Liver Transplantation for Severe Alcoholic Hepatitis: Report of a Single Center Pilot Program.

BACKGROUND: Liver transplantation (LT) can significantly improve mortality for severe alcoholic hepatitis (AH). However, this practice remains controversial. Our aim is to report the findings from our institution regarding outcomes for LT in severe AH and to discuss the results of a pilot program for discharging selected patients with close follow-up, in order to demonstrate sustained outpatient sobriety before listing. METHODS: Patient records were reviewed retrospectively from January 1, 2015 to January 17, 2018. The primary outcomes were patient and graft survival after LT. Secondary outcomes included relapse rates after LT, survival for those not transplanted, and reasons for denial among those not approved for transplant listing. RESULTS: A total of 18 patients with severe AH were considered for LT, of which 10 were transplanted and 8 were either denied transplantation or died before completing the evaluation. Patient and graft survival rates were 100% among those transplanted, and only 1 of the 10 patients (10%) returned to harmful drinking. In comparison, 6 of 8 (75%) of patients not transplanted died. Among the 10 patients transplanted, 4 were initially not approved for listing and were discharged with close follow-up, to demonstrate outpatient sobriety. All 4 of those patients demonstrated short-term abstinence and ultimately underwent transplantation, with no instances of relapse post-LT. CONCLUSIONS: Liver transplantation for AH can achieve excellent outcomes with low rates of relapse. Carefully selected patients can be discharged with close monitoring to demonstrate commitment to outpatient sobriety prior to transplant listing.

Systematic review with meta-analysis: the proportion of chronic hepatitis B patients with normal alanine transaminase ≤ 40 IU/L and significant hepatic fibrosis.

BACKGROUND: Chronic hepatitis B (CHB) may lead to cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma and premature death. Elevated alanine transaminase (ALT) levels ≥ the upper limit of normal (ULN) are a major determinant for initiating anti-viral therapy; however, ALT levels alone may not be predictive of hepatic fibrosis. AIM: To determine the proportion of CHB patients with ALT ≤ 40 IU/L and liver fibrosis stage ≥ 2. Secondary goals include subgroup analysis by hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) status, high hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA levels, Asian ethnicity, lower ULN of ≤ 30 IU/L (males) and 19 IU/L (females), and advanced age. METHODS: Studies identified in EMBASE and MEDLINE (1/1990-6/2012) using the search criteria: "Hepatitis B"[Mesh] OR "Hepatitis B virus"[Mesh] OR "Hepatitis B, Chronic"[Mesh])) AND "Alanine Transaminase"[Mesh]) and abstracts containing the term 'hepatitis' from recent major U.S. gastroenterology and liver society meetings were considered. RESULTS: Among nine studies (N = 830 patients), a significant proportion (20.7%; 95% CI: 16.2-26.0%) of CHB patients with ALT levels ≤ 40 IU/L had significant fibrosis irrespective of HBeAg status, high HBV DNA levels, ethnicity or age, although this proportion may be higher in patients older than 30-40 years old. The corresponding proportion was 27.8% even when the newer ULN of 30 IU/L (males) and 19 IU/L (females) was applied. CONCLUSIONS: Approximately one fifth of CHB patients with ALT ≤ 40 IU/L may have significant hepatic fibrosis. The approach to such patients should be individualised, as further evaluation and treatment may be appropriate.

Review article: current antiviral therapy of chronic hepatitis B.

BACKGROUND: The indications and endpoints for treatment of chronic hepatitis B continue to evolve. The aim of the therapy for chronic hepatitis B is to achieve a long-term continued suppression of the hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA to prevent disease progression leading to the development of cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. AIM: To summarise current literature on therapy of chronic hepatitis B, with a focus on indications for therapy, preferred treatment options, and management of resistance and partial responders. METHODS: A systematic review of the literature, with a focus on international guidelines, was performed. RESULTS: Seven drugs are licensed for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B in many countries. The selection of a drug with high potency and low rate of resistance is essential to achieve rapid and long-term viral suppression. The prevention of the sequelae of antiviral drug resistance and appropriate management of viral breakthrough are major goals of current management. The addition or change to an antiviral agent that is not cross-resistant is critical to restore suppression of viral replication for patients with breakthrough resistance. Patient adherence to medication is essential to achieve adequate HBV DNA suppression. CONCLUSIONS: The current treatment strategy of chronic hepatitis B is now standard: initial selection of entecavir, tenofovir, or peginterferon alfa-2a. Future studies are required to determine if combination therapy using two oral agents or peginterferon with an oral agent with a high genetic barrier to resistance might be superior to standard current monotherapy.

Review article: current antiviral therapy of chronic hepatitis B.

BACKGROUND: The long-term goals of therapy for chronic hepatitis B are to reduce serum HBV DNA to low or undetectable levels and ultimately reduce or prevent the development of cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. AIM: To review the current treatment of chronic hepatitis B, with a focus on diagnosis and management of resistance and active management of suboptimal responses. METHODS: A systematic review of the literature, with a focus on recent guidelines, was undertaken. RESULTS: Among the six drugs licensed for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B in the US, the preferred agents in 2008 will include entecavir, peginterferon alfa-2a, possibly telbivudine, and tenofovir following licensure. When using an oral agent, a major focus of management is on the selection of a drug with high potency and low rate of resistance, and active on-treatment management to optimize therapy. Preventing the sequelae of antiviral drug resistance and appropriate management when resistance is initially detected are also the major focus of current management. The addition of an antiviral agent that is not cross-resistant is critical to restore suppression of viral replication. CONCLUSIONS: Newer agents and modified treatment strategies, especially using combination therapy, hold promise to optimize the management of patients with chronic hepatitis B by achieving the high potency and the lowest rate of resistance.