ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: The presence of psychiatric comorbidity in some neurological disorders is common. A bi-directional influence between some psychiatric and neurological disorders has been discussed, but not widely studied. There is an absence of literature on the typology and rates of neurology consultations in different types of psychiatric inpatients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Cross-sectional study based on real world data on patients who had a neurological consultation during hospitalization on a psychiatric ward. RESULTS: The most frequent reasons for visits to neurologists in our study were cluster 'Epilepsy/other types of non-epileptic seizures' (n = 177, 36.44%), followed by cluster 'Movement disorders' (n = 77, 20.48%), 'Cognitive disorder' (n = 69, 18.35%), and finally cluster 'Neuropathy' (n = 21, 5.59%). The most frequent type of psychiatric patient who required neurologic consultation presented a psychotic disorder (n = 100, 26.60%), follow by problem behavior (n = 82, 21.81%), bipolar disorder (n = 78, 20.78%), depressive disorder (n = 42, 11.17%) and autism spectrum disorder (n = 20, 5.32%). We found a statistically significant relationship between (problem behavior and intellectual disability) and neurologic consultation for epilepsy/other types of non-epileptic seizures, and between (depressive disorder, bipolar disorder, autism spectrum disorder and intellectual disability) and neurologic consultation for movement disorders. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study in the literature which analyzes the rates and typology of neurologic consultations in people hospitalized with psychiatric disorders. A deep knowledge of epilepsy, movement disorders and cognitive disorders should be required for health professionals to treat psychiatric inpatients appropriately. Patients with particular psychiatric disorders seem to require a higher number of neurologic consultations than others during their hospitalization.
TITLE: Comorbilidad neurológica en pacientes psiquiátricos ingresados: evidencia sobre interconsultas de neurología en un centro español.Introducción. La presencia de comorbilidad psiquiátrica en algunos trastornos neurológicos es frecuente. Se ha discutido sobre una influencia bidireccional entre algunos trastornos psiquiátricos y neurológicos, pero este hecho no se ha estudiado ampliamente. Existe escasa información en la bibliografía sobre la tipología y la prevalencia de las interconsultas de neurología en los diferentes tipos de pacientes psiquiátricos hospitalizados. Materiales y métodos. Estudio transversal basado en datos reales sobre pacientes que necesitaron una interconsulta de neurología durante su hospitalización en salud mental. Resultados. Los motivos más frecuentes que requirieron una interconsulta de neurología en nuestro estudio fueron el clúster 'Epilepsia/otros tipos de crisis no epilépticas' (n = 177; 36,44%), seguido del clúster 'Trastornos del movimiento' (n = 77; 20,48%), el clúster 'Trastorno cognitivo' (n = 69; 18,35%) y, por último, el clúster 'Neuropatía' (n = 21; 5,9%). El tipo más frecuente de paciente psiquiátrico que requirió consulta neurológica presentó un trastorno psicótico (n = 100; 26,6%), seguido de problemas de conducta (n = 82; 21,81%), trastorno bipolar (n = 78; 20,78%), trastorno depresivo (n = 42; 11,17%) y trastorno del espectro autista (n = 20; 5,32%). Se encontró una relación estadísticamente significativa entre problemas de conducta y discapacidad intelectual e interconsulta de neurología por epilepsia/otros tipos de crisis no epilépticas, y entre trastorno depresivo, trastorno bipolar, trastorno del espectro autista y discapacidad intelectual e interconsulta de neurología por trastornos del movimiento. Conclusiones. Éste es el primer estudio en la bibliografía que analiza la frecuencia y la tipología de las interconsultas de neurología en personas hospitalizadas con trastornos psiquiátricos. Debe requerirse a los profesionales que traten a pacientes de salud mental hospitalizados un conocimiento profundo en epilepsia, trastornos del movimiento y trastornos cognitivos. Algunos pacientes con determinados trastornos psiquiátricos parecen necesitar un mayor número de interconsultas de neurología que otros durante su hospitalización.
Subject(s)
Comorbidity , Mental Disorders , Nervous System Diseases , Referral and Consultation , Humans , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Mental Disorders/epidemiology , Male , Spain/epidemiology , Nervous System Diseases/complications , Middle Aged , Adult , Neurology , Inpatients , Aged , Epilepsy/complicationsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Non-initiation occurs when the doctor prescribes a new pharmacological treatment to a patient who does not fill the prescription. Non-initiation prevalence estimates range between 6% and 28% in Primary Care (PC) and it is associated with poorer clinical outcomes, more sick-leave days and higher costs. To date, the reasons for non-initiation have not been explored using a qualitative framework. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study was to identify reasons for medication non-initiation among PC patients with distinct treatment profiles (acute, chronic symptomatic and asymptomatic, and mental disorders). METHODS: An exploratory, explanatory qualitative study based on Grounded Theory. We conducted individual semi-structured interviews with 30â¯PC patients. A constant comparative method of analysis was performed. RESULTS: The results were similar for all therapeutic groups. The decision to initiate treatment is multifactorial. Users make a risk-benefit assessment which is influenced by their beliefs about the pathology and the medication, their emotional reaction, health literacy and cultural factors. The patients' context and relationship with the health system influence decision-making. CONCLUSIONS: The decision to initiate a treatment is strongly influenced by factors that health professionals can discuss with patients. Health professionals should explore patients' beliefs about benefits and risks to help them make informed decisions and promote shared decision-making. General practitioners should ensure that patients understand the benefits and risks of disease and treatment, while explaining alternative treatments, encouraging patients to ask questions and supporting their treatment decisions.
Subject(s)
General Practitioners , Health Literacy , Mental Disorders , Decision Making , Humans , Qualitative ResearchABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Although mild to moderate major depressive disorder (MDD) is one of the main reasons for consulting a general practitioner (GP), there is still no international consensus on the most appropriate therapeutic approach. METHODS: The aim of this study is to evaluate the clinical effectiveness of watchful waiting (WW) compared with the use of antidepressants (ADs) for the treatment of mild to moderate depressive symptoms in 263 primary care (PC) usual-practice patients in a 12-month pragmatic non-randomised controlled trial. Both longitudinal and per-protocol analyses were performed, through a multilevel longitudinal analysis and a sensitivity analysis. RESULTS: We observed a statistically significant time x treatment interaction in the severity of depression (Patient Health Questionnaire, PHQ-9) and disability (World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule, WHODAS) in favour of the AD group at 6 months but not at 12 months. The effect size of this difference was small. No statistically significant differences were observed between groups in severity of anxiety (Beck Anxiety Inventory, BAI) or health-related quality-of-life (EuroQol-5D, EQ-5D). Sensitivity analysis and per-protocol analysis showed no differences between the two groups in any of the evaluated scales. CONCLUSIONS: Superiority of either treatment (WW and AD) was not demonstrated in patients treated for depression in PC after one year of follow-up.
Subject(s)
Antidepressive Agents/therapeutic use , Depression/therapy , Depressive Disorder/therapy , Watchful Waiting , Adult , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Depression/drug therapy , Depressive Disorder/drug therapy , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Primary Health Care/methods , Quality of Life , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
Reducing public stigma could improve patients' access to care, recovery and social integration. The aim of the study was to evaluate a mass media intervention, which aimed to reduce the mental health, related stigma among the general population in Catalonia (Spain). We conducted a cross-sectional population-based survey of a representative sample of the Catalan non-institutionalized adult population (n=1019). We assessed campaign awareness, attitudes to people with mental illness (CAMI) and intended behaviour (RIBS). To evaluate the association between campaign awareness and stigma, multivariable regression models were used. Over 20% of respondents recognized the campaign when prompted, and 11% when unprompted. Campaign aware individuals had better attitudes on the benevolence subscale of the CAMI than unaware individuals (P=0.009). No significant differences in authoritarianism and support for community mental health care attitudes subscales were observed. The campaign aware group had better intended behaviour than the unaware group (P<0.01). The OBERTAMENT anti-stigma campaign had a positive impact to improve the attitudes and intended behaviour towards people with mental illness of the Catalan population. The impact on stigma was limited to attitudes related to benevolence. A wider range of anti-stigma messages could produce a stronger impact on attitudes and intended behaviour.
