Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
PLoS One ; 11(12): e0166711, 2016.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27936236

ABSTRACT

Development of a globally effective HIV-1 vaccine will need to encompass Nigeria, one of the hardest hit areas, with an estimated 3.2 million people living with HIV. This cross-sectional Institutional Review Board (IRB) approved study was conducted in 2009-12 at four market sites and two highway settlements sites in Nigeria to identify and characterize populations at high risk for HIV; engage support of local stakeholders; and assess the level of interest in future vaccine studies. Demographic, HIV risk data were collected by structured interviewer-administered questionnaires. Blood samples were tested on site by HIV rapid diagnostic tests, followed by rigorous confirmatory testing, subtype evaluation and testing for HBV and HCV markers in a clinical reference laboratory. Of 3229 study participants, 326 were HIV infected as confirmed by Western Blot or RNA, with a HIV prevalence of 15.4%-23.9% at highway settlements and 3.1%-9.1% at market sites. There was no observable correlation of prevalence of HIV-1 (10.1%) with HBV (10.9%) or HCV (2.9%). Major HIV-1 subtypes included CRF02_AG (37.5%); G (27.5%); G/CRF02_AG (25.9%); and non-typeable (8.9%), with 0.3% HIV-2. Univariate analysis found age, gender, marital status, level of education, and sex under substance influence as significant risk factors for HIV (p<0.001). Educating and winning the trust of local community leadership ensured high level of participation (53.3-77.9%) and willingness to participate in future studies (95%). The high HIV prevalence and high risk of HIV infection at highway settlement and mammy markets make them well suited for targeting future vaccine trials in Nigeria.


Subject(s)
AIDS Vaccines/immunology , Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome/immunology , HIV Infections/immunology , HIV-1/immunology , AIDS Vaccines/administration & dosage , Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome/prevention & control , Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome/virology , Adolescent , Adult , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , HIV Infections/epidemiology , HIV Infections/virology , HIV-1/physiology , Hepatitis B/epidemiology , Hepatitis C/epidemiology , Host-Pathogen Interactions/drug effects , Host-Pathogen Interactions/immunology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Nigeria/epidemiology , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Prevalence , Risk Factors , Surveys and Questionnaires , Young Adult
2.
J Clin Microbiol ; 53(11): 3501-6, 2015 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26311857

ABSTRACT

The availability of reliable human immunodeficiency virus types 1 and 2 (HIV-1/2) rapid tests in resource-limited settings represents an important advancement in the accurate diagnosis of HIV infection and presents opportunities for implementation of effective prevention and treatment interventions among vulnerable populations. A study of the potential target populations for future HIV vaccine studies examined the prevalence of HIV infections at six selected sites in Nigeria and evaluated the use of two rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) for HIV. The populations included market workers at sites adjacent to military installations and workers at highway settlements (truck stops) who may have a heightened risk of HIV exposure. Samples from 3,187 individuals who provided informed consent were tested in parallel using the Determine (DT) and Stat-Pak (SP) RDTs; discordant results were subjected to the Uni-Gold (UG) RDT as a tiebreaker. The results were compared to those of a third-generation enzyme immunoassay screen with confirmation of repeat reactive samples by HIV-1 Western blotting. One participant was HIV-2 infected, yielding positive results on both RDTs. Using the laboratory algorithm as a gold standard, we calculated sensitivities of 98.5% (confidence interval [CI], 97.1 to 99.8%) for DT and 98.1% (CI, 96.7 to 99.6%) for SP and specificities of 98.7% (CI, 98.3 -99.1%) for DT and 99.8% (CI, 99.6 to 100%) for SP. Similar results were obtained when the sites were stratified into those of higher HIV prevalence (9.4% to 22.8%) versus those of lower prevalence (3.2% to 7.3%). A parallel two-test algorithm requiring both DT and SP to be positive resulted in the highest sensitivity (98.1%; CI, 96.7 to 99.6%) and specificity (99.97%; CI, 99.9 to 100%) relative to those for the reference laboratory algorithm.


Subject(s)
Diagnostic Tests, Routine/methods , HIV Infections/diagnosis , HIV Infections/epidemiology , HIV-1/immunology , HIV-2/immunology , Immunoassay/methods , AIDS Vaccines/therapeutic use , False Negative Reactions , False Positive Reactions , Female , HIV Antibodies , HIV-1/genetics , HIV-2/genetics , Humans , Nigeria/epidemiology , RNA, Viral/analysis , RNA, Viral/genetics , Sensitivity and Specificity
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...