Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Magn Reson Med ; 67(2): 531-40, 2012 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21656561

ABSTRACT

The variation of the native T(1) (T(10)) of different tissues and B(1) transmission-field inhomogeneity at 3 T are major contributors of errors in the quantification of breast dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI. To address these issues, we have introduced new enhancement indices derived from saturation-recovery snapshot-FLASH (SRSF) images. The stability of the new indices, i.e., the SRSF enhancement factor (EF(SRSF)) and its simplified version (EF'(SRSF)) with respect to differences in T(10) and B(1) inhomogeneity was compared against a typical index used in breast dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI, i.e., the enhancement ratio (ER), by using computer simulations. Imaging experiments with Gd-DTPA-doped gel phantoms and a female volunteer were also performed. A lower error was observed in the new indices compared to enhancement ratio in the presence of typical T(10) variation and B(1) inhomogeneity. At changes of relaxation rate (ΔR(1)) of 8 s(-1), the differences between a T(10) of 1266 and 566 ms are <1, 12, and 58%, respectively, for EF(SRSF), EF'(SRSF), and ER, whereas differences of 20, 8, and 51%, respectively, result from a 50% B(1) field reduction at the same ΔR(1). These quantification techniques may be a solution to minimize the effect of T(10) variation and B(1) inhomogeneity on dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of the breast at 3 T.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/diagnosis , Breast/pathology , Image Enhancement/methods , Image Processing, Computer-Assisted/methods , Mammography/methods , Computer Simulation , Female , Humans , Phantoms, Imaging , Sensitivity and Specificity
2.
J Magn Reson Imaging ; 31(1): 234-9, 2010 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20027594

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To quantify B(1) transmission-field inhomogeneity in breast imaging of normal volunteers at 3T using 3D T(1)-weighted spoiled gradient echo and to assess the resulting errors in enhancement ratio (ER) measured in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) studies of the breast. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 25 volunteers underwent breast imaging at 3T and the B(1) transmission-fields were mapped. Gel phantoms that simulate pre- and postcontrast breast tissue T(1) were developed. The effects of B(1)-field inhomogeneity on ER, as measured using a 3D spoiled gradient echo sequence, were investigated by computer simulation and experiments on gel phantoms. RESULTS: It was observed that by using the patient orientation and MR scanner employed in this study, the B(1) transmission-field field is always reduced toward the volunteer's right side. The median B(1)-field in the right breast is reduced around 40% of the expected B(1)-field. For some volunteers the amplitude was reduced by more than 50%. Computer simulation and experiment showed that a reduction in B(1)-field decreases ER. This reduction increases with both B(1)-field error and contrast agent uptake. CONCLUSION: B(1) transmission-field inhomogeneity is a critical issue in breast imaging at 3T and causes errors in quantifying ER. These errors would be sufficient to reduce the conspicuity of a malignant lesion and could result in reduced sensitivity for cancer detection.


Subject(s)
Algorithms , Artifacts , Breast/anatomy & histology , Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted/methods , Imaging, Three-Dimensional/methods , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Adult , Contrast Media , Female , Humans , Image Enhancement/methods , Reproducibility of Results , Sensitivity and Specificity
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...