Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 10 de 10
Filter
1.
Psychoneuroendocrinology ; 167: 107106, 2024 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38943720

ABSTRACT

Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor (BDNF) is implicated in extinction learning, which is a primary mechanism of exposure therapy for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Brief aerobic exercise has been shown to promote BDNF release and augment extinction learning. On the premise that the Val allele of the BDNF Val66Met polymorphism facilitates greater release of BDNF, this study examined the extent to which the Val allele of the BDNF polymorphism predicted treatment response in PTSD patients who underwent exposure therapy combined with aerobic exercise or passive stretching. PTSD patients (N = 85) provided saliva samples in order to extract genomic DNA to identify Val/Val and Met carriers of the BDNF Val66Met genotype, and were assessed for PTSD severity prior to and following a 9-week course of exposure therapy combined with aerobic exercise or stretching. The sample comprised 52 Val/Val carriers and 33 Met carriers. Patients with the BDNF high-expression Val allele display greater reduction of PTSD symptoms at posttreatment than Met carriers. Hierarchical regression analysis indicated that greater PTSD reduction was specifically observed in Val/Val carriers who received exposure therapy in combination with the aerobic exercise. This finding accords with animal and human evidence that the BDNF Val allele promotes greater extinction learning, and that these individuals may benefit more from exercise-augmented extinction. Although preliminary, this result represents a possible avenue for augmented exposure therapy in patients with the BDNF Val allele.


Subject(s)
Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor , Exercise , Implosive Therapy , Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic , Humans , Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor/genetics , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/genetics , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/therapy , Male , Female , Adult , Pilot Projects , Implosive Therapy/methods , Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide/genetics , Middle Aged , Exercise/physiology , Treatment Outcome , Genotype , Exercise Therapy/methods , Alleles , Combined Modality Therapy , Methionine/genetics
2.
JAMA Psychiatry ; 81(7): 646-654, 2024 Jul 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38656428

ABSTRACT

Importance: Although grief-focused cognitive behavior therapies are the most empirically supported treatment for prolonged grief disorder, many people find this treatment difficult. A viable alternative for treatment is mindfulness-based cognitive therapy. Objective: To examine the relative efficacies of grief-focused cognitive behavior therapy and mindfulness-based cognitive therapy to reduce prolonged grief disorder severity. Design, Setting, and Participants: A single-blind, parallel, randomized clinical trial was conducted among adults aged 18 to 70 years with prolonged grief disorder, as defined in the International Classification of Diseases, 11th Revision, and assessed by clinical interview based on the Prolonged Grief-13 (PG-13) scale. Those with severe suicidal risk, presence of psychosis, or substance dependence were excluded. Between November 2012 and November 2022, eligible participants were randomized 1:1 to eleven 90-minute sessions of grief-focused cognitive behavior therapy or mindfulness-based cognitive therapy at a traumatic stress clinic in Sydney, Australia, with follow-up through 6 months. Interventions: Both groups received once-weekly 90-minute individual sessions for 11 weeks. Grief-focused cognitive behavior therapy comprised 5 sessions of recalling memories of the deceased, plus cognitive restructuring and planning future social and positive activities. Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy comprised mindfulness exercises adapted to tolerate grief-related distress. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was change in prolonged grief disorder severity measured by the PG-13 scale assessed at baseline, 1 week posttreatment, and 6 months after treatment (primary outcome time point), as well as secondary outcome measures of depression, anxiety, grief-related cognition, and quality of life. Results: The trial included 100 participants (mean [SD] age, 47.3 [13.4] years; 87 [87.0%] female), 50 in the grief-focused cognitive behavior therapy condition and 50 in the mindfulness-based cognitive therapy condition. Linear mixed models indicated that at the 6-month assessment, participants in the grief-focused cognitive behavior therapy group showed greater reduction in PG-13 scale score relative to those in the mindfulness-based cognitive therapy group (mean difference, 7.1; 95% CI, 1.6-12.5; P = .01), with a large between-group effect size (0.8; 95% CI, 0.2-1.3). Participants in the grief-focused cognitive behavior therapy group also demonstrated greater reductions in depression as measured on the Beck Depression Inventory than those in the mindfulness-based cognitive therapy group (mean difference, 6.6; 95% CI, 0.5-12.9; P = .04) and grief-related cognition (mean difference, 14.4; 95% CI, 2.8-25.9; P = .02). There were no other significant differences between treatment groups and no reported adverse events. Conclusions and Relevance: In this study, grief-focused cognitive behavior therapy conferred more benefit for core prolonged grief disorder symptoms and associated problems 6 months after treatment than mindfulness-based cognitive therapy. Although both treatments may be considered for prolonged grief disorder, grief-focused cognitive behavior therapy might be the more effective choice, taking all factors into consideration. Trial Registration: anzctr.org.au Identifier: ACTRN12612000307808.


Subject(s)
Cognitive Behavioral Therapy , Grief , Mindfulness , Humans , Mindfulness/methods , Female , Adult , Middle Aged , Cognitive Behavioral Therapy/methods , Male , Single-Blind Method , Aged , Young Adult , Treatment Outcome
3.
BMJ Ment Health ; 26(1)2023 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37385663

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The social restrictions occurring during the pandemic contributed to loss of many sources of reward, which contributes to poor mental health. OBJECTIVE: This trial evaluated a brief positive affect training programme to reduce anxiety, depression and suicidality during the pandemic. METHODS: In this single-blind, parallel, randomised controlled trial, adults who screened positive for COVID-19-related psychological distress across Australia were randomly allocated to either a 6-session group-based programme based on positive affect training (n=87) or enhanced usual care (EUC, n=87). Primary outcome was total score on the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale-anxiety and depression subscales assessed at baseline, 1-week post-treatment, 3 months (primary outcome time point) as well as secondary outcome measures of suicidality, generalised anxiety disorder, sleep impairment, positive and negative mood and COVID-19-related stress. FINDINGS: Between 20 September 2020 and 16 September 2021, 174 participants were enrolled into the trial. Relative to EUC, at 3-month follow-up the intervention led to greater reduction on depression (mean difference 1.2 (95% CI 0.4 to 1.9)), p=0.003), with a moderate effect size (0.5 (95% CI 0.2 to 0.9)). There were also greater reduction of suicidality and improvement in quality of life. There were no differences in anxiety, generalised anxiety, anhedonia, sleep impairment, positive or negative mood or COVID-19 concerns. CONCLUSIONS: This intervention was able to reduce depression and suicidality during adverse experiences when rewarding events were diminished, such as pandemics. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Strategies to improve positive affect may be useful to reduce mental health issues. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ACTRN12620000811909.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Adult , Humans , COVID-19/epidemiology , Mental Health , Pandemics/prevention & control , Quality of Life , Single-Blind Method
4.
Eur J Psychotraumatol ; 14(2): 2193525, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37042354

ABSTRACT

Background: Reliving distressing memories is a core component of treatments for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and prolonged grief disorder (PGD). There is little understanding of how reliving these memories functions in the treatment of these disorders.Objective: This study investigated whether reliving functions comparably in the treatment of PTSD and PGD, and whether it is comparably related to treatment outcome.Method: This study conducted a reanalysis of patients with either PTSD (n = 55) or PGD (n = 45) who underwent treatments that comprised at least four sessions of reliving memories of either their traumatic experience or the loss of the deceased person.Results: PTSD participants displayed greater habituation of distress across sessions during reliving than PGD participants. Between-session reduction in distress during reliving was associated with symptom remission in PTSD, but this pattern was not observed in PGD.Conclusion: This pattern of findings indicates that although reliving appears to be a useful strategy for treating both PTSD and PGD, this strategy does not function comparably in the two conditions and may involve distinct mechanisms.


Reliving distressing memories is key to treatment of PTSD and prolonged grief disorder.Distress during memory reliving habituated in PTSD treatment more than in treatment of grief.Habituation of distress during treatment predicted remission of symptoms in PTSD but not grief.


Subject(s)
Grief , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic , Humans , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/therapy , Prolonged Grief Disorder , Habituation, Psychophysiologic , Treatment Outcome
5.
Lancet Psychiatry ; 10(1): 21-29, 2023 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36436532

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Although exposure therapy is central in most front-line psychotherapies of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), many patients do not respond to this treatment. We aimed to investigate the effects of brief aerobic exercise on the efficacy of exposure therapy in reducing the severity of PTSD. METHODS: We did a single-blind, parallel, randomised controlled trial in Sydney, NSW, Australia. We included adults (aged ≥18 years) with clinician-diagnosed PTSD. We excluded participants aged 70 years or older, with imminent suicidal risk (reporting suicidal plan), presence of psychosis or substance dependence, history of moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury, or presence of a physical disorder or impairment that might be exacerbated by aerobic exercise (eg, back pain). We randomly assigned participants (1:1) to nine 90-min weekly sessions of exposure therapy for PTSD with 10 min aerobic exercise or to the control group of exposure therapy with 10 min passive stretching. The primary outcome was PTSD severity measured by the clinician-administered PTSD scale 2 (CAPS-2), independently assessed at baseline, 1 week after treatment, and 6 months after treatment (primary outcome timepoint). FINDINGS: Between Dec 12, 2012, and July 25, 2018, we enrolled 130 participants with PTSD, with 65 (50%) participants randomly assigned to exposure therapy with exercise and 65 (50%) to exposure therapy with passive stretching, including 79 (61%) women and 51 (39%) men, with a mean age of 39·1 years (SD 14·4; range 18-69). 99 (76%) participants were White, 14 (11%) were Asian, and 17 (13%) were listed as other. At the 6-month follow-up assessment, participants in the exposure therapy with exercise group showed greater reductions in CAPS-2 scores relative to those in the exposure therapy with stretching group (mean difference 12·1 [95% CI 2·4-21·8]; p=0·023), which resulted in a moderate effect size of 0·6 (0·1-1·1). No adverse events associated with the intervention were reported. The trial was prospectively registered on the Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, ACTRN12612000185864. INTERPRETATION: Brief aerobic exercise has the potential to augment long-term gains of exposure therapy for PTSD, which accords with evidence from studies in animals and humans on the role of exercise in modulating the extinction learning processes. This strategy might offer a simple and affordable means to augment treatment gains for exposure therapy in people with PTSD. FUNDING: Australian National Health and Medical Research Council.


Subject(s)
Implosive Therapy , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic , Adult , Male , Humans , Female , Adolescent , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/drug therapy , Single-Blind Method , Australia , Psychotherapy/methods , Exercise , Treatment Outcome
6.
BMC Psychiatry ; 22(1): 808, 2022 12 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36539730

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The mental health impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic have been profound. This paper outlines the study protocol for a trial that tests the efficacy of a brief group-based psychological intervention (Coping with COVID; CWC), relative to Supportive Counselling, to reduce distress associated with COVID-19 in a young adult population in Bangalore, India. METHODS: A single-blind, parallel, randomized controlled trial will be carried out via video conferencing in a small group format. Following informed consent, adults that screen positive for levels of psychological distress (Kessler 10 (K-10 score ≥ 20) and have access to a videoconferencing platform will be randomised to an adapted version of CWC (n = 90) or Supportive Counselling (SC) (n = 90). The primary outcome will be reduction in psychological distress including anxiety and depression at 2-months post treatment. Secondary outcomes include worry, positive wellbeing, and stress in relation to COVID-19. DISCUSSION: This treatment trial will assess whether CWC will result in reduced distress relative to Supportive Counselling in a young adult population in Bangalore, India. This study will yield important insights into the role of nonspecific factors versus the intervention's components in impacting COVID-19 related distress. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial was prospectively registered on the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12621001064897). ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval has been obtained from the participating institution, CHRIST University in Bangalore. Results of the trial will be submitted for publication in peer reviewed journals and findings presented at scientific conferences and to key service providers and policy makers.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Psychological Distress , Young Adult , Humans , Pandemics , Single-Blind Method , Universities , Psychosocial Intervention , India , Australia , Students , Treatment Outcome , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
7.
Psychother Psychosom ; 91(1): 63-72, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34875669

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Anxiety and depression have increased markedly during the COVID-19 pandemic. There is a lack of evidence-based strategies to address these mental health needs during the pandemic. OBJECTIVE: We aim to conduct a proof-of-concept trial of the efficacy of a brief group-based psychological intervention delivered via videoconferencing for adults in Australia distressed by the pandemic. METHODS: In this single-blind, parallel, randomised controlled trial, adults who screened positive for COVID-related psychological distress across Australia were randomly allocated to either a 6-session group-based program based on behavioural principles (n = 120) or enhanced usual care (EUC, n = 120). Primary outcome was total score on the Hospital Anxiety and Depression (HADS) anxiety and depression subscales assessed at baseline, 1 week posttreatment, 2 months (primary outcome time point), and 6 months after treatment, as well as secondary outcome measures of worry, sleep impairment, anhedonia, mood, and COVID-19-related stress. RESULTS: Between May 20, 2020, and October 20, 2020, 240 patients were enrolled into the trial. Relative to EUC, at 2 months participants receiving intervention showed greater reduction on anxiety (mean difference, 1.4 [95% CI, 0.3 to 2.6], p = 0.01; effect size, 0.4 [95% CI, 0.1 to 0.7]) and depression (mean difference, 1.6 [95% CI, 0.4 to 2.8], p = 0.009; effect size, 0.4 [95% CI, 0.2 to 0.7]) scales. These effects were maintained at 6 months. There were also greater reductions of worry, anhedonia, COVID-19-related fears, and contamination fears. CONCLUSIONS: This trial provides initial evidence that brief group-based behavioural intervention delivered via videoconferencing results in moderate reductions in common psychological problems arising during the COVID-19 pandemic. This program may offer a viable and scalable means to mitigate the rising mental health problems during the pandemic.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Adult , Depression/therapy , Humans , Mental Health , Pandemics , Psychosocial Intervention , SARS-CoV-2 , Single-Blind Method , Treatment Outcome , Videoconferencing
8.
Epilepsy Behav ; 112: 107388, 2020 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32882631

ABSTRACT

Research on social competence of children who undergo epilepsy surgery is limited. This cross-sectional study aimed to determine the frequency and pattern of impairments in social competence (domains: social skills, social adjustment, and social performance) in a cohort of children who underwent surgery for intractable epilepsy at a single epilepsy surgical center. In addition, we explored the relationships between social competence with epilepsy variables, surgical variables, and seizure outcomes. Fifteen children (5 to 16 years) who underwent focal cortical resection for intractable epilepsy more than 2 years ago (2.58-7.42 years) participated. Parents completed standardized, age-normed questionnaires, assessing three domains of social competence. Demographic and clinical information were obtained from parents and medical records and verified by Pediatric Neurologists and Clinical Nurse Consultant. Individual and group analyses were conducted. Seventy-three percent (n = 11/15) of children were seizure-free. Individual analyses revealed high rates of impairments (scores >1 standard deviation of the mean); 11 out of 15 children (73.3%) obtained a score that fell in the impaired range on at least one domain of social competence, with 5 of these 15 children (30.0%) obtaining impaired scores across domains. Conversely, group analyses of questionnaires completed by parents revealed that compared with norms, children had significant difficulties in all domains of social competence: social skills, social adjustment, and social performance. No significant relationships were found between domains of social competence and epilepsy and surgical variables. In conclusion, children who underwent epilepsy surgery have significantly reduced social competence relative to the norms. Longitudinal studies examining social competence pre- and postsurgery are needed to determine whether surgery improves social competence and whether this is dependent on epilepsy outcomes.


Subject(s)
Drug Resistant Epilepsy , Epilepsy , Child , Cross-Sectional Studies , Drug Resistant Epilepsy/surgery , Epilepsy/surgery , Humans , Social Skills , Surveys and Questionnaires , Treatment Outcome
9.
Cogn Emot ; 32(3): 579-592, 2018 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28492096

ABSTRACT

There is accumulating evidence that disgust plays an important role in prejudice toward individuals with obesity, but that research is primarily based on self-reported emotions. In four studies, we examined whether participants displayed a physiological marker of disgust (i.e. levator labii activity recorded using facial electromyography) in response to images of obese individuals, and whether these responses corresponded with their self-reported disgust to those images. All four studies showed the predicted self-reported disgust response toward images of obese individuals. Study 1 further showed that participants exhibited more levator activity to images of obese individuals than to neutral images. However, Studies 2-4 failed to provide any evidence that the targets' body size affected levator responses. These findings suggest that disgust may operate at multiple levels, and that the disgust response to images of obese individuals may be more of a cognitive-conceptual one than a physiological one.


Subject(s)
Attitude to Health , Disgust , Facial Expression , Obesity/psychology , Self Report , Adolescent , Adult , Electromyography/methods , Emotions/physiology , Face/physiology , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prejudice , Young Adult
10.
Curr Obes Rep ; 4(3): 324-9, 2015 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26627490

ABSTRACT

Obesity is a major public health concern worldwide. Because individual-level interventions have been unsuccessful at curbing obesity rates, there is an emphasis on public health approaches. In addition to testing the effectiveness of any public health interventions, it is important to consider the ethical implications of these interventions in order to protect the public's rights and promote overall well-being. In this paper, we review public health approaches to obesity in three broad domains (changes to the socio-communicative environment, changes to the economic environment, and changes to the physical environment/access) and consider the potential ethical issues that arise in each of those domains. We suggest that interventions that target the physical environment/access (making it easier for people to engage in healthy behaviors), that target the entire population (rather than just individuals with obesity), and that focus on health behaviors (rather than on weight) have the least potential for ethical concerns.


Subject(s)
Health Policy , Health Promotion/ethics , Obesity/prevention & control , Obesity/therapy , Public Health/ethics , Body Weight , Human Rights , Humans
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...