ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Lung transplant (LT) is one of the therapeutic options for patients with terminal respiratory diseases. It is highly important to incorporate the functional status and frailty assessment into the selection process of candidates for LT. OBJECTIVES: Identify the prevalence of frailty in the LT waiting list. Study the relationship between frailty, functional status, Lung Allocation Score (LAS) and muscular dysfunction. METHODOLOGY: Descriptive transversal study of patients on the waiting list for LT. POPULATION: 74 patients with chronic respiratory diseases assessed by the lung transplant committee and accepted to be transplanted in a university hospital in Barcelona. The outcome variables were frailty status was evaluate for SPPB test, functional capacity was evaluate for the six-minute walking test (6MWT) and muscular dysfunction. The results were analyzed with the statistical package STATA 12. RESULTS: Sample of 48 men and 26 women, with a median age of 56.55 years (SD 10.87. The prevalence of frailty assessed with the SPPB was 33.8% (8.1% are in frailty and 25.7% are in a state of pre-frailty). There is a relationship between the SPPB, 6MWT and maximal inspiratory pressure, but not with others force values. There is a relationship between the risk of frailty (scores below 9 in SPPB) and the meters walked in 6 but not with the LAS. CONCLUSIONS: The risk of frailty in patients with terminal chronic respiratory diseases is high. Frailty is related with functional capacity, but not with LAS.
Subject(s)
Frailty , Functional Status , Lung Transplantation , Walk Test , Humans , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Cross-Sectional Studies , Waiting Lists , Aged , Prevalence , Maximal Respiratory Pressures , Patient SelectionABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The development of reliable alternatives to conventional hospitalization in patients with cancer would have great clinical and economical value. The aim of the present study was to assess the feasibility of a home-based nursing intervention model as a safe alternative for the management of acute medical complications in cancer patients who would otherwise require conventional hospitalization. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From October 2013 to October 2014, we prospectively evaluated the outcomes of consecutive acute medical episodes treated at home under the home-based intervention program named the Bridge Project (BP). Episodes were classified as "avoided hospitalization in outpatients" (AHO) vs. "reduced hospitalization in inpatients" (RHI). The primary end-point was to assess the rate and causes of BP intervention failure (unplanned hospital readmission or death). RESULTS: Two hundred and forty-six consecutive episodes (52 % AHO and 48 % RHI) involving 203 patients (55 % male; mean age 63 years) were enrolled. The main conditions managed at home were non-neutropenic infections (40 %), febrile neutropenia (20 %), and cancer-related complications (28 %). The median duration of the BP intervention was 5 days (range 1-16 days). No deaths were reported at home. Unplanned hospital readmissions occurred in 9 % of episodes (14 % in AHO vs. 4 % in RHI; p = 0.001). Five of the 22 readmitted patients (22.7 % of the BP failures; 2.5 % of the whole series) died during hospitalization. The BP intervention burden was 1353 days, representing a potential saving of 14 % of days of hospitalization during the study period. CONCLUSIONS: The BP is a safe intervention which can potentially avoid or reduce the length of hospitalization in selected cancer patients with acute medical complications. Our findings support further development of innovative home-based clinical approaches to promote potentially avoidable hospitalization in this setting.
