Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 43
Filter
2.
Leuk Lymphoma ; 64(7): 1285-1294, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37154379

ABSTRACT

Total-body irradiation (TBI)-based conditioning regimen is preferred in acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). We retrospectively evaluated allogeneic stem cell transplant (alloSCT) outcomes of 86 adult ALL patients in complete remission (CR) who received TBI-containing reduced intensity (RIC) (Flu/Mel/TBI = 31) and myeloablative conditioning (MAC) (VP16/TBI = 47; CY/TBI = 8) between January 2005 and December 2019. All patients received peripheral blood allografts. Patients in the RIC group were older than the MAC group (61 years old versus 36 years, p < .001). Donor was 8/8 HLA-matched in 83% and unrelated in 65% of patients. Three-year survival was 56.04% for RIC and 69.9% for MAC (HR 0.64; p = .19). Propensity score-based multivariable Cox analyses (PSCA) did not demonstrate any difference in grade III-IV acute graft versus host disease (GVHD) (SHR 1.23, p = .91), chronic GVHD (SHR 0.92, p = .88), survival (HR 0.94, p = .92), and relapse-free survival (HR 0.66, p = .47) between both groups, while relapse rate was lower (SHR 0.21, p = .02) for MAC compared to RIC. Our study did not demonstrate any difference in survival for TBI-containing RIC and MAC alloSCT for adult ALL in CR.


Subject(s)
Graft vs Host Disease , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute , Adult , Humans , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Stem Cell Transplantation , Graft vs Host Disease/etiology , Graft vs Host Disease/prevention & control , Remission Induction , Acute Disease , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/adverse effects , Transplantation Conditioning
3.
Hematol Oncol Stem Cell Ther ; 16(2): 154-157, 2023 Jan 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34425096

ABSTRACT

Mantle cell lymphoma is a rare subtype of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma with poor prognosis and continue to be challenging to treat. The choice of first line induction regimen remains a topic of debate due paucity of clinical trials. We retrospectively evaluated 66 patients diagnosed with mantle cell lymphoma who achieved first complete response after induction chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplant. Treatment groups were divided into low-intensity versus high-intensity regimens. Our data showed the intensity of induction regimen does not impact posttransplant outcomes of mantle cell lymphoma who underwent autologous stem cell transplant in first complete response.


Subject(s)
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Lymphoma, Mantle-Cell , Adult , Humans , Lymphoma, Mantle-Cell/therapy , Transplantation, Autologous , Induction Chemotherapy , Retrospective Studies , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Remission Induction , Stem Cell Transplantation
4.
J Oncol ; 2022: 3472324, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36213836

ABSTRACT

Purpose: Women with locally advanced/high-risk triple-negative breast cancer treated with the current standard chemotherapy continue to have a poor prognosis. High-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell transplant as treatment for locally advanced/high-risk breast cancer remains controversial due to a lack of survival benefit seen in previous phase III trials. However, these trials evaluated a heterogeneous group of patients with different receptor subtypes. A marginal benefit was observed in certain subgroups. We report long-term outcomes of women with stage IIB or III triple-negative breast cancer treated with high-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplant at our institution between 1995 and 2001. Methods: This is a retrospective analysis of stage IIB or stage III triple-negative breast cancer treated with high-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplant. We excluded women with hormone-positive, HER2/neu-positive/unknown, and/or metastatic disease prior to transplant as per updated AJCC 7th edition guidelines. Patients underwent surgery and either neoadjuvant or adjuvant anthracycline and taxane-based chemotherapy and then proceeded to high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplant using carmustine 600 mg/sqm, cyclophosphamide 5.6gm/sqm, and cisplatin 165 mg/sqm (STAMP 1 regimen) for consolidation. This was followed by locoregional breast and lymph node radiation per standard of care. Results: Twenty-nine women (2 stage IIB and 27 stage III) were evaluated. The median age at diagnosis was 43 years (IQR: 40, 51). Eleven patients had 4-9 regional lymph nodes (LN) involved and 16 had 10+ involved LNs. Four patients had T4 or inflammatory breast cancer and two had ipsilateral supraclavicular LNs involved. The median follow-up time is 16 years (95% CI: 12, 19, range <1-19 y) posttransplant. The median overall survival was 15 years (95% CI: 3, 19); the median DFS was 14 years (95% CI: 1, 19). Conclusions: This study of locally advanced/high-risk triple-negative breast cancer treated with adjuvant high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplant reveals high overall survival rate. With the current improvement in treatment-related mortality, re-evaluating this approach in this subset of high-risk breast cancer in prospective randomized studies may be worthwhile.

5.
Leuk Lymphoma ; 63(4): 813-820, 2022 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34781825

ABSTRACT

Utilization of novel agents such as brentuximab vedotin (BV) and check-point inhibitors (CI) has increased in patients with relapsed/refractory (r/r) classical Hodgkin Lymphoma (cHL). We conducted a retrospective study of 209 patients who had ASCT for r/r cHL at our institution and compared outcomes of those who had ASCT from 2010-2018 (cohort 2, n = 110) with those who had ASCT between 2000 and 2009 (cohort 1, n = 99). The median OS was 7.6 years for cohort 1 [HR 2.08; 95% CI 1.14-3.80; p = 0.017] and not reached for cohort 2; with 4-year improved OS difference of 15% (80% vs 65%) in cohort 2 vs cohort 1. The median PFS of cohort 1 was 30 months vs 39 months for cohort 2[HR 1.24; 95% CI 0.82-1.88; p = 0.3]. This study highlights improved OS of r/r cHL patients who have received ASCT in the novel agent era due to the exposure to agents such as BV and CIs.


Subject(s)
Hodgkin Disease , Immunoconjugates , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , Brentuximab Vedotin , Hodgkin Disease/pathology , Humans , Immunoconjugates/therapeutic use , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/drug therapy , Retrospective Studies , Transplantation, Autologous
6.
Transplant Cell Ther ; 27(9): 760-767, 2021 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34174469

ABSTRACT

Limited information is available on the efficacy of post-transplantation cyclophosphamide (PTcy) or thymoglobulin for graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis in mismatched unrelated donor (MMUD) transplants. We retrospectively compared outcomes of 76 adult patients with acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) or myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) who underwent 7/8 HLA-MMUD transplantation and received either PTcy (50 mg/kg on day 3 and 4) or thymoglobulin (total dose 4.5 mg/kg) for GVHD prophylaxis. In addition, tacrolimus and mycophenolate were used in both groups. Propensity score-based multivariable analyses (PSCA) were performed to adjust confounding effects of patient characteristics between both groups. Between January 2006 and June 2019, 25 patients received PTcy, and 51 received thymoglobulin. Median age of the population was 57 years, 78% of patients had AML, most common graft source was peripheral blood (96%), and 46% received myeloablative conditioning regimens. Median time to neutrophil (15 versus 11 days, P < .001) and platelet engraftment (21 versus 15 days, P = .002) was prolonged in the PTcy group. The cumulative incidence of grade III-IV acute GVHD at day 100 was similar (12% versus 19.6%, P = .38), whereas chronic GVHD at 1 year was lower with PTcy compared to thymoglobulin (16% versus 49%, P = .006). Using PSCA, no difference in survival, relapse, relapse-free survival, and GVHD-free relapse-free survival was seen between groups. However, thymoglobulin was associated with higher incidence of acute (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.63, P = .01) and chronic GVHD (HR = 4.43, P = .03), and non-relapse mortality (HR 3.38, P = .04) compared to PTcy. Our study demonstrated that PTcy resulted in significantly lower rates of acute and chronic GVHD and non-relapse mortality compared to thymoglobulin in 7/8 HLA-MMUD transplants for AML and MDS.


Subject(s)
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute , Myelodysplastic Syndromes , Adult , Antilymphocyte Serum , Cyclophosphamide/therapeutic use , Humans , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/therapy , Middle Aged , Myelodysplastic Syndromes/therapy , Retrospective Studies , Unrelated Donors
7.
Transplant Cell Ther ; 27(8): 665.e1-665.e7, 2021 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33991722

ABSTRACT

Fludarabine 30 mg/m2/d × 5 and melphalan 140 mg/m2 × 1 (Flu-Mel140) is a commonly used reduced-intensity conditioning regimen. We hypothesized that addition of 200cGy total body irradiation (TBI) to Flu-Mel140 may improve antitumor activity and transplant outcomes. Primary objectives was overall survival (OS) at 3 years. Secondary objectives were to assess the cumulative incidences of acute and chronic GVHD, relapse-free survival (RFS), relapse rate, and nonrelapse mortality (NRM). We retrospectively evaluated outcomes of patients receiving Flu-Mel140-TBI followed by HLA-matched donor allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT) using peripheral blood stem cells. Eighty-one patients (median age, 58 years) underwent alloSCT between January 2008 and December 2018. Thirty-one percent of patients had a prior transplant, 32% had high or very-high disease risk index, and the donor was unrelated in 70% of patients. Grade 3 to 4 regimen-related toxicities were mucositis (37%), cardiac toxicity (17%), and renal toxicity (10%). The cumulative incidence of grade III to IV acute GVHD at day +100 was 24.7% and chronic GVHD at 1 year was 51.3%. Median follow-up for survival was 6.1 years. At 3 years, OS was 39.81%, RFS was 31.47%, and relapse rate was 30.5%. One-year NRM was 29.9%. Patients undergoing first transplantation experienced improved OS compared with second or beyond (63.08% versus 42.31%, P = .02). After adjusting for disease subtypes, age (≤55 versus 55), comorbidity index (CI), number of transplant and GVHD prophylaxis, multivariable analysis did not demonstrate any survival difference among disease subtypes. High CI (≥3) was predictive of adverse OS and NRM, whereas older age (>55 years) was associated with high NRM. Our study shows that Flu-Mel140-TBI seems feasible and provides durable disease control. Addition of TBI did not appear to improve outcomes compared to previously published reports of Flu-Mel140. Considerable NRM could result from the inclusion of patients with older age and prior transplants.


Subject(s)
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation , Aged , Humans , Melphalan , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local , Retrospective Studies , Vidarabine/analogs & derivatives , Whole-Body Irradiation
8.
Leuk Lymphoma ; 62(8): 1982-1989, 2021 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33627028

ABSTRACT

The information on the impact of cytokine release syndrome (CRS) on haploidentical donor peripheral blood stem cell transplant (haploPBSCT) outcomes is limited. We retrospectively evaluated 98 patients who underwent haploPBSCT between June 2012 and June 2019 for the onset and severity of CRS per the ASTCT guidelines. The incidence of CRS was 93% (91/98). Outcomes were compared between grade 1-2 and 3-4 CRS. Eighty-one patients developed grade 1-2 CRS (89%) and 10 (11%) developed grade 3-4 CRS. Compared to grade 1-2 CRS, grade 3-4 CRS experienced adverse survival (73.7% vs. 30%, p<.001), inferior relapse-free survival (64.0% vs. 20%, p<.001), and higher non-relapse mortality (NRM) (16.4% vs. 60%, p<.001) at 1-year. Propensity score-based multivariable analyses revealed worse survival (HR 2.71, p=.04), and higher NRM (SHR 4.51, p=.006) with grade 3-4 CRS. Our study shows that grade 3-4 CRS was adversely associated with survival. Therefore, early identification and preventive strategies are warranted.


Subject(s)
Graft vs Host Disease , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation , Cyclophosphamide , Cytokine Release Syndrome , Graft vs Host Disease/etiology , Humans , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local , Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation/adverse effects , Retrospective Studies , Transplantation Conditioning/adverse effects
9.
Ann Hematol ; 100(4): 969-978, 2021 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33594448

ABSTRACT

A head-to-head comparison of outcomes of unrelated donor allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell transplantation for AML between reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) and myeloablative conditioning (MAC) regimens using thymoglobulin for GVHD prophylaxis is limited. We evaluated outcomes of 122 AML patients who received either busulfan (Bu)/fludarabine (Flu)/low-dose total body irradiation (TBI) as RIC (n = 64, 52%) or Bu/Flu as MAC (n = 58, 48%), and thymoglobulin 4.5 mg/kg total dose between day - 3 to - 1 for GVHD prophylaxis. Grades III-IV acute GVHD (aGVHD) was lower with Bu/Flu/TBI compared with Bu/Flu (6.2% vs 26.1%, p = 0.009). At 1 year, Bu/Flu/TBI was associated with similar chronic GVHD (41.2% vs 44.8%, p = 0.75), OS (61.9% vs 56.9%, p = 0.69), relapse rate (29.9% vs 20.7%, p = 0.24), relapse-free survival (52.8% vs 50%, p = 0.80), non-relapse mortality (17.4% vs 29.3%, p = 0.41), and GVHD-free relapse-free survival (24.2% vs 27.5%, p = 0.80) compared with Bu/Flu. Multivariable analysis did not reveal any difference in outcomes between both regimens. In summary, thymoglobulin at 4.5 mg/kg did not have any adverse impact on survival when used with RIC regimen. Both Bu/Flu/TBI and Bu/Flu conditioning regimens yielded similar survival.


Subject(s)
Antilymphocyte Serum/therapeutic use , Busulfan/therapeutic use , Graft vs Host Disease/prevention & control , Immunosuppressive Agents/therapeutic use , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/therapy , Myeloablative Agonists/therapeutic use , Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation , Transplantation Conditioning/methods , Vidarabine/analogs & derivatives , Aged , Allografts , Busulfan/adverse effects , Female , Graft vs Host Disease/etiology , Humans , Infections/epidemiology , Lymphocyte Depletion , Male , Middle Aged , Mycophenolic Acid/therapeutic use , Myeloablative Agonists/adverse effects , Progression-Free Survival , Retrospective Studies , T-Lymphocytes , Tacrolimus/therapeutic use , Treatment Outcome , Unrelated Donors , Vidarabine/adverse effects , Vidarabine/therapeutic use , Whole-Body Irradiation
10.
Leuk Lymphoma ; 62(2): 446-453, 2021 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33043743

ABSTRACT

The use of G-CSF post allogeneic transplant has become a common practice to accelerate neutrophil engraftment. There is some controversy in its use. To further evaluate the effectiveness, we compared outcomes in patients who underwent PBSCT, either with or without the planned use of G-CSF post SCT. Among consecutive 162 patients from October 2012 to October 2014, 65 patients received G-CSF post-PBSCT, and 97 did not. More patients in G-CSF group received MAC (78% vs. 55%). Patients who received G-CSF had earlier neutrophil engraftment (median days 11 vs. 14) and shorter post-transplant hospital stay (median days 16 vs. 20, p = 0.001). G-CSF use was associated with a higher rate of extensive chronic GVHD (44.3% vs.61.5%, p = 0.027). G-CSF cost the equivalent of 0.25 hospital days but shortened the initial transplant admission by 4 days. Early cost-benefit may be later offset by the economic burden of chronic GVHD and associated complications.


Subject(s)
Graft vs Host Disease , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation , Bone Marrow Transplantation , Graft vs Host Disease/epidemiology , Graft vs Host Disease/etiology , Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/adverse effects , Hospitals , Humans , Incidence , Length of Stay , Neutrophils , Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation/adverse effects , Transplantation, Homologous
11.
Bone Marrow Transplant ; 56(3): 741-744, 2021 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33060839

ABSTRACT

Limited information is available on the impact of intensity of conditioning regimens in haploidentical peripheral blood stem cell transplant (haploPBSCT) with post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTcy). We retrospectively compared outcomes of haplo-PBSCT between myeloablative (MAC) (n = 24) and reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) regimens (n = 65). Propensity score-based multivariable analyses were performed to adjust confounding effects of baseline characteristics between both groups. Eighty-nine patients underwent haplo-PBSCT between January 2012 and June 2019. For MAC and RIC, the cumulative incidences of grade III--IV acute GVHD were 4.2% and 3.1%, respectively (p = 0.92), and chronic GVHD were 18.9% and 36.5%, respectively (p = 0.08). Median follow-up for overall survival (OS) after MAC and RIC was 1.86 and 2.2 years, respectively. For MAC and RIC, one-year OS was 68.8% and 67.4%, respectively (p = 0.85); one-year relapse rate was 22.4% and 18.3%, respectively (p = 0.74); one-year relapse-free survival (RFS) was 56% and 59.7%, respectively (p = 0.87); and one-year non-relapse mortality (NRM) was 22% and 21.9%, respectively (p = 0.58). Using propensity score-based multivariable analyses, no difference in OS (HR 0.72, p = 0.51), relapse (SHR 0.63, p = 0.42), RFS (HR 0.74, p = 0.49) and NRM (SHR 1.11, p = 0.87) was noted between RIC and MAC. Our study shows no difference in outcomes between MAC and RIC regimens in haplo-PBSCT.


Subject(s)
Graft vs Host Disease , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation , Humans , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local , Retrospective Studies , Transplantation Conditioning
12.
Leuk Lymphoma ; 61(13): 3137-3145, 2020 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32779495

ABSTRACT

Anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) targets in-vivo T lymphocytes. Variations in the recipient absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) might result in a variable exposure of ATG. We hypothesized that recipient ALC on the first day of ATG might predict transplant outcomes. We evaluated 217 patients undergoing 8/8 HLA-matched unrelated donor (MUD) peripheral blood stem cell transplant (PBSCT) between January 2005 and December 2017, and receiving rabbit ATG (Thymoglobulin, total dose 4.5 mg/kg) on days -3, -2 and -1. With a median follow up of 3.68 years for survival (OS), one-year OS, relapse rate, non-relapse mortality (NRM), and relapse-free survival (RFS) were 64.7%, 15.9%, 25.8%, and 58.4%, respectively. Multivariable analysis revealed that ALC > 100 k/mm3 was associated with superior RFS (HR 0.64, p = .03). Our study indicates that ALC on the first day of thymoglobulin affects relapse-free survival in MUD PBSCT when weight-based thymoglobulin is used.


Subject(s)
Graft vs Host Disease , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation , Antilymphocyte Serum , Humans , Lymphocyte Count , Recurrence , Retrospective Studies , Transplantation Conditioning , Unrelated Donors
13.
Leuk Lymphoma ; 61(8): 1877-1884, 2020 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32270725

ABSTRACT

Maintenance therapy after first autologous transplant (autoSCT) improves progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in multiple myeloma (MM). However, efficacy of maintenance therapy after second autoSCT is unknown. We retrospectively evaluated outcomes of 111 adult MM patients who underwent second autoSCT between January 2000 and December 2018. Lenalidomide up to 15 mg daily or subcutaneous bortezomib 1.3 mg/m2 every 2 weeks was considered maintenance therapy. Outcomes were compared among three groups: no-maintenance (n = 73), lenalidomide (n = 23), and bortezomib maintenance (n = 15). At a median follow-up of 58 months from second autoSCT for survival, 3-year PFS and OS for no-maintenance, lenalidomide, and bortezomib maintenance were 11.2%, 29.9%, and 0%, respectively; and 58.5%, 83.3%, and 67.5% respectively. Lenalidomide maintenance was associated with improved PFS (HR 0.46, p = 0.009) and OS (HR 0.25, p = 0.009) compared to no-maintenance. Lenalidomide maintenance therapy after second autoSCT appears to prolong PFS and OS.


Subject(s)
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Multiple Myeloma , Adult , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Bortezomib/therapeutic use , Disease-Free Survival , Humans , Lenalidomide/therapeutic use , Multiple Myeloma/drug therapy , Retrospective Studies , Stem Cell Transplantation , Transplantation, Autologous
15.
Am J Hematol ; 95(2): 198-204, 2020 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31691333

ABSTRACT

Impact of Plerixafor (P) mobilized stem cells on immune reconstitution, such as absolute lymphocyte count at day 30 (ALC30), and on long-term outcomes of Multiple Myeloma (MM) patients undergoing autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) has not been well established. We evaluated total of 469 patients mobilized with G-CSF (G) alone, and 141 patients mobilized with G-CSF plus plerixafor (G+ P). Patients only received plerixafor if they had peripheral blood CD34+ blood count <20/µL on first planned day of collection. Primary endpoint, ALC30, was 1.3 K/µL (range, 0.1-4.5) and 1.2 K/µL (range, 0.1-5.1) for G and G + P, respectively (P =. 61). The median PFS was 2.5 years (95% CI, 2.1-3.2) and 2.8 years (95% CI, 2.0-3.3) for G and G + P, respectively (HR: 1.13; 95% CI, 0.84-1.50; P = .42). The median OS was 6.1 years (95% CI, 4.6-NR) for G group compared to 3.7 years (95% CI, 3.2-NR) for the G + P group (HR: 1.64; 95% CI, 1.12-2.40; P = .01). The median follow-up time for OS was 2.53 years (95% CI, 2.13-2.99) and 1.59 years (95% CI, 1.17-2.02) for G and G+ P group, respectively. In this large retrospective analysis of MM patients mobilized with G-CSF vs G-CSF + P, there was no significant difference in lymphocyte recovery or PFS. There was an overall survival difference in patients who were poor mobilizers and could not be mobilized with G-CSF alone.


Subject(s)
Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor/administration & dosage , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Mobilization , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Heterocyclic Compounds/administration & dosage , Multiple Myeloma/therapy , Recovery of Function , Adult , Aged , Autografts , Benzylamines , Cyclams , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged
16.
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant ; 26(4): 683-690, 2020 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31682979

ABSTRACT

Allogeneic stem cell transplant (alloSCT) is considered in diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients with chemorefractory disease or who have relapsed after autologous SCT. Here we present the first report of alloSCT using the R-BEAM (rituximab, carmustine, etoposide, cytarabine, melphalan) conditioning regimen in DLBCL patients. We retrospectively compared long-term alloSCT outcomes of DLBCL patients who received either R-BEAM (n = 47) or reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) regimens (n = 23). Seventy patients (median age, 53 years) with DLBCL received alloSCT between January 2005 and December 2017. The median number of pretransplant therapies was 3, and 17 patients (24%) received prior autologous SCT. All received rituximab as a frontline or salvage therapy before alloSCT. The donor was unrelated in 42 patients (60%), and peripheral blood stem cells were commonly used (96%). The 6-month cumulative incidence of grades III to IV acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) was 36.2% and 8.7% for R-BEAM and RIC, respectively (P = .03). Median follow-up of surviving patients after R-BEAM and RIC was 3.1 and 5.5 years, respectively. Three-year overall survival (OS) after R-BEAM and RIC was 34.4% and 43.4%, respectively (P = .48). At 3 years, R-BEAM was associated with a similar relapse rate (25.5% versus 26.1%, P = .96), nonrelapse mortality (NRM; 39.7% versus 39.1%, P = .98), and relapse-free survival (RFS; 34.8% versus 34.7%, P = .75) compared with RIC. In multivariable analysis lower Karnofsky performance score was associated with lower OS (hazard ratio, .96; P = .05), whereas chemorefractory disease was associated with a higher relapse risk (hazard ratio, 8.8; P = .04). No difference in OS, relapse, NRM, or RFS was noticed between R-BEAM and RIC. R-BEAM regimen seems to be feasible and results in equivalent rates of long-term OS, relapse, NRM, and RFS compared with RIC. However, a significantly higher rate of severe acute GVHD was noticed.


Subject(s)
Graft vs Host Disease , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Lymphoma, Large B-Cell, Diffuse , Humans , Lymphoma, Large B-Cell, Diffuse/therapy , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local , Retrospective Studies , Stem Cell Transplantation , Transplantation Conditioning
17.
Am J Hematol ; 94(10): 1072-1080, 2019 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31292984

ABSTRACT

Liver Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is common in patients with post-transplant liver dysfunction following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (AHSCT). Oftentimes, the diagnosis is made clinically, and liver biopsy is deferred. Our objective was to evaluate the risk factors and clinical outcomes of liver GVHD among patients who developed post-transplant liver dysfunction. Additionally, we evaluated the feasibility of liver biopsy in this population. We compared outcomes between liver GVHD and a "non-liver GVHD" group, which consisted of other etiologies of post-transplant liver dysfunction. Between January 2003 and December 2010, 249 patients developed post-transplant liver dysfunction following AHSCT: 124 patients developed liver GVHD and 125 were in the "non-liver GVHD" group. The incidence of acute and chronic liver GVHD at one year was 15.7% and 31.0%, respectively. The competing risk analysis revealed full intensity conditioning regimen (Hazard ratio [HR], 1.76; P = .008) and related donor (HR, 1.68; P = .004) as independent risk factors for liver GVHD. The time-varying covariate Cox regression analysis with competing risk event, demonstrated that liver GVHD was independently associated with higher non-relapse mortality, and adverse relapse-free and overall survival. A total of 112 liver biopsies were performed in 100 patients. No major complications were observed. Liver biopsy confirmed prebiopsy hypotheses in 49% of cases, and led to treatment modification in 49% of patients. Our study shows that liver GVHD is associated with adverse survival. Liver biopsy is safe and often helps directing care in this setting.


Subject(s)
Biopsy/methods , Graft vs Host Disease/etiology , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Liver Failure/etiology , Adult , Allografts , Biopsy/adverse effects , Disease-Free Survival , Feasibility Studies , Graft vs Host Disease/blood , Graft vs Host Disease/pathology , Graft vs Host Disease/prevention & control , Hematologic Neoplasms/mortality , Hematologic Neoplasms/therapy , Hemorrhage/etiology , Humans , Hyperbilirubinemia/etiology , Immunosuppressive Agents/therapeutic use , Incidence , Iron Overload/complications , Liver/pathology , Liver Failure/blood , Liver Failure/mortality , Liver Failure/pathology , Myelodysplastic Syndromes/mortality , Myelodysplastic Syndromes/therapy , Proportional Hazards Models , Risk Factors , Transplantation Conditioning/adverse effects , Treatment Outcome
19.
Leuk Lymphoma ; 60(11): 2762-2770, 2019 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31010370

ABSTRACT

Information on the use of hypomethylating agents (HMAs) as a pre-transplant cytoreductive therapy in MDS is limited. We retrospectively evaluated outcomes of 172 adult MDS patients, who underwent allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation between January 2000 and December 2016. Patients were divided into three groups: group 1 - pre-transplant blasts <5% with HMA (n = 42), group 2 - pre-transplant blasts ≥5% with HMA (n = 38), group 3 - no HMA (n = 92). With a median follow up of 4.08 years, 1-year survival and relapse rates for groups 1, 2, and 3 were 75%, 40.2%, and 60.71%, respectively; and 17.6%, 26.6%, and 9.8%, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed adverse relapse (HR 3.54; p = .03) in group 2 compared to groups 1 and 3, while no difference in overall survival was noticed. Our study shows no survival association with pre-transplant HMA; although, higher relapse rate was observed in the non-responding patients indicating possible chemotherapy resistant disease.


Subject(s)
DNA Methylation , Decitabine/therapeutic use , Graft Survival , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/mortality , Myelodysplastic Syndromes/mortality , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/mortality , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic/therapeutic use , Combined Modality Therapy , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Myelodysplastic Syndromes/pathology , Myelodysplastic Syndromes/therapy , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/pathology , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/therapy , Retrospective Studies , Survival Rate , Transplantation, Homologous , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...