7 strategies and strategies across all 3 categories included: (1) nurse practitioners compared to family practitioners/internists and (2) health care professionals in practices with standardized hypertension treatment protocols who routinely recommend home blood pressure monitor use compared to respondents without those characteristics. Despite using an array of evidence-based adherence-promoting strategies, additional opportunities exist for health care professionals to provide adherence support among hypertensive patients.


Subject(s)
Antihypertensive Agents/therapeutic use , Hypertension , Medication Adherence/statistics & numerical data , Nurse Practitioners , Physicians, Family , Practice Patterns, Physicians' , Attitude of Health Personnel , Blood Pressure Monitoring, Ambulatory/methods , Evidence-Based Practice/methods , Evidence-Based Practice/standards , Female , Humans , Hypertension/diagnosis , Hypertension/drug therapy , Hypertension/epidemiology , Male , Outpatients/statistics & numerical data , Patient Preference/statistics & numerical data , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/standards , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/statistics & numerical data , Quality Improvement , Surveys and Questionnaires , United States/epidemiology
14.
Am J Prev Med ; 53(6S2): S164-S171, 2017 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29153117

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Trends of prevalence, treatment, and control of hypertension have been documented in the U.S., but changes in medical expenditures associated with hypertension over time have not been evaluated. This study analyzed these expenditures during 2000-2013 among U.S. adults. METHODS: Data from the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey were analyzed in 2016. The study population was non-institutionalized men and non-pregnant women aged ≥18 years. Hypertension was defined as ever been diagnosed with hypertension or currently taking antihypertensive medications. Medical expenditures included all payments to medical care providers. Expenditures associated with hypertension were estimated by two-part regression models and adjusted into 2015 U.S. dollars. Controlling variables included sociodemographic characteristics, marital status, insurance, region, smoking status, weight status, health status, and comorbidities. Trends were analyzed using joinpoint method. RESULTS: Total per-person annual expenditures associated with hypertension in 2000-2001 ($1,399) were not significantly different from those in 2012-2013 ($1,494) (average annual percent change [AAPC]= -0.6%, p=0.794), but annual national spending increased significantly from $58.7 billion to $109.1 billion (AAPC=8.3%, p=0.015), mainly because of the increase in the number of people treated for hypertension. Per-person outpatient payments were 22.7% higher in 2012-2013 than in 2000-2001 ($416 vs $322, p<0.05; AAPC=0.8%, p-trend=0.826). Payments for prescription medications took up a larger proportion of the medical expenditures associated with hypertension, compared to payments for outpatient or other services (33%-46%). CONCLUSIONS: During 2000-2013, annual national medical expenditures associated with hypertension increased significantly. Preventing hypertension could alleviate hypertension-associated economic burden.


Subject(s)
Antihypertensive Agents/economics , Cost of Illness , Health Expenditures/trends , Hypertension/drug therapy , Hypertension/therapy , Prescription Drugs/economics , Adult , Aged , Ambulatory Care/economics , Ambulatory Care/statistics & numerical data , Ambulatory Care/trends , Antihypertensive Agents/therapeutic use , Comorbidity , Female , Health Expenditures/statistics & numerical data , Health Status , Humans , Hypertension/economics , Hypertension/epidemiology , Insurance, Health/economics , Insurance, Health/statistics & numerical data , Insurance, Health/trends , Male , Middle Aged , Prescription Drugs/therapeutic use , Prevalence , United States , Young Adult
15.
Am J Prev Med ; 53(6S2): S213-S219, 2017 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29153123

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act provision implemented policies to improve coverage for young adults. It is not known if it affected access to care among young adults with hypertension. METHODS: National Health Interview Survey data from 2006 to 2009 and 2011 to 2014 were used. Young adults aged 19-25 years were assessed for potential barriers to access to health care. The authors compared the percentage of each indicator of barriers to access to health care among young adults in general, as well as those with hypertension in the two time periods and estimated the AOR. All data were self-reported. The analyses were conducted in 2016. RESULTS: Among young adults, the frequencies of barrier indicators were significantly lower in 2011-2014 than 2006-2009, except "did not see doctor in the past 12 months." Among those with hypertension, the percentage reporting "no health insurance" (31.3% vs 23.3%, p=0.037); "no place to see a doctor when needed" (30.5% vs 21.6%, p=0.031); or "cannot afford prescribed medicine" (23.0% vs 15.3%, p=0.023) were significantly lower in 2011-2014 compared with that of 2006-2009. The differences maintained statistical significance after adjusting for sex, race/ethnicity, and level of education. CONCLUSIONS: Significant differences in select access to care measures were found among young adults with hypertension between 2006-2009 and 2011-2014, as was found among young adults generally. Changes in extension of dependent insurance coverage in 2010 may have led to improvements in access to care among this group.


Subject(s)
Health Services Accessibility/statistics & numerical data , Hypertension/therapy , Insurance Coverage/economics , Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act/economics , Adult , Educational Status , Ethnicity/statistics & numerical data , Female , Health Services Accessibility/economics , Health Services Accessibility/trends , Health Surveys/statistics & numerical data , Health Surveys/trends , Humans , Hypertension/economics , Insurance Coverage/statistics & numerical data , Insurance Coverage/trends , Male , Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act/statistics & numerical data , Self Report , Sex Factors , United States , Young Adult
16.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep ; 66(33): 869-873, 2017 Aug 25.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28837549

ABSTRACT

Heart disease is the leading cause of death in the United States (1). Each year, approximately 790,000 adults have a myocardial infarction (heart attack), including 210,000 that are recurrent heart attacks (2). Cardiac rehabilitation (rehab) includes exercise counseling and training, education for heart-healthy living, and counseling to reduce stress. Cardiac rehab provides patients with education regarding the causes of heart attacks and tools to initiate positive behavior change, and extends patients' medical management after a heart attack to prevent future negative sequelae (3). A systematic review has shown that after a heart attack, patients using cardiac rehab were 53% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 41%-62%) less likely to die from any cause and 57% (95% CI = 21%-77%) less likely to experience cardiac-related mortality than were those who did not use cardiac rehab (3). However, even with long-standing national recommendations encouraging use of cardiac rehab (4), the intervention has been underutilized. An analysis of 2005 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) data found that only 34.7% of adults who reported a history of a heart attack also reported subsequent use of cardiac rehab (5). To update these estimates, CDC used the most recent BRFSS data from 2013 and 2015 to assess the use of cardiac rehab among adults following a heart attack. Overall use of cardiac rehab was 33.7% in 20 states and the District of Columbia (DC) in 2013 and 35.5% in four states in 2015. Cardiac rehab use was underutilized overall and differences were evident by sex, age, race/ethnicity, level of education, cardiovascular risk status, and by state. Increasing use of cardiac rehab after a heart attack should be encouraged by health systems and supported by the public health community.


Subject(s)
Ambulatory Care/statistics & numerical data , Cardiac Rehabilitation/statistics & numerical data , Myocardial Infarction/rehabilitation , Survivors/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System , District of Columbia , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , United States , Young Adult
17.
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich) ; 19(6): 584-591, 2017 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28371252

ABSTRACT

Home blood pressure monitoring (HBPM) among hypertensive adults was assessed using the 2012 American Heart Association Cardiovascular Health Consumer Survey. The prevalence of hypertension was 25.5% and 53.8% of those reported HBPM. Approximately 63% of hypertensive adults 65 years and older reported HBPM followed by 51% and 34.6% (35-64 and 18-34 years, respectively; P=.001). Those who had seen a healthcare professional within a year reported HBPM compared with those who had not (54.8% vs 32.8%, P=.047). Those who believed that lowering blood pressure can reduce risk of heart attack and stroke had a higher percentage of HBPM compared with those who did not (55.5% vs 33.1%, P=.01). Age and the belief that lowering blood pressure could reduce cardiovascular disease risk were significant factors associated with HBPM. Half of the adult hypertensive patients reported HBPM and its use was greater among those who reported a positive attitude toward lowering blood pressure to reduce cardiovascular disease risk.


Subject(s)
American Heart Association/organization & administration , Blood Pressure Monitoring, Ambulatory/methods , Blood Pressure Monitoring, Ambulatory/statistics & numerical data , Cardiovascular Diseases/prevention & control , Hypertension/physiopathology , Adolescent , Adult , Age Factors , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Attitude to Health , Culture , Female , Health Surveys , Humans , Hypertension/epidemiology , Hypertension/psychology , Male , Middle Aged , Perception , Prevalence , Stroke/prevention & control , United States/epidemiology , Young Adult
18.
Am J Health Promot ; 31(1): 68-75, 2017 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26389978

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To describe the prevalence and determinants of sodium-related knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors among U.S. adults Design. A cross-sectional survey was used. SETTING: The study was set in the United States in 2012. SUBJECTS: Participants were 6122 U.S. adults. MEASURES: Sodium-related knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors were measured. ANALYSIS: Chi-squared tests were used to determine differences in sodium-related knowledge, attitude, and behaviors by respondent characteristics; multiple logistic regression was used to examine associations between selected respondent characteristics and health professional advice, reported action, or knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors (adjusted for all other respondent characteristics). RESULTS: About three-fourths of respondents answered eating too much sodium is "somewhat" or "very" harmful to their health. Twenty-six percent reported receiving health professional advice, and 45% reported taking action to reduce their sodium intake. The prevalence of reported action was highest among adults receiving advice, those with hypertension, blacks, and those aged ≥65 years. Sixty-two percent who reported action agreed that most of their sodium comes from processed or restaurant foods. Of those reporting action, the most common tactics to reduce sodium intake were checking nutrition labels, using other spices than salt, and choosing low-sodium foods; requesting lower-sodium options when eating out was the least common tactic. CONCLUSION: Results suggest almost half of adults overall and the vast majority of those receiving health professional advice are taking some action to watch or reduce sodium intake. Although a substantial proportion report using recommended tactics to lower intake, many are not using the most effective tactics. In order to reach the general population, health communication messages could be simpler and focus on the most effective tactics to reduce sodium intake. Furthermore, health professionals can help reduce sodium intake by discussing the benefits of sodium reduction and tactics to do so, regardless of a hypertension diagnosis.


Subject(s)
Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Sodium, Dietary/administration & dosage , Adolescent , Adult , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Male , United States/epidemiology , Young Adult
19.
J Am Heart Assoc ; 5(12)2016 12 21.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28003253

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Hypertension is a major risk factor for heart disease and stroke. Health insurance coverage affects hypertension treatment and control, but limited information is available for US adults with hypertension who are classified as underinsured. METHODS AND RESULTS: Using Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System 2013 data, we identified adults with self-reported hypertension. On the basis of self-reported health insurance status and health care-related financial burdens, participants were categorized as uninsured, underinsured, or adequately insured. Proxies for health care received included whether they reported taking antihypertensive medications and whether they visited a doctor for a routine checkup in the past year. We assessed the association between health insurance status and health care received, adjusting for selected sociodemographic characteristics. Among 123 257 participants from 38 states and District of Columbia with self-reported hypertension, 12% were uninsured, 26% were underinsured, and 62% were adequately insured. In adjusted models using adequately insured participants as referent, both uninsured (adjusted odds ratio, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.35-0.43) and underinsured (0.83, 0.76-0.89) participants were less likely to report using antihypertensive medication than those of adequately insured participants. Similarly, adjusted odds ratio of visiting a doctor for routine checkup in the past year were 0.25 (0.23-0.28) for those who were uninsured and 0.78 (0.72-0.84) for those who were underinsured compared to those with adequate insurance. CONCLUSIONS: Uninsured and underinsured participants with hypertension were less likely to report receiving care compared to those with adequate insurance coverage. Disparities in health care coverage may necessitate targeted interventions, even among people with health insurance.


Subject(s)
Health Services Accessibility/economics , Hypertension/economics , Insurance Coverage/statistics & numerical data , Insurance, Health , Medically Uninsured/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Costs and Cost Analysis , Female , Humans , Hypertension/epidemiology , Male , Middle Aged , Morbidity/trends , Odds Ratio , Risk Factors , Self Report , Socioeconomic Factors , United States/epidemiology , Young Adult
20.
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich) ; 18(9): 892-900, 2016 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26841710

ABSTRACT

Nonadherence, or not taking medications as prescribed, to antihypertensive medications has been associated with uncontrolled hypertension. The authors analyzed data from HealthStyles 2010 to assess medication nonadherence among adults with hypertension. The overall prevalence of hypertension was 27.4% and the prevalence of nonadherence was 30.5% among hypertensive adult respondents. Nonadherence rates were highest among younger adults (aged 18-44 years), Hispanics, those who reported lowest annual income (<$25,000), and those who reported depression. The most common reason stated for nonadherence was "I cannot afford the medication" (35.1%). A multivariate logistic regression model showed age, race, and household income to be associated with nonadherence. These findings suggest that certain subgroups are more likely to report barriers to adherence. Interventions to support the management of hypertension should consider the identification of certain at-risk subgroups and utilize community and clinical evidenced-based resources to improve long-term control.


Subject(s)
Hypertension/epidemiology , Medication Adherence/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Aged , Antihypertensive Agents/therapeutic use , Female , Humans , Hypertension/drug therapy , Logistic Models , Male , Middle Aged , Prevalence , Risk Factors , Surveys and Questionnaires , United States/epidemiology , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...