Toward Building a Provincial Diabetes Registry of Children and Youth Living With Diabetes in British Columbia, Canada.

OBJECTIVES: Pediatric diabetes health-care providers and decision-makers in British Columbia (BC) have prioritized the creation of a provincial pediatric diabetes clinical registry to improve care quality. Our objective is to build the first BC Pediatrics Diabetes Registry (BC-PDR) for quality improvement and coordination of pediatric diabetes care across the province. METHODS: Patients <19 years of age and diagnosed with diabetes were invited to participate in our study. Recruitment began in 2017 at the BC Children's Hospital (BCCH) and expanded to 6 community-based pediatric diabetes clinics in the Interior Health Authority (HA) in 2019. In response to COVID-19, recruitment shifted from in-person to virtual using an electronic consent system. Patient-level (e.g. age at diabetes onset, ethnicity) and visit-level (e.g. glycated hemoglobin [A1C], blood pressure, diabetes regimen, technology use, medications) data were collected in addition to screening for and presence of diabetes complications. RESULTS: As of January 2021, 635 patients from the BCCH and Interior HA were included in the BC-PDR. From the BCCH, 94% of 590 patients were diagnosed with type 1 diabetes and the median A1C was 7.8% and increased with age. Just under half of the BCCH patients were using insulin pump technology and/or a continuous glucose monitoring system. CONCLUSIONS: Over the last 3 years, we have worked to adapt and operationalize the BC-PDR. The next steps for the BC-PDR include engaging diabetes stakeholders in the development of an electronic benchmarking dashboard along with linkage of the data to patient-reported outcome and experience measures and provincial administrative databases.

Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy for Patients With Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Importance: Sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSNHL) is an acute, usually unilateral deficit. Systemic and intratympanic steroids are accepted treatments. Although evidence suggests that hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) may be beneficial, it is not widely offered. Objectives: To review and evaluate recent evidence of the association of HBOT with hearing outcomes in SSNHL and to determine if HBOT should be a single or part of a combination treatment regimen. Data Sources: Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, Web of Science, CAB, ICTRP, Google Scholar, Clinicaltrials.gov, and ISRCTN databases were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published in English from January 1, 2000, and April 30, 2020. Study Selection: Prospective RCTs involving only adult participants (≥18 years) with SSNHL and comparing HBOT, as a single or combination therapy, with control therapies, such as steroids and/or placebo. Only RCTs that used the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery's diagnostic criteria for SSNHL were included. Data Extraction and Synthesis: Data were extracted independently by 2 researchers. A fixed-effects model was used for analysis and performed from November 30, 2020, to May 20, 2021. Main Outcomes and Measures: The mean difference in absolute hearing gain recorded by pure-tone audiometric (PTA) thresholds averaged across 4 low (0.5, 1, 2, and 3 or 4 kHz) or 3 high (3 or 4, 6, and 8 kHz) frequencies was the primary outcome. The secondary outcomes were the odds ratio of hearing recovery defined as a hearing gain of ≥10 decibels (dB) in PTA average and treatment-related adverse effects. Results: Of the 826 records initially identified, 358 duplicates and 451 articles were excluded based on article type, title, and abstract. The full texts of 17 articles were reviewed, of which 14 were excluded because they were either not prospective RCTs (11 articles), the participants were less than 18 years old (2 articles), or the PTA was not reported at frequencies of interest (1 article). Three prospective RCTs with a total of 88 participants who received HBOT in the intervention groups and 62 participants who received only medical therapy in the control groups were studied. The intergroup difference in mean absolute hearing gain (mean difference, 10.3 dB; 95% CI, 6.5-14.1 dB; I2 = 0%) and the odds ratio of hearing recovery (4.3; 95% CI, 1.6-11.7; I2 = 0%) favored HBOT over the control therapy. Conclusions and Relevance: In this systematic review and meta-analysis, HBOT as part of a combination treatment was significantly associated with improved hearing outcomes in patients with SSNHL over control treatments. Trial Registration: PROSPERO Identifier: CRD42020193191.

Evaluation of telephone and virtual visits for routine pediatric diabetes care during the COVID-19 pandemic.

AIMS: To evaluate pediatric type 1 diabetes telehealth visits during the COVID-19 pandemic, with a focus on assessing the usability of these visits and gathering patient perspectives. METHODS: An online survey, which included a validated telehealth usability questionnaire, was offered via email to families with a telephone or virtual visit since the COVID-19-related cancellation of routine in-person care. Survey data was linked with the British Columbia (BC) Clinical Diabetes Registry. Outcomes between groups were assessed using Welch's t-test. Associations with type of visit as well as with desire to return to in-person care were assessed with logistic regression models. RESULTS: The response rate was 47%. Of 141 survey respondents, 87 had clinical data available in the BC Clinical Diabetes Registry, and thus were included in our analysis. Overall, telephone and virtual visits were rated highly for usability. Telephone visits were easier to learn to use, and simpler to understand; however, telephone and virtual visits were similar across multiple areas. No factors associated with choosing one type of visit over the other, or with desire to return to in-person care, could be identified. 72% of participants want future telehealth care; however, some would like all future care to be in-person. CONCLUSIONS: Telephone and virtual visits had impressive usability. Many families want telehealth to play a significant part in their future care.

A systematic review and meta-analysis of extratympanic electrocochleography in Ménière's disease diagnosis.

Objective: Determine whether a combination of electrocochleography determined summating/action potential (SP/AP) ratio and other audiological measurements has greater sensitivity and specificity than that achieved with electrocochleography SP/AP ratio alone in diagnosing definite Ménière's Disease. Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Study sample: Pubmed, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were searched using search terms "electrocochleography", "ECochG, ,"ECoG", "Ménière's Disease", and "Idiopathic Endolymphatic Hydrops". Inclusion criteria were extratympanic electrocochleography methodology, English language publication between January 2002 and December 2017, and the 1995 American Academy of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery Ménière's disease diagnostic criteria. Five articles satisfied inclusion criteria and were sufficiently detailed for aggregate quantitative analysis of SP/AP ratio (315 subjects) and combination audiological measures (113 subjects). Results: The diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of the SP/AP amplitude ratio was 47.6% and 83.8% and of combination diagnostic measures 63.5% and 89.3%, respectively. Point estimates of sensitivity (p = 0.248) and specificity (p = 0.969) and the summary Receiver Operator Characteristic Curve (p = 0.407) were not statistically significant. Conclusion: Statistically, combination diagnostic measures do not result in greater accuracy of definite Ménière's disease diagnosis compared to the SP/AP amplitude ratio alone. However, given the small sample size further studies are recommended to arrive at a definitive conclusion.