Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Neuroradiol J ; 35(4): 490-496, 2022 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34872414

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The cardiovascular risk in Parkinson's disease (PD) remains uncertain and controversial. Some studies suggest PD patients present an increased risk of cerebrovascular disease. We aimed to study the prevalence of neuroimaging cerebrovascular biomarkers in PD patients compared to controls, using an accurate and complete magnetic resonance (MR) imaging evaluation. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Neuroimaging sub-study within a larger cross-sectional case-control study. An enriched subgroup of PD patients (≤10 years since diagnosis) with at least a moderate cardiovascular mortality risk based on a Systematic COronary Risk Evaluation (SCORE) was compared to community-based controls regarding neuroimaging biomarkers. Patients underwent a high-resolution T1-weighted MR imaging sequence at 3.0 T to visualize neuromelanin. A 3D SWI FFE, sagittal 3D T1-weighted, axial FLAIR and diffusion-weighted image sequences were obtained. RESULTS: The study included 47 patients, 24 with PD and 23 controls. PD patients presented a reduced area and signal intensity of the substantia nigra and locus coeruleus on neuromelanin-sensitive MR. The median SCORE was 5% in both groups. No significant differences regarding white matter hyperintensities (OR 4.84, 95% CI 0.50, 47.06), lacunes (OR 0.43, 95% CI 0.07, 2.63), microbleeds (OR 0.64, 95% CI 0.13, 3.26), or infarcts (0.95, 95% CI 0.12, 7.41) was found. The frequency of these neuroimaging biomarkers was very low in both groups. CONCLUSION: The present study does not support an increased prevalence of neuroimaging cerebrovascular biomarkers in PD patients.


Subject(s)
Parkinson Disease , Biomarkers , Case-Control Studies , Cross-Sectional Studies , Humans , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Neuroimaging
2.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34007239

ABSTRACT

Parkinson's disease (PD) is a prevalent neurodegenerative disorder, and levodopa (L-dopa) remains the most efficacious drug treatment for PD and a gold-standard for symptom control. Nonetheless, a significant majority of PD patients develop motor fluctuations over their disease course, with a significant impact on quality-of-life, meaning control of such complications translates into a fundamental clinical need. Catechol-O-methyl transferase (COMT) inhibitors (COMT-i) are used as first-line adjuvant therapy to L-dopa for end-of-dose (EoD) motor fluctuations, since they increase L-dopa availability in the brain by inhibiting its peripheral metabolism. Opicapone (OPC), a once-daily, long-acting COMT-i, is the most recent and potent of its class, having been licensed in Europe in 2016 as an add-on to preparations of L-dopa/DOPA decarboxylase inhibitors in PD patients with EoD motor fluctuations. More recently, it has also received approval in the USA and Japan in 2020. Two high-quality positive efficacy studies (double-blind Phase III clinical trials) established OPC efficacy with significant reduction in OFF time (average 60 minutes vs placebo), without concomitant increase of distressing dyskinesias during ON time. These beneficial effects were sustained in open-label extension studies, without unexpected safety issues or adverse events, with dyskinesia having been the most frequent complaint. OPC also avoids liver toxicity and gastrointestinal issues compared with previous COMT-i. In this review, we aimed to cover OPC's lifecycle (synthesis to commercialization), its clinical pharmacological data, safety, tolerability and pharmacovigilance evidence, and discuss its role in the management of motor fluctuations in PD as well as its emerging place in international recommendations.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...