Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 9 de 9
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Publication year range
1.
Ann Chir Plast Esthet ; 68(2): 167-172, 2023 Apr.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36463024

ABSTRACT

Lipofilling is a well-known procedure, initially described by Coleman in 1991. Many cases of fat embolism following this procedure are published. Our patient had a common carotid fat embolism after a temporal autologous fat graft.


Subject(s)
Embolism, Fat , Pulmonary Embolism , Humans , Adipose Tissue/transplantation , Embolism, Fat/etiology , Carotid Artery, Common , Transplantation, Autologous/methods
2.
J Pak Med Assoc ; 70(9): 1577-1582, 2020 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33040112

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the success, degree of difficulty and completion time of endotracheal intubation without removing the endotracheal tube in the event of an oesophageal intubation.. METHODS: The prospective, randomised crossover study was conducted at Gulhane Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey, from July 1, 2018, to August 31, 2018, and used a manikin model. Endotracheal intubation was performed using Miller, Macintosh blades and a video laryngoscope. The procedures were randomised into two groups, with group E+ being subjected to it while an endotracheal tube ETT was placed in the oesophagus (E+) simulating the oesophageal intubation, and control group E- getting the standard procedure without the endotracheal tube in the oesophagus. All methods were evaluated for their success, completion time, and degree of difficulty. Data was analysed using SPSS 22. RESULTS: There were 120 manikins, with 60(50%) in each of the two groups. The mean completion time with Miller in E+ group was 19.05±9.65 and for E- it was 17.55±11.95 seconds. With Macintosh, E+ had a mean completion time of 19.85±12.66 seconds and E- had 16.75±8.66. With video laryngoscope, E+ group had a mean completion time of 16.75±8.66 seconds, while E- had it 14.60±8.17. No significant difference was found in the paired group comparisons in terms of the degree of task difficulty (p>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In case of inadvertent oesophageal intubation condition, leaving the tube in the oesophagus and performing subsequent endotracheal intubation attempts was not found to decrease the rate of success regardless of the laryngoscope type.


Subject(s)
Intubation, Intratracheal , Manikins , Cross-Over Studies , Esophagus , Humans , Laryngoscopy , Prospective Studies , Turkey
3.
Emerg Med Int ; 2019: 5804260, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31737366

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The present study evaluates the success and efficacy of endotracheal intubation (ETI) using a modified intubation stylet and a magnet system to direct the stylet into the trachea. The system was developed by the researchers in an attempt to increase the success and efficacy of ETI. METHODS: ETI procedures were performed on an airway management manikin by emergency medical technicians with at least four years of experience in ETI. The technicians used a stylet modified with an iron ball affixed to the tip and a neodymium magnet, designed specifically for the study. The intention was to guide the endotracheal tube into the trachea at the level of the thyroid and cricoid cartilages on the manikin with the aid of the modified stylet and the magnetic force of the neodymium magnet. The success rate, completion time, and degree of difficulty of two procedures were compared: magnetic endotracheal intubation (METI) and classic ETI (CETI). RESULTS: The success rate was 100% in both groups. The mean completion times for the METI and CETI procedures were 18.31 ± 2.46 s and 20.01 ± 1.95 s, respectively. There were significant differences in completion time and degree of difficulty between the METI and CETI procedures (both p=0.001). CONCLUSIONS: We found the use of a neodymium magnet and modified stylet to be an effective method to guide the endotracheal tube into the trachea. The present study may provide a basis for future studies.

4.
Saudi Med J ; 40(10): 996-1002, 2019 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31588477

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To compare the efficacy of ShotBlocker and cold spray in reducing intramuscular (IM) injection-related pain in adults. Methos: A prospective, randomized, controlled study carried out between January 2018 and March 2018 at the Department of Emergency Medicine, Acibadem Mehmet Ali Aydinlar University, School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey. Adult patients receiving IM injection of diclofenac sodium (75 mg/3 ml) were included. The patients were randomized into 3 groups: ShotBlocker, cold spray, and control. Each group comprised 40 patients. Patients were instructed to rate the intensity of IM injection-related pain using a 100-mm visual analog scale (VAS). Visual analog scale scores of the patients were statistically analyzed. Results: Visual analog scale scores were lower in the ShotBlocker (11 mm) and cold spray (10 mm) groups than in the control group (31 mm) (p=0.001). There were no significant differences in VAS scores between the ShotBlocker and cold spray groups. The operators' responses revealed that ShotBlocker was more difficult to administer than cold spray. Conclusion: ShotBlocker is an effective non-pharmacological method that reduces IM injection-related pain and is similar in efficacy, to cold spray.


Subject(s)
Cryotherapy , Injections, Intramuscular/adverse effects , Pain, Procedural/prevention & control , Adult , Cold Temperature , Cryotherapy/methods , Female , Humans , Injections, Intramuscular/instrumentation , Injections, Intramuscular/methods , Male , Pain Measurement , Prospective Studies
5.
J R Army Med Corps ; 164(5): 343-346, 2018 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29626144

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Cannulation for the administration of intravenous fluids is integral to the prehospital management of injured military patients. However, this may be technically challenging to undertake during night-time conditions where the use of light to aid cannulation may give the tactical situation away to opponents. The aim of this study was to investigate the success and tactical safety of venepuncture under battlefield conditions with different colour light sources. METHOD: The procedure was carried out with naked eye in a bright room in the absence of a separate light source, with a naked eye in a dark room under red, white, blue and green light sources and under an infrared light source while wearing night vision goggles (NVGs). The success, safety, degree of difficulty and completion time for each procedure were then explored. RESULTS: All interventions made in daylight and in a dark room were found to be 100% successful. Interventions performed under infrared light while wearing NVGs took longer than under other light sources or in daylight. Interventions performed under blue light were tactically safer when compared with interventions performed under different light sources. CONCLUSION: Blue light offered the best tactical safety during intravenous cannulation under night-time conditions and is recommended for future use in tactical casualty care. The use of NVGs using infrared light cannot be recommended if there is the possibility of opponents having access to the technology.


Subject(s)
Darkness , Infusions, Intravenous/methods , Lighting/instrumentation , Humans , Military Medicine , Warfare
6.
Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg ; 24(2): 97-103, 2018 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29569679

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Endotracheal intubation (ETI) procedure in the combat area differs from prehospital trauma life support procedures because of the danger of gunfire and the dark environment. We aimed to determine the success, difficulty degree, and duration of ETI procedures with a classical laryngoscope (CL) in a bright room and with a modified laryngoscope (ML) model in a dark room. METHODS: All interventions were performed by a combatant medical staff of 10 members. We developed an ML model to obtain a tool that can be used in combination with night vision goggles (NVGs) to perform ETI at night. The procedures were performed using a CL with the naked eye in a bright room and using a ML with NVGs in a dark room. The ETI procedure that used the ML was performed by engaging and locking the blade on the handle either in the mouth (ML-IM) or outside of the mouth (ML-OM). RESULTS: The mean completion times for the ETI procedures, namely Day-CL, ML-OM+NVG, and ML-IM+NVG, performed by the operators were 14.46, 26.9, and 32.38 s, respectively. The ML-OM+NVG and ML-IM+NVG procedures were significantly longer than the Day-CL procedure (p<0.05). The ML-IM+NVG procedure was significantly longer than the ML-OM+NVG procedure (p<0.05). All ETI procedures were found to be 100% successful. The Day-CL procedure was easier than the ML-OM+NVG and ML-IM+NVG procedures (p>0.05). CONCLUSION: The ETI procedure is applicable using NVGs in dark conditions on the battlefield. Medical interventions performed using NVGs in the dark should be a part of the basic training provided in tactical emergency medicine.


Subject(s)
Intubation, Intratracheal/instrumentation , Laryngoscopes , Military Medicine/instrumentation , Optical Devices , Humans , Night Vision
7.
Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg ; 23(6): 459-465, 2017 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29115646

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In the patients with multiple and serious trauma, early applications of life-saving procedures are related to improved survival. We tried to experimentally determine the feasibility of life-saving interventions that are performed with the aid of night vision goggles (NVG) in nighttime combat scenario. METHODS: Chest tube thoracostomy (CTT), emergency cricothyroidotomy (EC), and needle thoracostomy (NT) interventions were performed by 10 combatant medical staff. The success and duration of interventions were explored in the study. Procedures were performed on the formerly prepared manikins/models in a bright room and in a dark room with the aid of NVG. Operators graded the ease of interventions. RESULTS: All interventions were found successful. Operators stated that both CTT and EC interventions were more difficult in dark than in daytime (p<0.05). No significant difference was observed in the difficulty in the NT interventions. No significant difference was observed in terms of completion times of interventions between in daytime and in dark scenario. CONCLUSION: The operators who use NVGs have to be aware of that they can perform their tactic and medical activities without taking off the NVGs and without the requirement of an extra light source.


Subject(s)
Emergency Medicine , Eyeglasses , Military Medicine , Night Vision , Thoracostomy/methods , Thoracotomy/methods , Humans , Lighting , Manikins
8.
Mil Med ; 182(7): e1722-e1725, 2017 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28810964

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Strict blackout discipline is extremely important for all military units. To be able to effectively determine wound characteristics and perform the necessary interventions at nighttime, vision and light restrictions can be mitigated through the use of tactical night vision goggles (NVGs). The lamp of the classical laryngoscope (CL) can be seen with the naked eye; infrared light, on the other hand, cannot be perceived without the use of NVGs. The aim of the study is to evaluate the safety of endotracheal intubation (ETI) procedures in the dark under tactically safe conditions with modified laryngoscope (ML) model. METHODS: We developed an ML model by changing the standard lamp on a CL with an infrared light-emitting diode lamp to obtain a tool which can be used to perform ETI under night conditions in combination with NVGs. We first evaluated the safety of ETI procedures in prehospital conditions under darkness by using both the CL and the ML for the study, and then researched the procedures and methods by which ETI procedure could be performed in the dark under tactically safe conditions. In addition, to better ensure light discipline in the field of combat, we also researched the benefits, from a light discipline standpoint, of using the poncho liner (PL) and of taking advantage of the oropharyngeal region during ETIs performed by opening the laryngoscope blades directly in the mouth and using a cover. During the ETI procedures performed on the field, two experienced combatant staff simulated the enemy by determining whether the light from the two different types of laryngoscope could be seen at 100-m intervals up to 1,500 m. RESULTS: In all scenarios, performing observations with an NVG was more advantageous for the enemy than with the naked eye. The best measure that can be taken against this threat by the paramedic is to ensure tactical safety by having an ML and by opening the ML inside the mouth with the aid of a PL. The findings of the study are likely to shed light on the tactical safety of ETI performed with NVGs under darkness. CONCLUSION: Considering this finding, we still strongly recommend that it would be relatively safer to open the ML blade inside the mouth and to perform the procedures under a PL. In chaotic environments where it might become necessary to provide civilian health services for humanitarian aid purposes (Red Crescent, Red Cross, etc.) without NVGs, we believe that it would be relatively safer to open the CL blade inside the mouth and to perform the procedures under a PL.


Subject(s)
Darkness/adverse effects , Intubation, Intratracheal/methods , Intubation, Intratracheal/standards , Humans , Laryngoscopes/adverse effects , Laryngoscopes/trends , Military Personnel/education , Night Vision , Warfare
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...