Outcomes of Surgical Management of Turf Toe: 12-Year Results.

Background "Turf toe" is a classical capsuloligamentous injury to the plantar surface of the metatarsophalangeal (MTP) joint of the great toe. The name is synonymous with injuries sustained on artificial turf or hard grounds. The classical injury pattern is a hyperdorsiflexion injury with an axial load. The outcomes of these injuries are unpredictable and there are no clear guidelines for the management of these injuries. These injuries are debilitating and can lead to long-term problems and inability to return to pre-injury activity level if missed. We present a long-term surgical follow-up of severe grade 3 turf toe injuries. Methods In the period from 2011 to 2022, we treated 20 patients with turf toe/MTP joint instability. There were 10 football injuries (50%), six running injuries (30%), two gymnastic injuries (10%), one motorcycle injury (0.5%), and one was a ballet dancer (0.5%). All the grade 1 and 2 injuries were treated conservatively with rest, ice application, and splinting of the toe. Grade 3 injuries were treated surgically and strict rehabilitation protocol was followed. Results The mean age at surgery was 32.7 years and the average patient follow-up was 7.5 months after surgery. The Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOXFQ) score showed a statistically significant improvement from a mean of 73.0 (median = 75) preoperatively to 28.1 (median = 28.6) postoperatively (median improvement = 46.4, P = 0.022). Similarly, there was a significant improvement in pain score, which showed an improvement from a mean of 72.9 (median = 70.0) preoperatively to a mean of 22.9 (median = 25.0) postoperatively (median improvement = 51.3, P = 0.022). Conclusion Turf toe is a serious injury that may prevent a high percentage of patients from resuming their previous physical activities. The correct identification, classification, and grading of the first MTP joint instability helps in decision-making and achieving good surgical outcomes.

First Metatarsophalangeal Joint Replacement in a Patient With Monostotic Fibrous Dysplasia and Associated Metatarsophalangeal Arthritis.

Fibrous dysplasia (FD) is a benign disorder characterized by the replacement of normal bone tissue with fibrous connective tissue, making the bone more susceptible to fractures and increasing the risk of developing degenerative arthritis in multiple joints. We present an unusual case of monostotic FD affecting the first metatarsal, accompanied by metatarsophalangeal (MTP) arthritis, which caused difficulties in walking, pain, and reduced quality of life. The patient underwent the first MTP joint replacement using the mobile bearing ROTOglide™ first MTP joint replacement system; the use of this specific implant for this indication appears to be a novel aspect in the existing literature. Following the operation, the patient returned to normal activities, experiencing improvements in pain, walking, and quality of life, thus demonstrating excellent outcomes.

Is Internal brace augmentation a gold standard treatment compared to isolated Modified Brostrom Gould repair for chronic lateral ligament ankle instability? Effect on functional outcome and Return to preinjury activity: A retrospective analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Modified Brostrom Gould (MBG) repair is widely accepted procedure for chronic lateral ankle instability (CLAI), but there are limitations with regards to strength of repair and risk of reinjury and complications. Internal brace has been recently used as augmentation of standard MBG repair. It provides stronger construct, facilitates early mobilisation and protects repaired ligament with minimal surgical morbidity. The aim of present study is to compare the outcome of MBG repair without and with Internal brace augmentation (IB) in CLAI. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of 172 patients with CLAI who underwent MBG repair with or without IBA between November 2017 and October 2019. Patients were evaluated for Visual analogue scale (VAS), Manchester-oxford foot questionnaire (MOxFQ), Patients subjective satisfaction and return to preinjury activity level. RESULTS: 148 patients were included in the study with 87 in MBG group and 61 in IB group. The mean age, average injury-surgery interval and mean follow up duration was 40.6 ± 11.2 vs 37.5 ± 14.7 years, 13.1 ± 10.3 vs 14.1 ± 8 months and mean follow up duration of 24.2 ± 5.1 vs 20.7 ± 6.0 months respectively (p > 0.05). The mean time to return to preinjury activity level was significantly better in IB group compared to MBG group of 12.1 ± 2.3 vs 20.3 ± 3.9 weeks, p < 0.001. 55 (90.2%) patients in IB and 73 (83.7%) in MBG group return to preinjury activity level. Mean postoperative VAS score (1.9 ± 1.5 vs. 1.7 ± 1.4, p = 0.428), Mean MOxFQ score (19.7 ± 22.2 vs. 18.2 ± 15.4, p = 0.674) showed no significant difference between MBG and IB group respectively, at final follow up. CONCLUSION: The use of IB augmentation with MBG repair showed significantly better outcome in terms of early rehabilitation and return to preinjury activity level compared to isolated MBG repair. The functional outcome and VAS score were better in IB group compared to MBG group with no significant difference. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV retrospective study.

Early to medium term outcomes of osteochondral lesions of the talus treated by autologous matrix induced chondrogenesis (AMIC).

BACKGROUND: The primary aim of the study is to evaluate the functional outcome following AMIC procedure in patients with osteochondral injury of the talus. The secondary aim is to evaluate if size of the lesion and patient's age influence outcome. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective study of 25 patients who underwent AMIC procedure of the talus treated by a single surgeon. Functional outcomes were evaluated using pre and post operative AOFAS and VAS scores. RESULTS: The mean lesion size was 1.74 cms with 88% of lesions in the study more than 1.4 cms. There was a significant improvement in AOFAS score with mean improvement of 49.40 (p < 0.05) and VAS score of 5.36 (p < 0.05). We could not find any correlation between either age or lesion size with functional outcome for AMIC procedure. CONCLUSION: AMIC procedure seems to be a reliable treatment method for larger diameter osteochondral lesions of the talus up to 2.5 cms in diameter.

Early Outcome of a Single Peri-Tendinous Hyaluronic Acid Injection for Mid-Portion Non-Insertional Achilles Tendinopathy - A Pilot Study.

AIM: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a single, peri-tendinous injection of hyaluronic acid for mid-portion, non-insertional Achilles tendinopathy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective, open labelled, single center, pilot study was conducted. All patients enrolled received a single peri-tendinous injection of Ostenil Tendon™ (40 mg/2 ml 2% HA with 0.5% mannitol). Outcome measures were Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) pain score and Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOxFQ) scores at 2 weeks and at final follow at 12 weeks. Any major and minor adverse effects were recorded. To assess change in VAS and MOxFQ scores, t test and Wilcoxon signed rank test were employed. RESULTS: Seventeen patients were enrolled in this study with a mean follow-up of 12 weeks. Mean pre-injection VAS score was 9.38 cm (9-9.8), which significantly reduced post-injection to a mean score of 4.09 cm (2-8) at week-2 stage, and further improved to 3.01 cm (2-3.9) at the final follow-up (p < 0.0001). MOxFQ score showed a significant improvement from pre-injection value of 67.77 (63.03-72.55) to 31.18 (13-60) at week-2 stage, and further improved to 24.20 (15.73-32.67) at the final follow-up (p < 0.0001). The mean improvement from pre-injection to the final follow up was 43.57 (34.25-52.90). No adverse effects for injections were recorded. CONCLUSION: This small series suggests an encouraging response of a single injection of HA as an effective and safe option for non-insertional Achilles tendinopathy.

Functional and radiological medium term outcome following supramalleolar osteotomy for asymmetric ankle arthritis- A case series of 33 patients.

INTRODUCTION: Ankle arthritis is one of the most disabling and painful conditions. Up to 37.5% of ankle arthritis presents as asymmetric arthritis with ankle malalignment. Supramalleolar osteotomy is a joint sparing operation, which aims to realign the ankle joint that will prevent progression of arthritis and relieve patient's symptoms. AIM: The aim of this study is to analyse the medium term functional and radiographic outcomes of patients who underwent supramalleolar osteotomy for asymmetric ankle arthritis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective outcome study of medium term outcome for 33 patients who underwent Supramalleolar osteotomy for asymmetric ankle arthritis by a single surgeon. We assessed the functional outcome of the patients with AOFAS and VAS score. The radiological parameters measured were Tibial articular surface ankle (TAS), Hind foot alignment angle (HFA) and Talar tilt angle (TT). We used the paired Student's t-test to compare the preoperative and postoperative radiographic measurements, AOFAS and VAS scores. We set the significance level at P < 0.05. RESULTS: We had 21 patients who underwent lateral closing wedge osteotomy for varus deformity and 12 patients who underwent medial closing wedge osteotomy for valgus deformity. The mean followup was 72 months [29-73]. The mean AOFAS score significantly improved by 44.82 ± 7.97 (p < 0.0001). The VAS score significantly improved by 5.06 ± 1.41 (p < 0.0001). All the radiological parameters showed statistically significant improvement. All osteotomy united by 8-10 weeks. We had one case of late deep wound infection, which settled down with by metalwork removal. The arthritis progressed in three cases, two patients had fusion and one patient had ankle replacement. We had 90.9% survival rate for our osteotomy at 6 years. CONCLUSION: Supramalleolar osteotomy is an excellent option for patients with asymmetric ankle arthritis with good functional and radiological outcome and good medium term survival rate.

Interobserver and intraobserver variations in radial head fracture classification-assessment of two classification systems.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the intra- and interobserver variation of two classification systems for radial head fractures (Mason and Charalambous classifications) using plain radiographs. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Five observers classified 30 radial head fractures as per the two classifications using anteroposterior and lateral elbow radiographs. Assessments were done on two occasions, at least 6 weeks apart. RESULTS: The interobserver and intraobserver variation of the Mason classification showed fair (mean kappa = 0.33) and moderate agreement (mean kappa = 0.43) respectively. The interobserver and intraobserver variation of the Charalambous classification showed moderate agreement for both (mean kappa = 0.42 and 0.49 respectively). A greater proportion of radial head fractures could be classified using the Charalambous classification compared with the Mason classification (P < 0.001). With the Charalambous classification, the inter-observer variation was better when assessing fracture morphology (4 morphology groups) versus fracture displacement (2 displaced/un-displaced groups) (p = 0.010). CONCLUSIONS: The Mason and Charalambous classifications for radial head fractures confer similar reliability when using plain radiographs, but the latter allows a greater proportion of fractures to be classified. Raters may agree more on fracture morphology as compared to fracture displacement. Our findings also demonstrate the limitations of using plain radiographs in classifying radial head fractures for clinical or research purposes, and suggest that evaluation with more sensitive modalities such as Computed Tomography may be preferable.

Quality of life after amputation in patients with advanced complex regional pain syndrome: a systematic review.

The majority of included studies (8 out of 11, n = 54) supported the concept of considering amputation for selected, unresponsive cases of complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) as a justifiable alternative to an unsuccessful multimodality nonoperative option.Of patients who underwent amputation, 66% experienced improvement in quality of life (QOL) and 37% were able to use a prosthesis, 16% had an obvious decline in QOL and for 12% of patients, no clear details were given, although it was suggested by authors that these patients also encountered deterioration after amputation.Complications of phantom limb pain, recurrence of CRPS and stump pain were predominant risks and were noticed in 65%, 45% and 30% of cases after amputation, respectively and two-thirds of patients were satisfied.Amputation can be considered by clinicians and patients as an option to improve QOL and to relieve agonizing, excruciating pain of severe, resistant CRPS at a specialized centre after multidisclipinary involvement but it must be acknowledged that evidence is limited, and the there are risks of aggravating or recurrence of CRPS, phantom pain and unpredictable consequences of rehabilitation.Amputation, if considered for resistant CRPS, should be carried out at specialist centres and after MDT involvement before and after surgery. It should only be considered if requested by patients with poor quality of life who have failed to improve after multiple treatment modalities.Further high quality and comprehensive research is needed to understand the severe form of CRPS which behaves differently form less severe stages. Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2019;4:533-540. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.4.190008.