Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int ; 31(23): 34144-34158, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38696016

ABSTRACT

There is a need for innovative strategies to decrease the mobility of metal(loids) including arsenic (As) and cadmium (Cd) in agricultural soils, including rice paddies, so as to minimize dietary exposure to these toxic elements. Iron (Fe)-modified biochars (FBCs) are used to immobilize As and Cd in soil-water systems, but there is a lack of clarity on optimal methods for preparing FBCs because there are only limited studies that directly compare BCs impregnated with Fe under different conditions. There is also a lack of information on the long-term performance of FBCs in flooded soil environments, where reductive dissolution of Fe (oxy)hydroxide phases loaded onto biochar surfaces may decrease the effectiveness of FBCs. This study uses material characterization methods including FTIR, SEM-EDX, BET, and adsorption isotherm experiments to investigate the effects of Fe-impregnation methods (pH, pyrolysis sequence, and sonication) on the morphology and mineralogy of Fe loaded onto the biochar surface, and to FBC adsorbent properties for arsenate (As(V)), arsenite (As(III)), and Cd. Acidic impregnation conditions favored the adsorption of As(III) onto amorphous Fe phases that were evenly distributed on the biochar surface, including within the biochar pore structure. The combination of sonication with acidic Fe-impregnation conditions led to the best adsorption capacities for As(V) and As(III) (4830 and 11,166 µg As g-1 biochar, respectively). Alkaline Fe-impregnation conditions led to the highest Cd adsorption capacity of 3054 µg Cd g-1 biochar, but had poor effectiveness as an As adsorbent. Amending soil with 5% (w/w) of an acid-impregnated and sonicated FBC was more effective than an alkaline-impregnated FBC or ferrihydrite in decreasing porewater As concentrations. The acid-impregnated FBC also had greater longevity, decreasing As by 54% and 56% in two flooded phases, probably due to the greater stability of Fe(III) within the biochar pore structure that may have a direct chemical bond to the biochar surface. This study demonstrates that FBCs can be designed with selectivity towards different As species or Cd and that they can maintain their effectiveness under anaerobic soil conditions. This is the first study to systematically test how impregnation conditions affect the stability of FBCs in soils under multiple drying-rewetting cycles.


Subject(s)
Arsenic , Charcoal , Iron , Soil Pollutants , Soil , Charcoal/chemistry , Arsenic/chemistry , Soil/chemistry , Iron/chemistry , Soil Pollutants/chemistry , Adsorption , Cadmium/chemistry
2.
Sci Total Environ ; 912: 169264, 2024 Feb 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38092207

ABSTRACT

The interactions with soil mineral surfaces are among the factors that determine the mobility and bioavailability of organic contaminants and of nutrients present in dissolved organic matter (DOM) in soil and aquatic environments. While most studies focus on high molar mass organic matter fractions (e.g., humic and fulvic acids), very few studies investigate the impact of DOM constituents in competitive sorption. Here we assess the sorption behavior of a heavily used herbicide (i.e., glyphosate) and a component of DOM (i.e., a peptide) at the water/goethite interface, inclusive of potential glyphosate-peptide interactions. We used in-situ ATR-FTIR (attenuated total reflectance Fourier-transform infrared) spectroscopy to study sorption kinetics and mechanisms of interaction as well as conformational changes to the secondary structure of the peptide. NMR (nuclear magnetic resonance) spectroscopy was used to assess the level of interaction between glyphosate and the peptide and changes to the peptide' secondary structure in solution. For the first time, we illustrate competition for sorption sites results in co-sorption of glyphosate and peptide molecules that affects the extent, kinetics, and mechanism of interaction of each with the surface. In the presence of the peptide, the formation of outer-sphere glyphosate-goethite complexes is favored albeit inner-sphere glyphosate-goethite bonds (i.e., POFe) are still formed. The presence of glyphosate induces secondary structural shifts of the sorbed peptide that maximizes the formation of H-bonds with the goethite surface. However, glyphosate and the peptide do not seem to interact with one another in solution nor at the goethite surface upon sorption. The results of this work highlight potential consequences of competition for sorption sites, for example the transport of organic contaminants and nutrient-rich (i.e., nitrogen) DOM components in relevant environmental systems. Predicting the rate and extent with which organic pollutants are removed from solution by a given solid is also one of the most critical factors for the design of effective sorption systems in engineering applications.


Subject(s)
Glyphosate , Iron Compounds , Minerals , Adsorption , Minerals/chemistry , Soil/chemistry , Peptides
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...