ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To compare recurrent instability and return to sport rates along with external rotation differences between on-track (non-engaging) Hill-Sachs lesion patients undergoing either an isolated Bankart repair (IBR) or a Bankart repair augmented with a remplissage procedure (B+R). METHODS: A search was conducted using 3 databases (PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL) in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Only clinical comparative (level of evidence I-III) studies were considered for inclusion. Quality assessment was performed using the MINORS criteria. RESULTS: Six, level of evidence III studies, totaling 537 patients (202 B+R and 335 IBR) were included for analysis. All patients had <20% glenoid bone loss and a non-engaging, on-track Hill Sachs lesion. At a median final follow-up of 34.7 months, recurrent dislocation rates ranged from 0-7.7% and 3.5-30% in the B+R and IBR groups, respectively. Moreover, subjective instability and revision surgery rates presented lower ranges in the B+R upon comparison with the IBR cohort (0-32% versus 5-71.4% and 0-5% versus 0-35%, respectively). Furthermore, return to pre-injury level of sports ranged from 64-100% in the remplissage augmented group and 50-90% in the IBR cohort. Post-operative external rotation at side varied from 50-63º in the B+R and 55º-63º in the IBR arm. Additional subgroup analysis revealed recurrent dislocation rates in athletes and patients with near-track Hill-Sachs lesions undergoing remplissage augmentation to be 0-5% and 2-47% while ranging 8.8-30% and 9-66% for IBR patients, respectively. CONCLUSION: Upon qualitative analysis, ranges of recurrent instability measures including recurrent dislocation rates, are higher in patients undergoing IBR in comparison to B+R. Activity level influences outcomes as athletes were found to have a higher range of recurrent dislocation rates in the IBR group. The addition of remplissage showed a higher range of return to sport rates with comparable post-operative external rotation between groups. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Systematic Review of Level III studies.
