The use of laboratory and physiological parameters in predicting mortality in sepsis induced hypotension and septic shock patients attending the emergency department.

INTRODUCTION: In this study, we sought to determine whether laboratory and physiological parameters can be useful in predicting mortality in patients with sepsis-induced hypotension and septic shock. METHODOLOGY: This prospective cohort study was carried out in the emergency department at an academic medical center. A total of 51 patients met enrollment criteria during the study period and 41 of them were included in the study. Inclusion criteria were patients 18 years old or older, diagnosed to have either sepsis-induced hypotension or septic shock and investigated sepsis marker (blood lactate and leukocytes) measured. Other physiological variables were also measured in this study. The main outcome measure was 30-day mortality. Kaplan-Meier, Log-rank and Cox's methods were used for statistical analysis using SPSS version 12.0.1. RESULTS: 61% were diagnosed to have sepsis-induced hypotension and 39% were diagnosed with septic shock. Twenty two (54%) deaths occurred within the 30 day follow up. The overall mean blood lactate level and leukocyte counts were 3.52 mmol/L (5D = 2.29) and 11.37 x 109 (SD = 6.38) respectively. A Cox Proportional Hazard Analysis revealed an increase in blood lactate levels in the ED was associated with an increased risk of death (B = 0.35, HR = 1.45, 95% CI 1.22, 1.73, p < 0.001). However no significant correlation between the physiological parameters and the 30-day mortality. Patients with septic shock state prior to initial presentation has a lower 30 day survival compared to any other septic conditions. CONCLUSION: Our results support blood lactate level as a promising risk stratification tool when compared with leukocytes counts and other physiological parameters. The multivariate analysis showed that for every increment of lactate value of 1 mmol/L, the hazards of dying are expected to increase by 1.5 times (p < 0.001).

An eight-year review of blood culture and susceptibility among sepsis cases in an emergency department in Northeastern Malaysia.

An understanding of common pathogens and their antibiotic sensitivity patterns is critical for proper management of sepsis in Emergency Department (ED). The goal of the study was to identify common organisms isolated from blood cultures of patients attended to ED and their antimicrobial susceptibility. Beginning from 2002, all cases of positive blood culture collected by the ED, Hospital Universiti Sains Malaysia (HUSM) were recorded and analysed. Over the period of eight years, we documented 995 cases of positive blood cultures. Of these samples, 549 (55.2%) were Gram-negative bacteria; 419 (42.1%) were Gram-positive bacteria; 10 (1.0%) were anaerobic organisms; 10 (1.0%) were fungus; and 7 (0.7%) cases were mixed organisms. Gram-negative bacteria were observed to develop more resistance to antimicrobial agents, especially those commonly used in an outpatient setting with less than 80% sensitivity to ampicillin, cotrimoxazole and ciprofloxacin. By contrast, there has been no marked change in the sensitivity trends of Gram-positive bacteria over the same period. In conclusion, ED physicians are more equipped to initiate empirical antimicrobial therapy especially when dealing with possibility of Gram-negative sepsis.

An eight-year review of blood culture and susceptibility among sepsis cases in an emergency department in North eastern Malaysia

An understanding of common pathogens and their antibiotic sensitivity patterns is critical for proper management of sepsis in Emergency Department (ED). The goal of the study was to identify common organisms isolated from blood cultures of patients attended to ED and their antimicrobial susceptibility. Beginning from 2002, all cases of positive blood culture collected by the ED, Hospital Universiti Sains Malaysia (HUSM) were recorded and analysed. Over the period of eight years, we documented 995 cases of positive blood cultures. Of these samples, 549 (55.2%) were Gram-negative bacteria; 419 (42.1%) were Gram-positive bacteria; 10 (1.0%) were anaerobic organisms; 10 (1.0%) were fungus; and 7 (0.7%) cases were mixed organisms. Gram-negative bacteria were observed to develop more resistance to antimicrobial agents, especially those commonly used in an outpatient setting with less than 80% sensitivity to ampicillin, cotrimoxazole and ciprofloxacin. By contrast, there has been no marked change in the sensitivity trends of Gram-positive bacteria over the same period. In conclusion, ED physicians are more equipped to initiate empirical antimicrobial therapy especially when dealing with possibility of Gram-negative sepsis.