Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Ren Fail ; 34(5): 571-6, 2012.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22452450

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have demonstrated the role of inflammation in diabetic nephropathy (DN). Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) rather than other white cell parameters was found to be a useful inflammatory marker to predict adverse outcomes in medical and surgical conditions. Nevertheless, the value of NLR in predicting DN has not been elucidated. METHOD: An observational study included 338 diabetic patients, who were followed at our clinic between 2007 and 2009. We arranged our patients into tertiles according to their 2007 NLR. The primary outcome was continuous decrease of GFR >12 mL/min between 2007 and 2009 with the last GFR <60 mL/min. RESULT: The lowest NLR tertile had fewer patients (2.7%) with primary outcome (i.e., worsening renal function) compared with middle and highest NLR tertiles, which had more patients with primary outcomes (8.7% and 11.5%, respectively) with a significant p-value 0.0164. When other potential confounders were individually analyzed with NLR tertile, the NLR tertiles remained a significant predictor of poor GFR outcome in the presence of other variables (hemoglobin A1C, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, age, and congestive heart failure with p-values 0.018, 0.019, 0.017, 0.033, and 0.022, respectively). CONCLUSION: NLR predicted the worsening of the renal function in diabetic patients. Further studies are needed to confirm this result.


Subject(s)
Diabetic Nephropathies/blood , Glomerular Filtration Rate , Lymphocytes/pathology , Neutrophils/pathology , Blood Cell Count , Diabetic Nephropathies/physiopathology , Disease Progression , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Glycated Hemoglobin/metabolism , Humans , Leukocyte Count , Male , Middle Aged , Prognosis , Retrospective Studies , Time Factors
2.
Ren Fail ; 33(5): 486-8, 2011.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21500987

ABSTRACT

The 'Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative' guidelines recommend laboratory reporting of a calculated estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). The United Kingdom and several states already mandate reporting eGFR for every laboratory serum creatinine (sCr) measurement. In our study, we evaluated the impact of reporting eGFR on the management of hospitalized patients. We reviewed the medical records for 2000 patients, 1000 pre- and 1000 post-reporting eGFR. We excluded patients with previous diagnosis of chronic kidney disease, acute kidney failure, and end-stage renal disease. We analyzed the subgroup of patients with eGFR <60 and sCr <1.5 mg/dL. We did not notice an increase in the number of renal consult, ordering laboratory or imaging study to evaluate chronic kidney disease. The prescription habits did not change for nephrotoxic medications (nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and aminoglycosides). We did not find any change in the percentage of patients who received hydration for a radiological contrast study or the use of N-acetylcysteine. In conclusion, reporting eGFR did not improve the renal management of hospitalized patients.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/administration & dosage , Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions/prevention & control , Glomerular Filtration Rate , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/diagnosis , Aged , Contrast Media , Creatinine/blood , Female , Humans , Male
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...