MRI Accurately Predicts Quadrupled Semitendinosus Autograft Size Using Posterior Hamstring Harvest for ACL Reconstruction.

Purpose: To determine the effectiveness of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) measurements of the cross-sectional area (CSA) of the semitendinosus tendon in predicting the intraoperative quadrupled semitendinosus graft diameter of a posteriorly harvested hamstring autograft for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. Methods: A retrospective review of patients who underwent ACL reconstruction with autograft using a posterior hamstring harvest was performed. Patient demographics and operative reports were reviewed, and measurements of the CSA of the semitendinosus on MRI were performed. Multiple linear regression was used to analyze the predictors for graft diameter. A P value < .05 was considered statistically significant. Interrater and intrarater reliability were calculated. Results: 280 patients were included. Patient height (P < .0001), and CSA of the semitendinosus (P < .0001) were significant predictors. Patients shorter than 63 inches had an average graft diameter of 7.89 mm compared to 8.69 mm for patients above 63 in (P < .001). The formula for the model is as follows: Graft diameter (mm2) = 2.74 + .067·Height (in) + .00009 · Weight (lbs) + .0018 · Age (years) +.12·Gender (1 if M, 0 if F) + 8.56 · CSA (cm2). The R2 for the model (0.5620), was greater than models using only height (R2 = .4092) or only CSA Semitendinosus (R2 = .3932). None of the interaction terms between covariates (e.g., height, weight, age, gender) were significant. Age (P =.6400), weight (P = .9970), and gender (P = .6700) were not significant predictors. Both intraclass (ICC = 0.864, 95% CI=[0.791, 0.912]) and interclass correlation (ICC=0.827, 95% CI=[0.715, 0.894]) showed good reliability. Conclusion: CSA semitendinosus tendon and patient height independently perform similarly as predictors of graft diameter. When used together, CSA and height accurately predict the graft diameter. In particular, for patients under 63 in tall who demonstrated an average graft diameter below the minimum 8 mm, as suggested by the literature, this may be a useful tool for preoperative planning of patients intending to undergo ACL reconstruction with posterior hamstring harvest. Level of Evidence: Level III, diagnostic: retrospective cohort study.

Acetabular Fracture Outcomes and Complications: An International Comparison.

Introduction: Despite the groundbreaking research by Judet and Letournel in the 1960s, the specific equipment, surgical approach, fixation strategy, and post-operative course for treating acetabular fractures have not been standardized. Therefore, this study aimed to compare technological resources, operative procedures, and post-operative complications between patients treated for acetabular fractures in Romania and the United States (U.S.). Methods: Between February 2011 and August 2018, a total of 116 Romanian patients and 373 U.S. patients underwent open reduction and internal fixation for acetabular fractures. Data were collected prospectively for Romania and retrospectively for the U.S. The authors used T-tests, Fisher's exact tests, and odds ratios to analyze categorical data while ordinal date were assessed using logistic regression. Results: U.S. patients had higher comorbidity rates for diabetes, obesity, and hypertension. However, the initial quality of reduction, graded with Matta's criteria, was similar between American and Romanian patients. Post-operatively, U.S. patients had significantly higher Brooker criteria scores for heterotopic ossification. Rates of deep vein thrombosis, infections, sciatic nerve lesions, and loss of reduction between the two countries were not significantly different. Conclusions: Given the similar initial reduction quality despite technological differences, the authors suggest that fundamental factors, such as surgeon training and experience, may have a greater impact than the availability of technologically advanced operative resources. Future research focusing on the efficacy of these advanced resources for acetabular fracture fixation could help determine their true impact on patient outcomes and improve the cost-effectiveness of this surgery.

Perceived Value of Public Health and Health Policy Information Among Medical Students: A Cross-sectional Study.

Introduction: Health educators have had difficulty introducing health policy and public health training into an already intensive medical school curriculum. Although the COVID-19 pandemic may have changed perspectives on the importance of public health, it may not change educational approaches. Assessment of medical student opinions and perceptions of health policy and public health might influence the weight given to these topics in medical education. Methods: We used a 39-item instrument to cross-sectionally survey medical students, to assess their perceptions of the value of public health and health policy within their professional education. Results: One hundred two students completed the survey (13% response rate). Most students reported an interest in public health (94.1%) and health policy (92.2%). Although interested, most students lacked confidence in their knowledge of public health and health policy on both state (health policy 34.3% confident; public health 43.1%) and national (health policy 41.0%; public health 44.1%) levels. Most students perceived that their institution has not sufficiently prepared them to understand health policy (34% felt prepared) and most reported insufficient information to participate in policy discussions (30.3% sufficiently informed). Conclusions: Medical students reported an interest in public health and health policy while also reporting a lack of confidence in their level of preparedness to understand and participate in these fields, thus demonstrating a need for increased public health and health policy education within medical school curricula.

Managing Post-Operative Pain in Orthopedic Patients: An International Comparison.

Introduction: Opioids play a crucial role in post-operative pain management in America, but not in some other countries. We sought to determine if a discrepancy in opioid use between the United States (U.S.) and Romania, a country that administers opioids in a conservative fashion, would show in subjective pain control differences. Methods: Between May 23, 2019, and November 23, 2019, 244 Romanian patients and 184 American patients underwent total hip arthroplasty or the surgical treatment of the following fractures: bimalleolar ankle, distal radius, femoral neck, intertrochanteric, and tibial-fibular. Opioid and non-opioid analgesic medication use and subjective pain scores during the first and second 24 hours after surgery were analyzed. Results: Subjective pain scores for the first 24 hours were higher among patients in Romania compared to the U.S. (p < 0.0001), but Romanians reported lower pain scores than U.S. patients in the second 24-hours (p < 0.0001). The quantity of opioids given to U.S. patients did not differ significantly based on sex (p = 0.4258) or age (p = 0.0975). However, females reported higher pain scores than male patients following the studied procedures (p = 0.0181). No sex-based differences in pain scores were noted among Romanian patients. Conclusions: Higher pain scores in American females, despite equivalent amounts of narcotics to their male counterparts, and the absence of a difference in Romanians suggested that the current American post-operative pain regimen may be tailored to the needs of male patients. In addition, it pointed to the impacts of gender, compared to sex, in pain experiences. Future research should look for the safest, most efficacious pain regimen suitable for all patients.

Traumatic Peroneal Nerve Injuries: A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: The common peroneal nerve (CPN) is the most commonly injured peripheral nerve of the lower extremity in patients with trauma. Traumatic CPN injuries have historically been associated with relatively poor outcomes and patient satisfaction, although improved surgical technique and novel procedures appear to improve outcomes. Given the variety of underlying injury modalities, treatment options, and prognostic variables, we sought to evaluate and summarize the current literature on traumatic CPN injuries and to provide recommendations from an analysis of the included studies for treatment and future research. METHODS: A systematic review was performed using PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases per the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Search terms consisted of variations of "peroneal nerve" or "fibular nerve" combined with "injury," "laceration," "entrapment," "repair," or "neurolysis." Information with regard to treatment modality, outcomes, and patient demographic characteristics was recorded and analyzed. RESULTS: The initial search yielded 2,301 articles; 42 met eligibility criteria. Factors associated with better outcomes included a shorter preoperative interval, shorter graft length when an interposed graft was used, nerve continuity, and younger patient age. Gender or sex was not mentioned as a factor affecting outcomes in any study. Motor grades of ≥M3 on the British Medical Research Council (MRC) scale are typically considered successful outcomes. This was achieved in 81.4% of patients who underwent neurolysis, 78.8% of patients who underwent end-to-end suturing, 49.0% of patients who underwent nerve grafting, 62.9% of patients who underwent nerve transfer, 81.5% of patients who underwent isolated posterior tibial tendon transfer (PTTT), and 84.2% of patients who underwent a surgical procedure with concurrent PTTT. CONCLUSIONS: Studies included in this review were heterogenous, complicating our ability to perform further analysis. It is not possible to uniformly advocate for the best treatment option, given diverse injury modalities and patient presentations and a variety of prognostic factors. Many studies do not show outcomes with respect to injury modality. Future studies should show preoperative muscle strengths and should clearly define outcomes based on the injury modality and surgical treatment option. This would allow for greater analysis of the most appropriate treatment option for a given mechanism of injury. Newer surgical techniques are promising and should be further explored. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Comparison of the rate of delayed/nonunion in fifth metatarsal fractures receiving anti-inflammatory medications.

PURPOSE: Controversy exists regarding the acute effect of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) on early fracture healing. The purpose of this study was to analyze the rate of nonunion or delayed union in patients with fifth metatarsal (5th MT) fractures. We hypothesize that the use of NSAIDs would increase the rate of nonunion/delayed union in 5th MT fractures. METHODS: Using PearlDiver, a national insurance database was analyzed. ICD codes were used to identify patients diagnosed with 5th MT fracture from 2007-2018. Patients were grouped by initial management (nonoperative vs. open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) or non/malunion repair within 60 days) and sub-grouped by whether they had been prescribed at least one pre-defined NSAID. Subsequent ORIF or nonunion/malunion repair operative intervention was used as a surrogate for fracture nonunion/delayed union. RESULTS: Of the 10,991 subjects with a diagnosis of 5th MT, 10,626 (96.7%) underwent initial nonoperative treatment, 1,409 of which (13.3%) received prescription NSAIDS within 60 days of diagnosis. 16/1,409 (1.14%) subjects who received anti-inflammatory prescriptions underwent ORIF or repair of non/malunion at least 60 days after diagnosis while 46/9,217 (0.50%; P=0.003483) subjects who did not receive anti-inflammatory prescriptions underwent ORIF or repair of non/malunion at least 60 days after diagnosis. In the 365 subjects who underwent early repair/ORIF (within 60 days), there was no significant difference in the rate of nonunion/delayed union. CONCLUSION: The rate of nonunion/delayed union of 5th MT fractures was significantly higher in subjects receiving NSAIDs within 60 days of initial diagnosis in patients managed non-operatively. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: A PearlDiver study evaluating complications rates, opioid use and utilization in the Medicare population.

PURPOSE: Despite increased utilization of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) for unicompartmental knee osteoarthritis, outcomes in Medicare patients are not well-reported. The purpose of this study is to analyze practice patterns and outcome differences between UKA and TKA in the Medicare population. It is hypothesized that UKA utilization will have increased over the course of the study period and that UKA will be associated with reduced opioid use and lower complication rates compared to TKA. METHODS: Using PearlDiver, the Humana Claims dataset and the Medicare Standard Analytic File (SAF) were analyzed. Patients who underwent UKA and TKA were identified by CPT codes. Postoperative complications were identified by ICD-9/ICD-10 codes. Opioid use was analyzed by the number of days patients were prescribed opioids postoperatively. Survivorship was defined as conversion to TKA. RESULTS: In the Humana dataset, 7,808 UKA and 150,680 TKA patients were identified. 8-year survivorship was 87.7% (95% CI [0.861,0.894]). Postoperative opioid use was significantly higher after TKA (186.1 days) compared to UKA (144.7 days) (p < 0.01, Δ = 41.1, 95% CI = [30.41, 52.39]). In the SAF dataset, 20,592 UKA patients and 110,562 TKA patients were identified. Survivorship was highest in patients > 80 years old and lowest in patients < 70 years old. In both datasets, postoperative complication rates were higher in TKA patients compared to UKA patients in nearly all categories. CONCLUSIONS: UKA represents an increasingly utilized treatment for osteoarthritis in the Medicare population and may be comparatively advantageous to TKA due to reduced opioid use and complication rates after surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Defining Return to Sport: A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: Return to sport (RTS) commonly serves as a measure for assessment of clinical outcomes in orthopaedic sports medicine surgery. Unfortunately, while RTS is commonly utilized in research for this purpose, currently there is no widely accepted or standardized definition for when an athlete has officially returned to his or her sport. PURPOSE: To conduct a systematic review to evaluate and report the differences in specific definitions of RTS utilized in the orthopaedic surgery literature. STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4. METHODS: A systematic review was performed using PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Trials databases per PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. Search terms consisted of variations of "RTS" combined with variations of "orthopedic surgery" and "define" to capture as many relevant articles as possible. The definition of RTS was recorded and analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 718 articles were identified in the initial search, 29 of which met eligibility criteria, providing a clear definition of RTS. Of the 29 studies included, 20 (69.0%) defined RTS as an athlete competing in a game or other competitive play. Three (10.3%) defined this as the athlete competing in a game or other competitive play but with an explicitly stated competition-level modifier of the athlete returning to his or her preinjury level of competition. Two articles (6.9%) included returning to training or practice, and the remaining 4 articles (13.8%) used terminology other than the standard RTS. CONCLUSION: There is variability in the definition of RTS used in orthopaedic sports medicine literature. Most studies refer to the athlete competing in a game or other competitive play. Other variants include returning to practice/training and explicitly defined competition levels and objectives. Future studies should aim to standardize the definition of RTS to facilitate more precise assessment of outcome after sports medicine surgery. Using terminology that describes components of the recovery and rehabilitation process, such as "return to participation" and "return to performance," in addition to RTS will allow us to more clearly understand the athlete's recovery and associated level of competition or performance.