Surgical tactics of two-segmental cervical degenerative diseases: risk factors retrospective assessment and preoperative planning.

Background: Currently, in the specialized literature there are no substantiated clinical and radiological indications for differentiated use of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) and anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion (ACCF) in the treatment of patients with two-segmental cervical degenerative diseases. The objectives of this study were to (I) identify risk factors that were associated with unsatisfactory results of two-level ACDF and one-level ACCF in the treatment of patients with cervical degenerative diseases despite current perioperative management, and (II) develop a clinical and radiological algorithm for personalized surgical tactics. Methods: We retrospectively identified risk factors for the development of unsatisfactory clinical postoperative results after two-level ACDF (n=81) and one-level ACCF (n=78), operated in the period of 2009-2019 for two-segmental cervical degenerative disease. Results: Satisfactory clinical results after two-level ACDF were noted in cases with total kyphotic deformity of less than 15°; local kyphotic deformity less than 10˚; the absence of circumferential spondylotic cervical stenosis; the absence of a myelopathic lesion at the level of the vertebral body; absence of migrating intervertebral disk (IVD) hernia more than 1/3 of the vertebral body; T1 slope vertebra less than 15°; IVD degeneration according to Suzuki A. 0-II; facet joint (FJ) degeneration according to Okamoto A. I-III; interbody height (IH) more than 2 mm. Satisfactory clinical results after single-level ACCF were registered in cases with IVD degeneration according to Suzuki A. III; FJ degeneration according to Okamoto A. IV-V; IH 3 mm or less; regardless of the cervical lordosis, the angle of local kyphotic deformity and T1 slope, the presence of circumferential spondylotic cervical stenosis, the localization of the myelopathic lesion and the distance of migration IVD herniation. Conclusions: Individual planning and differentiated implementation of ACDF and ACCF in patients with two-segmental cervical degenerative disease, taking into account a comprehensive preoperative clinical and radiological assessment, contributes to the effective elimination of existing neurological symptoms, reducing the intensity of neck pain and upper limbs pain, restoring the functional state and quality of patients' lives in the minimum 24 months postoperative period, as well as reducing the number of postoperative complications and reoperations.

Treatment of the two-level degenerative cervical disk diseases based on algorithmic anterior approach: a multicenter prospective study.

To analyze the effectiveness of an algorithmic anterior approach to the surgical treatment of patients with two-level cervical degenerative disk disease based on the preoperative clinical and imaging parameters. The study included 244 patients with two-level cervical degenerative disk disease. Three groups of patients were evaluated at 3 neurosurgical centers between 2016-2019. The prospective group (Group I, n = 126) consisted of patients who were treated using an algorithm to decide whether they should be treated with a two-level Total Disk replacement (TDR), Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion (ACDF) and hybrid technique. The control group (Group II, n = 118) consisted of patients who underwent two-level anterior decompression with TDR, ACDF and hybrid stabilization between 2005-2015. Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) neck pain, VAS upper limbs pain, Neck Disability Index (NDI), SF-36, Macnab and Nurick scales were collected. Perioperative complications were identified. At 2 years of follow up Group I had significantly better clinical outcomes based on VAS neck pain score (p = 0.02), VAS upper limbs pain (p = 0.04), NDI score (p = 0.02), SF-36 score (p = 0.01), satisfaction with surgery on the Macnab scale (p < 0.001) and outcome of surgery based on Nurick scale (p < 0.001). Complication rate was lower in Group I, 6.3% compared to 24.6% in Group II, p = 0.0001. The algorithmic anterior approach to the surgical treatment of patients with two-level cervical degenerative disk disease resulted in significant improvement of functional outcomes and a decrease in complications at a minimum 2 years of follow-up.

Poor Fusion Rates Following Cervical Corpectomy Reconstructed With an Expandable Cage: Minimum 2-Year Radiographic and Clinical Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Expandable cages are often used to reconstruct cervical corpectomies but there are few long-term follow-up studies with large numbers. OBJECTIVE: To analyze the clinical and radiographic results of cervical corpectomy reconstructed with expandable cages for degenerative stenosis. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of 78 patients with degenerative cervical stenosis treated with a corpectomy reconstructed with an expandable cage. We evaluated the clinical and radiographic outcomes, as well as complications of the procedure at a minimum 2-yr follow-up. RESULTS: There was a decrease in the visual analog scale pain average from 75 mm to 8.5 mm (P = .02); a decrease in the Neck Disability Index average from 55% to 12% (P = .009); and improvement in the Japanese Orthopaedic Association average from 12 to 14 points (P = .01). There was a change in cervical lordosis (Cobb method) average from -9.3° to -15.1° (P = .002), without significant loss of lordosis (P = .63). The fusion rate, by criteria of the Cervical Spine Research Society (CSRS), was low: using dynamic X-rays - 50% (n = 39/78) and using computed tomography (CT) - 47.4% (n = 37/78). A total of 11 patients (14.1%) suffered complications. CONCLUSION: To our knowledge, this is the largest series (78) with a minimum 2-yr follow-up in the literature and the first using the dynamic radiographic and CT criteria endorsed by the CSRS. Using these criteria, our fusion rates were much lower than all previous reports in the literature. Despite this, patient-reported outcomes were reasonable. There was a relatively low incidence of perioperative complications, most of which were likely not implant-specific and there was only 1 case of implant failure.