Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Cornea ; 36(11): 1373-1376, 2017 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28834818

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To assess the agreement between a swept-source optical biometry device (IOLMaster 700) and a Scheimpflug-based topography device (Pentacam HR) in measuring the corneal diameter. METHODS: A total of 100 eyes from 100 cataract surgery candidates were enrolled. The white-to-white (WTW) distance measurements provided by both devices were recorded and analyzed. A paired t test was performed to compare the mean values of the WTW distance between the IOLMaster 700 and Pentacam HR. The Bland-Altman analysis was used to evaluate the agreement between the measurements of both devices. RESULTS: Mean age (±SD) of the participants was 65.9 ± 3.3 years, and 58 (58%) were men. The mean WTW distances measured by the IOLMaster 700 and Pentacam HR were 11.72 ± 0.45 mm and 11.41 ± 0.42 mm, respectively (P < 0.001). The overall 95% limits of agreement were -0.17 and 0.78 mm. The 95% limits of agreement between the measurements of the 2 devices were -0.30 and 0.84 versus -0.07 and 0.72 for eyes with WTW distances of ≤11.50 mm versus >11.50 mm, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: According to the results of this study, the IOLMaster 700 may overestimate the WTW distance measurements by up to 0.78 mm compared with the Pentacam HR, so these 2 devices should not be used interchangeably for this purpose. The agreement is somehow weaker for eyes with WTW distances of 11.50 mm or less than those with WTW distances greater than 11.50 mm.


Subject(s)
Biometry/instrumentation , Cornea/anatomy & histology , Corneal Topography/instrumentation , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Axial Length, Eye/anatomy & histology , Cataract Extraction , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Reproducibility of Results
2.
J Ophthalmic Vis Res ; 6(2): 92-100, 2011 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22454717

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To report orthoptic changes after photorefractive keratectomy (PRK). METHODS: This interventional case series included 297 eyes of 150 patients scheduled for PRK. Complete ophthalmologic evaluations focusing on orthoptic examinations were performed before and 3 months after PRK. RESULTS: Before PRK, 2 (1.3%) patients had esotropia which remained unchanged; 3 (2%) patients had far exotropia which improved after the procedure. Of 12 cases (8%) with initial exotropia at near, 3 (2%) cases became orthophoric, however 6 patients (4%) developed new near exotropia. A significant reduction in convergence and divergence amplitudes (P < 0.001) and a significant increase in near point of convergence (NPC) (P < 0.006) were noticed after PRK. A reduction ≥ 10 PD in convergence amplitude and ≥ 5 PD in divergence amplitude occurred in 10 and 5 patients, respectively. Four patients had initial NPC > 10 cm which remained unchanged after surgery. Out of 9 (6%) patients with baseline stereopsis > 60 seconds of arc, 2 (1.33%) showed an improvement in stereopsis following PRK. No patient developed diplopia postoperatively. CONCLUSION: Preexisting strabismus may improve or remain unchanged after PRK, and new deviations can develop following the procedure. A decrease in fusional amplitudes, an increase in NPC, and an improvement in stereopsis may also occur after PRK. Preoperative evaluation of orthoptic status for detection of baseline abnormalities and identification of susceptible patients seem advisable.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...