Venous sample is superior to repeated skin-prick testing in blood donor haemoglobin second-line screening.

BACKGROUND: Blood donor haemoglobin concentration (Hb) is commonly measured from a skin-prick sample. However, the skin-prick sample is prone to preanalytical error and variation, which may lead to false deferrals due to low Hb. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: We assessed the efficacy of two second-line screening models for the evaluation of blood donors failing the initial skin-prick test. In the venous model (n = 305), Hb was measured from a venous sample at the donation site. In the skin-prick model (n = 331), two additional skin-prick samples were measured. All on-site Hb measurements were performed with HemoCue Hb201+ (HemoCue AB) point-of-care (POC) device. Hb in the venous samples was later also determined with a hematology analyzer (Sysmex XN, Sysmex Co.) to obtain the donor's correct Hb. A questionnaire evaluated Blood Service nurses' preferences regarding Hb assessment. RESULTS: Significantly less donors were deferred from donation with venous model (40%) than with skin-prick model (51%; chi-square test P = 0·004). Only two donors (0·7%) were incorrectly accepted in the venous model. Further, Blood Service nurses preferred venous model over skin-prick model. After the study, the venous model was implemented nationwide, and in the first two months after implementation, the deferral rate due to low Hb decreased from 2·7% to 1·9%. CONCLUSION: A venous sample for blood donor Hb second-line screening significantly decreased low Hb deferrals compared to repeated skin-prick testing without compromising donor safety. Valuable donations can be recovered by implementing a practical second-line screening model based on venous sampling.

ABO and D typing and alloantibody screening in marrow samples: relevance to intraosseous blood transfusion.

BACKGROUND: Blood transfusion through the intraosseous route is gaining popularity in emergency medicine. Pretransfusion peripheral blood (PB) samples are usually not available in these patients, leading to discrepancies in blood group typing and a possible delay in transferring to group-specific blood products. The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility of ABO and D typing and red blood cell alloantibody screening in marrow (BM) samples. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Direct and reverse ABO typing, D typing, and a two-cell alloantibody screen were performed in EDTA-anticoagulated BM samples with standard manual column agglutination techniques. EDTA-anticoagulated PB samples were used as controls. RESULTS: The mean age of the study subjects (n = 71) was 47 years (range, 1-82 years). All ABO groups and both D+ and D- types were represented. In all subjects, concordant results were observed for all analyses in BM and PB samples. In 15 (21%) of the samples, a discrepancy of one reaction strength step (1+) was observed in at least one of the analyses (Cohen's weighted κ = 0.993); this did not affect interpretation of the results. CONCLUSION: Blood group typing and alloantibody screening are feasible in BM samples, providing proof-of-concept that intraosseous samples for blood group serologic analyses can be collected from emergency patients before intraosseous blood transfusion. This will enable a timely transfer to group-specific blood products and enable conservation of the valuable universal-donor blood products.

Season and time of day affect capillary blood hemoglobin level and low hemoglobin deferral in blood donors: analysis in a national blood bank.

BACKGROUND: Low hemoglobin (Hb) is the most common reason for temporary blood donor deferral. However, factors that affect Hb measurement may not portray donor health but reflect external circumstances. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: The effects of season, time of day, donor age, ABO, and D on capillary blood Hb level (cHb) and low Hb deferral were analyzed in 1,396,645 donor registrations from the years 2010 to 2014 in a national blood bank. RESULTS: cHb was lower in the summer (July mean 154.1 g/L in men, 139.6 g/L in women) and in the evening (7 pm mean 153.8 g/L in men, 138.9 g/L in women) than in the winter (January mean 156.9 g/L in men, 141.8 g/L in women) and in the morning (11 am mean 157.2 g/L in men, 142.8 g/L in women; all p < 0.0001). This affected donor deferral due to low Hb, with 7.8% donors deferred in July at 7 pm and 1.6% deferred in January at 11 am (p < 0.0001). With age, cHb increased in women and decreased in men. The lowest cHb was observed in blood group A (mean 154.9 g/L in men, 140.3 g/L in women) and the highest in blood group B (mean 156.6 g/L in men, 141.5 g/L in women). D had no practically significant effect on cHb. CONCLUSION: External factors, which do not reflect donor health, affect cHb and donor deferral due to low Hb. These factors should be considered when donor eligibility guidelines and procedures are developed.