Management of Priapism: Results of a Nationwide Survey and Comparison with International Guidelines.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to evaluate current urologic practice regarding the management of priapism in Turkey and compare with international guidelines. METHODS: Urologists and urology residents were invited to an online survey consisting of 30 multiple-choice questions on priapism-related clinical practices that were consid- ered most important and relevant to practices by using Google Forms. RESULTS: Total number of responses was 340. Respondents reported that they recorded a detailed patient's medical history and physical examination findings (n = 340, 100%) and laboratory testing, which includes corporal blood gas analysis (n=323, 95%). Participants announced that they performed Doppler ultrasound for 1/4 cases (n = 106, 31%), but 22% of the participants (n=75) replied that they performed in >75% of cases. Participants (n=311, 91%) responded that the first-line treatment of ischemic priapism is decompression of the corpus cavernosum. Moreover, most respondents (n = 320, 94%) stated that sympathomimetic injection drugs should be applied as the second step. About three-quarters of respondents (n = 247, 73%) indicated adrenaline as their drug of choice. Phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors seems to be the most pre- ferred drug for stuttering priapism (n=141, 41%). Participants (n=284, 84%) replied that corpora-glanular shunts should be preferred as the first. A large number of par- ticipants (n = 239, 70%) declared that magnetic resonance imaging can be performed in cases with delayed (>24 hours) priapism to diagnose corporal necrosis. Most of the participants (84%) responded that penile prosthesis should be preferred to shunts in cases with delayed (>48 hours) priapism. CONCLUSION: It would be appropriate to improve the training offered by professional associations and to give more training time to the management of priapism during residency.

The Role of Educational Level and Cognitive Status in Men Undergoing Artificial Urinary Sphincter Implantation.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the relationship between education level, cognitive function of patients and the success/ revision rates of artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) implantation in men with postprostatectomy incontinence. METHODS: Between January 2010 and March 2018, 163 patients (mean age, 68 ± 6.8 years) with moderate-to-severe stress urinary incontinence who underwent AUS implantation were retrospectively examined. Demographic data, body mass index, comorbidities, surgical technique, previous strictures, and radiation therapy were recorded. Incontinence was measured by daily pad use and evaluated by International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-short form. Patients' overall improvement was assessed using the Patient Global Impression of Improvement questionnaire. Education level was determined using the International Standard Classification of Education. Cognitive status was assessed using the Mini-Mental State Examination. Treatment success was defined as the need for ≤1 pad/day at last follow-up. RESULTS: AUS was successful in 77.3% of patients. The International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-short form score improved significantly from 19.9 ± 2.9 to 4.4 ± 5.4 (P = .001). The median outcome reported subjectively on the Patient Global Impression of Improvement scale was 2.1 ± 1.5 (1-7) and self-reported as "much better." Patients' education level had statistically no significant relationship with AUS success and revision rates. Similarly, there was no significant relationship between cognitive status, educational level and the need for revision of AUS (P >.05). However, patients with moderate cognitive impairment and a body mass index >30 showed significantly lower AUS success rates (P <.05). CONCLUSION: AUS implantation is safe and effective treatment option especially for nonobese and cognitively intact patients of all educational levels.

Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in solitary kidneys: effective, safe and improves renal functions.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate success and complication rates of endourological stone treatments and to evaluate effects of percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) on renal functions, in patients with solitary kidneys. METHODS: In our center, 3150 patients underwent PCNL between 2003 and 2017 and 142 patients underwent retrograd intrarenal surgery (RIRS) between 2013 and 2017. We retrospectively analysed the data of 82 patients with solitary kidney who underwent PCNL and of 8 patients with solitary kidney who underwent RIRS. Complications were classified according to Clavien-Dindo Classification system. Serum creatinin was measured before the procedure, on the early postoperative period and at sixth month follow-up in PCNL group. The estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was calculated using Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) formula. The 5-stage classification of chronic kidney disease (CKD) was used according to the National Kidney Foundation guideline. RESULTS: In the PCNL group, the initial stone-free and success rates were 82.9% and 95.1%, respectively. Complications occured in 18 (22%) patients. Transfusion was the most common complication (15.5%). One patient required JJ stenting. The stone-free rates of the patients who required multiple accesses were statistically lower than the patients who required single access (P=0.01). Transfusion rates were statistically higher in patients who required multiple accesses and who had complex stones (P=0.01 and P=0.02, respectively). GFRs calculated preoperatively, in the early and in the late period were 65.03, 62.85 (P=0.224) and 70.63 mL/min/1.73 m2 (P<0.001), respectively. At the postoperative 6th month, GFR was stable in CKD stage 1 patients and improved in CKD stage 2-4 patients (P<0.001, P<0.001 and P=0.012 respectively). In the RIRS group, 5 patients (62.5%) were stone free and the success rate was 75% (6 patients) after single procedure. Any complication did not occur in the RIRS group. CONCLUSIONS: PCNL in solitary kidney is a safe method with acceptable complication rates. Renal functions are preserved in patients with normal functioning kidney and improved in patients with renal insufficiency. RIRS may be an alternative method in selected patients with solitary kidney.

Upper pole access is safe and effective for pediatric percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

INTRODUCTION: Upper pole access in percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) provides a straight tract to the ureter, resulting in easier placement of a guidewire to the ureter, good exposure of the pelvis, calices, and upper ureter, and comfortable manipulations. However, despite these benefits, upper pole access is usually avoided because of the risk of chest complications in both pediatric and adult patients. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to evaluate the safety and morbidity of single upper pole access in pediatric patients undergoing PCNL. STUDY DESIGN: We retrospectively reviewed patients aged ≤17 years with renal stones who underwent PCNL with a single access between August 2004 and February 2016. The patients were separated into two groups: the single upper pole access group (SUPAG) and the single other pole access group (SOPAG). We compared the SUPAG and SOPAG in terms of the demographic features of the patients, stone burden and location, operative data, and postoperative outcomes. Complications were classified according to the modified Clavien system. RESULTS: During the study period, 101 PCNL procedures were performed, 77 of which were managed with only one access. The median age of the 77 patients managed with a single access was 12 years (range 3-17 years). The number of cases in the SUPAG and SOPAG was 10 and 67, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences between the SUPAG and SOPAG in terms of age, sex, stone location, hydronephrosis status, stone area, side of kidney, and previous stone treatment or renal surgery. Furthermoret, there were no significant differences between the groups in terms of the operative parameters. Although the difference was insignificant, the median operation times in the SUPAG and SOPAG were 37 and 45 min, respectively. There was no chest complication or bleeding that required transfusion in the SUPAG. Two cases required transfusion, and one case was managed with a double pigtail catheter (double-J) placement because of prolonged extravasation in the SOPAG. The stone-free ratios were 100% and 82.1% in the SUPAG and SOPAG, respectively. CONCLUSION: Upper pole access provides similar outcomes to other (middle and lower) pole accesses, and may be performed without serious complications. These results indicate that this is a safe and effective approach of PCNL, and it presents a good alternative for removal of renal stones in pediatric patients.

A Simple, Non - Biological Model for Percutaneous Renal Access Training.

PURPOSE: Percutaneous renal puncture (PRP) is one of the most important and critical step of urology, especially while performing percutaneous nephrostomy and percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). In the learning period of this procedures, there is a need for validated, effective, economical models for such training. This study describes a simple non - biological model for learning PRP. The aim was to determine the effectivity of this model as a training and assessment tool, and to assess its cost relative to other models. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We designed a training box, made of foam and rubber with two open sides and performed radiopaque pelvicalyceal system maquettes to insert inside it. Experts in PCNL (i.e., > 100 cases) andnovices (i.e., pediatric surgeons and urologists without PCNL experience) performed percutaneous renal puncture. Novices performed a pre -test and a post - test (i.e., after 2 hour training). Data recorded were total procedure time, X - ray exposure time, and number of puncture attempts. Experts who performed PRP successfully were asked torate the model using a questionnaire. RESULTS: Five experts and 21 novices completed the study. Four experts rated the model as an "excellent" (score 5) training and assessment tool; one expert rated these as "very good" (score 4). Comparisons of novices' pre - and post - test median results revealed significant skill acquisition with shorter procedure time, less X - ray exposure, and fewer attempts for successful puncture (all P < .001). CONCLUSION: This new non - biological training model is an effective training tool that helps learners improve skills in PRP. The model is simple to construct, economical, and highly re-useable compared to others. It provides good visibility and imaging, is portable, and could be used widely in training centres.

Liposarcoma of the spermatic cord: A case report.

Spermatic cord liposarcoma is very rare and characterized by a painless inguinal or scrotal mass. This is a case report of a 66-year-old man presenting with a mass in his left scrotum. Inguinal orchiectomy was performed and the histopathological examination revealed a liposarcoma of the spermatic cord.

Diagnostic accuracy of uriSed automated urine microscopic sediment analyzer and dipstick parameters in predicting urine culture test results.

INTRODUCTION: Urinary tract infection (UTI) is one of the most common types of infection. Currently, diagnosis is primarily based on microbiologic culture, which is time- and labor-consuming. The aim of this study was to assess the diagnostic accuracy of urinalysis results from UriSed (77 Electronica, Budapest, Hungary), an automated microscopic image-based sediment analyzer, in predicting positive urine cultures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We examined a total of 384 urine specimens from hospitalized patients and outpatients attending our hospital on the same day for urinalysis, dipstick tests and semi-quantitative urine culture. The urinalysis results were compared with those of conventional semiquantitative urine culture. RESULTS: Of 384 urinary specimens, 68 were positive for bacteriuria by culture, and were thus considered true positives. Comparison of these results with those obtained from the UriSed analyzer indicated that the analyzer had a specificity of 91.1%, a sensitivity of 47.0%, a positive predictive value (PPV) of 53.3% (95% confidence interval (CI) = 40.8-65.3), and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 88.8% (95% CI = 85.0-91.8%). The accuracy was 83.3% when the urine leukocyte parameter was used, 76.8% when bacteriuria analysis of urinary sediment was used, and 85.1% when the bacteriuria and leukocyturia parameters were combined. The presence of nitrite was the best indicator of culture positivity (99.3% specificity) but had a negative likelihood ratio of 0.7, indicating that it was not a reliable clinical test. CONCLUSIONS: Although the specificity of the UriSed analyzer was within acceptable limits, the sensitivity value was low. Thus, UriSed urinalysis resuIts do not accurately predict the outcome of culture.