Comparison of the results of using a self-adhesive mesh and a polypropylene mesh in open inguinal hernia repair: a prospective randomized controlled study.

<b> Introduction:</b> Inguinal hernia repair is the most common operation worldwide. The essential factors in hernia repair have been the postoperative quality of life, early return to work, low recurrence rate, and chronic pain prevention. </br></br> <b>Aim:</b> The aim of this study was to compare the short- and long-term results of the self-adhesive mesh and the conventional polypropylene mesh in Lichtenstein repair. </br></br> <b> Material and methods:</b> A total of 100 male patients were randomized and operated on, 50 with the self-adhesive mesh (S group), 50 with the conventional polypropylene mesh (P group). Prospectively, the patients were followed for an average of 36 months. The two groups were compared for the duration of surgery, duration of hospital stay, duration of daily activity/resumption of work, postoperative pain, chronic pain, recurrence, wound infection, hematoma/seroma formation, and postoperative analgesic consumption. </br></br> <b>Results:</b> The study involved 39 patients in the P group and 37 patients in the S group who underwent inguinal hernia surgery. The P group had a longer mean operation time than the S group, and the difference between the two groups was statistically significant (45.1 ± 6.6 min vs. 28.8 ± 3.0 min, P = 0.0001). In recurrence, postoperative discomfort, chronic pain, length of hospital stay, daily activity/return to work, wound infection, hematoma/seroma, and postoperative analgesic use, there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups. </br></br> <b>Conclusion:</b> It was found that the self-adhesive mesh did not produce statistically significant advantages over the conventional polypropylene mesh, except for operative time, in the Lichtenstein repair.

Routine Histopathological Examination of the Specimen After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: Can We Be Brave Enough to Give Up?

BACKGROUND: Selective versus routine histopathological examination after cholecystectomy is still in debate. This study aims to investigate the effect of histopathology results on treatment modality and surgery strategy. The validity of the selective histopathology approach was questioned. METHODS: The data of patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy between January 2009 and December 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. The demographics and histopathology results, whether the operation was emergent or elective, and the reasons for conversion to open surgery were recorded. Malignant and precursor histopathology diagnoses were examined, and their relationship with the surgical strategy was questioned. RESULTS: A total of 2723 patients were included in the study. Of these patients, 2600 (95.5%) were operated under elective, while 123 (4.5%) were operated under emergency conditions. While the surgery was completed laparoscopically in 2685 (98.6%) patients, it was converted to open surgery in 38 (1.4%) patients. Age, gender, the presence of primary gallbladder cancer, acute cholecystitis, and xanthogranulomatous cholecystitis in histopathological examination were found to be independent predictive factors for conversion to open surgery (P < .05). The rate of primary invasive carcinoma in the series was 0.1%. CONCLUSION: Routine histopathological examination of the gallbladder is important for demonstrating a wide spectrum of pathological changes in this organ. Invasive cancer or precursor lesions can be detected even in patients without any macroscopic abnormality. Histopathological examination also plays a role in determining follow-up, further examination, and treatment modality in addition to the diagnosis in these patients.

Acute Appendicitis in Pregnancy: How to Manage?

OBJECTIVES: Acute appendicitis during pregnancy may be associated with severe maternal and fetal complications. The clinical, laboratory and radiological parameters used in diagnosis and the effects of the surgical method and timing on the results are controversial. The present study aims to reveal the relationship between clinical approach, surgical treatment methods and complications in pregnant women with suspected acute appendicitis. METHODS: Between December 2007 and August 2019, 21 pregnant women who underwent appendectomy were included in this study. Age, gestational age, complaints at admission, leukocyte count, radiological examination results, type of surgery (conventional or laparoscopic), histopathology results, time from admission to operation, maternal and fetal complications were retrospectively evaluated. RESULTS: The number of patients who developed complications was six (28.6%). Three (14.3%) of these patients had preterm birth and three (14.3%) had an abortion. There was no statistically significant relationship between trimester and complication (p=0.747). Fourteen patients (66.7%) underwent laparoscopic surgery and seven patients (33.3%) underwent conventional surgery. Although the complication rate was higher in the laparoscopic group, there was no statistically significant difference (p=0.306). The fetal loss rate in the series was 14.3% and all were in the laparoscopic group. However, there was no statistically significant difference between the groups (p=0.158). CONCLUSION: Pregnancy-related limiting factors may complicate the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. These patients definitely need a more skeptical assessment and additional diagnostic tools beyond the standard clinical approach. Although laparoscopic appendectomy appears to be a safe option in treatment, its relationship with a higher risk of fetal loss should be kept in mind.

Microscopic hematuria as a marker of blunt abdominal trauma in rats: description of an experimental model.

BACKGROUND: Microscopic hematuria is an extremely important sign in blunt abdominal trauma (BAT) patients. Controversies still exist in the literature on whether microscopic hematuria is a sign of intra-abdominal extrarenal organ injury and is an indication for radiographic assessment of BAT patients. In this study, a new BAT rat model was developed, and we tried to determine the relationships between microscopic hematuria and extrarenal intra-abdominal organ injury. METHODS: After verifying our model, lethal and maximal sublethal intensity of impact energy determined in the rats. Animals allocated into six sublethal impact energy groups. BAT was induced by dropping a standard mass from variable heights. After 2 hours of examining period, macroscopic laparotomy findings, histopathological liver, spleen and renal injury grades, and microscopic hematuria levels were recorded in these six groups. RESULTS: According to our results, while the trauma intensity increase severity of the histopathological injury increases for all organs. Although there was a significant correlation between microscopic hematuria and trauma intensity, we could not show same relationship between microscopic hematuria and histopathological organ injury. On the other hand, microscopic hematuria was correlated with the macroscopic laparotomy findings. CONCLUSIONS: Microscopic hematuria could serve as a predictor of the severity of trauma and intra-abdominal organ injury. This study would support the use of abdominal imaging and attentive assessment for intra-abdominal organ injury in stable BAT patients with hematuria. The laparotomy threshold may be lowered for unstable BAT patients with hematuria.