Congenital anomalies of kidney and urinary tract (CAKUT) and associated extra-renal anomalies in fetal autopsies.

OBJECTIVES AND BACKGROUND: According to studies, 1% of all pregnancies have an abnormality, with 20-30% of those affecting the genitourinary system. Congenital abnormalities of the kidney and urinary tract (CAKUT) is one of the primary causes of perinatal and neonatal mortality in children. Many extra-renal congenital illnesses accompany these defects, affecting the patient's prognosis. This study aims to determine the subtypes, frequency, and extra-renal defects associated with congenital anomalies of the urinary system, which is the major cause of mortality in fetal and infant autopsies throughout the perinatal and neonatal eras. We believe that our study will contribute to the literature because few autopsy investigations can give this data. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study included 110 fetal autopsies between January 1997 and May 2019. 10% were newborns under the age of one year, and 90% were fetus autopsies. RESULTS: Males accounted for 67.3% of the cases, while females accounted for 35 (31.8%) (the gender of one case could not be determined). Renal dysplasia was the most frequent CAKUT, with a rate of 22.73%, followed by renal agenesis, with a rate of 20.0%. Eighty-four cases (76.3%) showed disease in at least one other organ system. Musculoskeletal system (MSS) abnormalities were the most common associated system anomaly, with one or more MSS anomalies (34.55%) detected in 38 cases. CONCLUSION: Finally, we want to underline that CAKUT and its associated anomalies are not uncommon. Prenatal imaging, genetic investigation, and/or postmortem examination should all be used to screen for CAKUT. This information is helpful for the mother's future pregnancy management and parental genetic counseling.

Perioperative Comparison of Preemptive and Non-Preemptive Renal Transplant Recipients.

OBJECTIVE: Preemptive transplantation cannot be performed for all patients because of the limited number of donors. This study aimed to evaluate the perioperative effects of dialysis before renal transplantation. METHODS: In this study, we retrospectively investigated 666 patients who underwent kidney transplantation at our centre. We divided patients into two groups: patients with pre-transplant dialysis (67.3%, n=448) and patients with preemptive transplant (32.7%, n=218). We carried out preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative comparisons between groups. RESULTS: No difference was observed in terms of intraoperative blood transfusion, crystalloid and colloid requirement, inotropic-vasopressor agent administration and hemodynamic parameters between the patients with pre-transplant dialysis and preemptive transplant. It was observed that dialysis requirement, delayed graft function and acute rejection development were significantly higher during the postoperative period in patients who underwent dialysis before transplantation. In patients with non-preemptive transplant, the decrease of serum creatinine levels at the first postoperative month was more prominent when compared to patients with preemptive transplant; however, that difference disappeared in the first year follow-up. No significant difference was found for serum albumin levels and proteinuria alterations of the patients in long-term follow-up. Additionally, patient and graft survival comparisons between patients with non-preemptive and preemptive transplant on three-year follow-up revealed no significant difference. CONCLUSION: We think that preemptive transplantation treatment is a better option for patients with end-stage renal failure since patients with preemptive transplantation appear to have less metabolic function impairment, complication risk and more successful outcomes in terms of cost-effectiveness.

We can Diagnose it if we Consider it. Diagnostic Pitfall for Placenta: Placental Mesenchymal Dysplasia.

Placental mesenchymal dysplasia is an increasingly recognizable abnormality. Early cases have been confused with partial hydatidiform mole. Placental mesenchymal dysplasia is probably under-diagnosed because of being an unfamiliar clinical entity and also mistaken for gestational trophoblastic disease due to the similar sonographic findings of two entities. In this report, we describe the clinical, gross, and histopathological findings of placental mesenchymal dysplasia in two cases. The 33-week-preterm baby of a 26-year-old woman with cardiovascular disease and 342 gram placenta and the 19-week fetus with trisomy 21 of a 40 year-old woman were terminated. Macroscopically thick-walled vessels and microscopically hydropic villous with peripherally localized thick-walled vessels without trophoblastic cell proliferation were observed in both cases. These two cases represent a rare placental anomaly that is benign but it is challenging to distinguish placental mesenchymal dysplasia from an incomplete mole. Placental mesenchymal dysplasia should be included in the differential diagnosis of sonographic findings that show a normal appearing fetus and a placenta with cystic lesions. Placental mesenchymal dysplasia is associated with pregnancy-related hypertension. In conclusion, the most important point is "you can diagnose it if you consider it".