[Intra-abdominal vascular injuries after blunt abdominal trauma]. / Intraabdominelle Gefäßverletzungen nach stumpfem Bauchtrauma.

Vascular injuries and hemorrhaging are serious potential complications in the management of patients with blunt abdominal trauma. The treatment depends on the extent and localization and can range from surveillance to endovascular treatment up to open surgery. The keys to success include the focused assessment with sonography for trauma (FAST) management and timely decision making. Abdominal vascular trauma continues to be a difficult problem and open and endovascular techniques continue to evolve in order to address this complex disease process.

[Results of a single center vascular screening program in Germany]. / Ergebnisse eines monozentrischen Gefäßscreeningprogramms in Deutschland.

BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular diseases are the main cause of death in Europe with a relevant socioeconomic burden. A screening program for vascular diseases in asymptomatic persons with a defined risk constellation can lead to an early diagnosis. OBJECTIVE: The study examined a screening program for carotid stenosis, peripheral arterial occlusive disease (PAOD) and abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) in persons without any known vascular disease with respect to demographic data, risk factors, pre-existing conditions, medication intake, detection of pathological findings and/or findings requiring treatment. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Test subjects were invited using various information material and filled in a questionnaire on cardiovascular risk factors. The screening took place with measurement of the ABI and duplex sonography as a monocentric prospective single arm study within 1 year. Endpoints were the prevalence of risk factors and pathological and/or results requiring treatment. RESULTS: A total of 391 persons participated, 36% presented with at least 1 cardiovascular risk factor, 35.5% with 2 and 14.4% with 3 or more. The sonography showed results requiring control with a carotid stenosis of < 50-> 75% or occlusion in 9%. An AAA with a diameter of 3.0-4.5 cm was diagnosed in 0.9% and a pathological ABI < 0.9 or > 1.3 in 12.3%. The indications for a pharmacotherapy were found in 17% and no operation was recommended. CONCLUSION: The practicability of a screening program for carotid stenosis, PAOD and AAA of a defined risk population was shown. Vascular pathologies that required treatment were hardly found in the catchment area of the hospital. Consequently, the implementation of this screening program in Germany based on the collected data cannot currently be recommended in this form.

Long-term outcome and cancer incidence after abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.

PURPOSE: The influence of cancer development on long-term outcome after elective endovascular (EVAR) vs. open repair (OAR) of non-ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) was investigated. METHODS: Patient survival and cancer incidence were recorded for 18,802 patients registered with the AOK health insurance company in Germany who underwent EVAR (n = 14,218) and OAR (n = 4584) in the years 2010 to 2016 (men n = 16,086, women n = 2716). All patients were preoperatively and in their history cancer-free. RESULTS: 30.1% of EVAR and 27.6% of OAR patients (p ≤ .001) developed cancer after a follow-up period of up to 9 years (Kaplan-Meier estimated). Patients with cancer had a significantly less favorable outcome compared to patients with no cancer (HR 1.68; 95% CI 1.59-1.78, p < .001). After 9 years, the estimated survival of patients with and without cancer was 27.0% and 55.4%, respectively (p < .001). Survival of men and women did not differ significantly (HR 0.94; 95% CI 0.88-1.00, p = .061). In the Cox regression analysis (adjusted outcomes by operative approach, gender, age, and comorbidities), the postoperative cancer incidence was not significantly different between EVAR and OAR (HR 1.09; 95% CI 1.00-1.18, p = .051). However, EVAR showed an increased risk of postoperative development of abdominal cancer (HR 1.20; 95% CI 1.07-1.35, p = .002). 48.0% of all EVAR patients and 53.4% of all OAR patients survived in the follow-up period of up to 9 years. This difference was not significant (HR 0.96; 95% CI 0.91-1.02, p = .219). CONCLUSION: Cancer significantly worsened the long-term outcome after EVAR and OAR, without significant differences between the two repair methods in the overall cancer incidence. However, the higher abdominal cancer incidence with EVAR can affect quality of life including oncological therapy and therefore should be considered when determining the indication for surgery, and the patient should be informed about it.

Perioperative functional imaging after extracranial carotid endarterectomy for the detection of cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome.

INTRODUCTION: SyngoDynaPBVNeuro® is a tool to perform cerebral blood volume (CBV) measurements intraoperatively by functional imaging producing CT-like images. Aim of this prospective study was to analyze the clinical relevance and benefit of CBV measurement with regard to neurological complications like cerebral hyperfusion syndrome (CHS). METHODS: Forty-five patients undergoing endarterectomy (CEA) of the internal carotid artery were included; functional imaging with CBV measurement was performed before and after CEA. To evaluate and analyze CBV, six regions of interest (ROI) were identified for all patients with an additional ROI in patients with symptomatic ICA stenosis and previous stroke. The primary endpoint of the study was a perioperative change in CBV measurements. Secondary outcomes were incidence of stroke, TIA, CHS, and perioperative morbidity and mortality. RESULTS: Thirty-day stroke incidence and thirty-day mortality were 0%. Thirty-day morbidity was 6.7%. Two patients from the asymptomatic group suffered from transient neurological symptoms without signs of intracerebral infarction in CT or MR scan, meeting diagnostic criteria for CHS. In 83.3% of ROIs in these patients, an increase of blood volume was detected. Overall, 26.7% patients suffered from unilateral headache as expression of potential CHS. A total of 69.4% of ROIs in patients with postoperative unilateral headache showed an increase when comparing pre- and postoperative CBV measurements. CONCLUSION: The results show that increased CBV measured by functional imaging is a possible surrogate marker of neurological complications like CHS after CEA. By using intraoperative CBV measurement, the risk of CHS can be estimated early and appropriate therapeutic measures can be applied.

[Deep vein thrombosis as a primary symptom of abdominal aortic aneurysm : Bilateral deep vein thrombosis caused by infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm (15 cm in diameter) with complete compression of the inferior vena cava]. / Tiefe Venenthrombose als Primärsymptom eines abdominellen Aortenaneurysmas : Beidseitige 4-Etagen-TVT durch infrarenales Bauchaortenaneurysma (15 cm Durchmesser) mit vollständiger Kompression der V. cava inferior.

This article presents the case of a 70-year-old obese patient with severe bilateral leg pain due to deep vein thrombosis. After unsuccessful venous recanalization, computed tomography angiography revealed an abdominal aortic aneurysm 15 cm in diameter with total compression of the inferior vena cava. For venous decompression as well as rupture prophylaxis, conventional open surgical repair was performed.

The first case of traumatic internal carotid arterial dissection? Verneuil's case report from 1872.

Dissecting aneurysms of the internal carotid artery were considered as very rare disorders before the seventies. Undiagnosed carotid-artery dissections, however, may have gone hidden behind earlier reports of delayed "apoplexy" due to "traumatic carotid thrombosis". Here, we present a case report of delayed stroke after trauma, published by Aristide Verneuil in 1872 in the Bulletin de l'Académie de Médecine and cited under the heading of vascular rupture and dissecting aneurysm by Heinrich Quincke in 1876. Verneuil's case report represents, to our knowledge, the first detailed clinical description of a patient with a traumatic carotid dissection confirmed at autopsy. The author highlighted the diagnostic challenges of this case, head injury followed by delayed hemiplegia suggesting an intracranial bleeding.

[Diabetic foot syndrome-Part 2 : Revascularization, treatment alternatives, care structures, recurrency prophylaxis]. / Diabetisches Fußsyndrom ­ Teil 2 : Revaskularisation, Behandlungsalternativen, Versorgungsstrukturen, Rezidivprophylaxe.

Diabetic foot syndrome (DFS) is the most frequent reason for major amputations in Germany. The majority of foot lesions are triggered by repetitive pressure in diabetic polyneuropathy. Peripheral arterial occlusive disease (PAOD) impairs wound healing and is the main risk factor for amputations. The treatment of wounds and infections as well as timely revascularization are decisive. The use of endovascular and vascular surgical methods depends on the distribution pattern and length of the occlusion processes. Both procedures are complementary. Bypass surgery is of great importance for neuroischemic DFS. Multidisciplinary centers that provide revascularization in DFS can achieve an improvement of arterial blood flow in 90% of the cases and reduce the amputation rate by up to 80%. Due to the high recurrence rate of diabetic foot lesions, measures for secondary prophylaxis are of exceptional importance (podological and orthopedic technical care, foot surgery).

[Diabetic foot syndrome-Part 1 : Definition, pathophysiology, diagnostics and classification]. / Diabetisches Fußsyndrom ­ Teil 1 : Definition, Pathophysiologie, Diagnostik und Klassifikation.

There are ca. 8 million persons with diabetes mellitus living in Germany. A late sequelae of diabetes is the diabetic foot syndrome (DFS), the prevalence of which is greatly increasing. It comprises all alterations of the foot as a result of diabetic polyneuropathy as well as microvascular and macrovascular (peripheral arterial occlusive disease, PAOD) alterations. Many of the ca. 250,000 newly diagnosed diabetic foot ulcers per year become chronic wounds. Despite intensive efforts for prevention, early diagnosis and adequate wound care, ca. 13,000 persons with diabetes undergo major limb amputation in Germany every year. With consistent treatment in interdisciplinary centers and by exhausting all possible methods of wound treatment, pressure relief as well as arterial revascularization, the major amputation rate in patients with diabetic foot problems can be reduced by 80%. With a suitable strategy of prevention, the recurrence rate of foot ulcers would be reduced.

[Case load and quality indicators in the treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms]. / Fallzahlaufkommen und Qualitätsindikatoren bei der Versorgung des abdominellen Bauchaortenaneurysmas.

BACKGROUND: The MTL30 (mortality, transfer, length of stay) was proposed as a surrogate parameter for evaluating the quality of large and potentially complication-prone visceral surgical interventions. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to find out to what extent the MTL30 can be correlated with the results of the abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) registry of the German Institute for Vascular Health Research (DIGG) of the German Society for Vascular Surgery and Vascular Medicine (DGG) and with the case volume of the participating hospitals. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Elective endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) was performed in 14,282 patients and open repair (OAR) in 3923 patients. Case volume of the treating hospitals, hospital mortality, length of stay and transfer to another acute care hospital were determined 30 days after the index intervention. RESULTS: The hospital mortality was 1.3% for EVAR and 4.9% for OAR (p = 0.000), the MTL30 was 5.0% and 14.4%, respectively (p = 0.000). For EVAR, no relationship between case volume and hospital mortality (quintile 1: 1.0%; quintile 5: 1.3%) as well as case volume and MTL30 (quintile 1: 5.3%; quintile 5: 5.3%) could be demonstrated. Also in OAR there was no significant relationship between case volume and hospital mortality (quintile 1: 5.8%, quintile 5: 3.5%; p = 0.505) and case volume and MTL30 (quintile 1: 16.4%, quintile 5: 12.2%, p = 0.110). With a hospital mortality rate of 7.2% (5-10%) the MTL30 for OAR was 17.6%. In both EVAR and OAR, the length of stay correlated significantly with hospital mortality and MTL30. DISCUSSION: A clear relationship between hospital case volume and hospital mortality could not be shown in the AAA registry of the DIGG. The same was true for the MTL30. It remains to be seen whether the MTL30 offers an additional benefit compared to the recording of hospital mortality and inpatient length of stay as a quality parameter.

[SARS-CoV-2-How can and must medical personnel protect themselves?] / SARS-CoV-2 ­ Wie kann und muss sich medizinisches Personal schützen?

The SARS-CoV­2 pandemic represents a great challenge worldwide not only under the aspect of treatment but also of prevention. The infection curve could be flattened by the rapid implementation of simple distance and hygiene measures. In order to ensure current and future patient care in conjunction with protection of medical personnel working in the healthcare system during this pandemic, adequate protective equipment is essential. Routine care can only be resumed if there is sufficient and adequate personal protective equipment (PPE). If recommended hygiene protective measures including the necessary PPE are seriously taken into account both elective interventions and emergency care can be carried out without an increased risk of infection. This is very important in vascular surgery with a high proportion of urgent and emergency disease management.

Comparison of open and endovascular repair of juxtarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms.

BACKGROUND: This study compares the perioperative outcome in elective repair of the juxtarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA), depending upon whether patients received an open (OAR) or endovascular procedure (EVAR). METHODS: The database stems from the 2013-2017 AAA registry of the German Institute for Vascular Health Research (DIGG) of the German Society for Vascular Surgery and Vascular Medicine (DGG), with a total of 1603 juxtarenal AAAs. 786 patients (49.0%) were treated with an endovascular (EVAR) procedure, and 817 (51.0%) with an open (OAR) procedure. RESULTS: Patients receiving EVAR had a median age of 73 years and those receiving OAR a median age of 71 years (p < 0.001). The proportion of patients over 80 years of age was 17.0% for EVAR and 9.9% for OAR (p < 0.001). The proportion of women receiving EVAR (16.9%) was slightly lower than that receiving OAR (18.6%). Aneurysm diameter differed significantly (EVAR mean 57.80 mm, OAR 59.07 mm; p = 0.038). Preoperatively impaired renal function stages 3 to 5 were not significantly different (EVAR 12.5%, OAR 14.4%, p = 0.158). Postoperative complications were significantly less with EVAR (31%) than with OAR at 45.7% (p = 0.001). In regard to MACE (major adverse cardiac events = perioperative death, stroke, or myocardial infarction), there were no significant differences between EVAR (8.8%) and OAR (10.3%) (p = 0.191). Hospital mortality was only in trend lower with EVAR than with OAR (5.7% vs. 7.7%, respectively; p = 0.068). This held true for the hospital mortality in the group above 80 years of age as well. Inpatient stay was 9 (13.3) days for EVAR and 14 (18.8) days for OAR (p < 0.001). The hospital mortality for women receiving EVAR was 10.5%, and significantly higher (p = 0.008) than that for men (4.7%). The same held true for OAR (hospital mortality for women was 11.8%, for men 6.8%; p = 0.030). CONCLUSION: In terms of perioperative outcome, the endovascular procedure for treating juxtarenal AAA is more favorable than that documented for OAR. Further investigation is necessary to determine whether EVAR is comparable with OAR in the long term when treating juxtarenal AAA.

[The DIGG risk score : A risk predictive model of perioperative mortality after elective treatment of intact abdominal aortic aneurysms in the DIGG register]. / Der DIGG-Risikoscore : Ein Vorhersagemodell der perioperativen Sterblichkeit bei elektiver Versorgung des intakten Bauchaortenaneurysmas im DIGG-Register.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to develop a specific risk score for the aortic register of the German Institute for Vascular Health Care Research (DIGG) of the German Society for Vascular Surgery and Vascular Medicine (DGG) for the prediction of postoperative mortality in elective treatment of intact abdominal aortic aneurysms (iAAA). The score should also enable a risk-adjusted presentation of the register results in the near future. METHODS: The method of binary logistic regression analysis was used to calculate the model. The data from 10,404 patients were included in the analysis, of whom 7870 (75.6%) were treated by endovascular (EVAR) and 2534 (24.4%) by open (OR) aortic repair. It was examined which factors have an independent influence on hospital mortality and the effect size was determined as a score. RESULTS: For EVAR, the influencing factors with their effect sizes (score in brackets) were: age >85 years (2), female gender (2), juxtarenal AAA (5), maximum diameter >65 mm (2), diabetes mellitus (2), American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score >3 (2), cardiac comorbidities (3) and renal insufficiency stage >3 (5). For OR the factors were: age >80 years (2), female gender (2), juxtarenal AAA (2), ASA score >3 (3), previous myocardial infarction (2), renal comorbidities (3) and previous stroke (2). The estimated hospital mortality was calculated for the individual case from the sum of the risk factors (scores). The accuracy of the model (correlation between observed and expected results) was determined using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. An area under the curve (AUC) of 0.817 (confidence interval 0.789-0.844) demonstrated an excellent discrimination. In a validation group of 3831 patients, the good agreement between observed and calculated results was confirmed. CONCLUSION: The DIGG risk score can predict risk-adjusted hospital mortality after EVAR and OR of iAAA in the DIGG register. Improvements with respect to the prediction are desirable for OR and should be strived for by extending the model in the future.

Angioplasty in asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis vs. endarterectomy compared to best medical treatment: One-year interim results of SPACE-2.

BACKGROUND: Treatment of individuals with asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis is still handled controversially. Recommendations for treatment of asymptomatic carotid stenosis with carotid endarterectomy (CEA) are based on trials having recruited patients more than 15 years ago. Registry data indicate that advances in best medical treatment (BMT) may lead to a markedly decreasing risk of stroke in asymptomatic carotid stenosis. The aim of the SPACE-2 trial (ISRCTN78592017) was to compare the stroke preventive effects of BMT alone with that of BMT in combination with CEA or carotid artery stenting (CAS), respectively, in patients with asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis of ≥70% European Carotid Surgery Trial (ECST) criteria. METHODS: SPACE-2 is a randomized, controlled, multicenter, open study. A major secondary endpoint was the cumulative rate of any stroke (ischemic or hemorrhagic) or death from any cause within 30 days plus an ipsilateral ischemic stroke within one year of follow-up. Safety was assessed as the rate of any stroke and death from any cause within 30 days after CEA or CAS. Protocol changes had to be implemented. The results on the one-year period after treatment are reported. FINDINGS: It was planned to enroll 3550 patients. Due to low recruitment, the enrollment of patients was stopped prematurely after randomization of 513 patients in 36 centers to CEA (n = 203), CAS (n = 197), or BMT (n = 113). The one-year rate of the major secondary endpoint did not significantly differ between groups (CEA 2.5%, CAS 3.0%, BMT 0.9%; p = 0.530) as well as rates of any stroke (CEA 3.9%, CAS 4.1%, BMT 0.9%; p = 0.256) and all-cause mortality (CEA 2.5%, CAS 1.0%, BMT 3.5%; p = 0.304). About half of all strokes occurred in the peri-interventional period. Higher albeit statistically non-significant rates of restenosis occurred in the stenting group (CEA 2.0% vs. CAS 5.6%; p = 0.068) without evidence of increased stroke rates. INTERPRETATION: The low sample size of this prematurely stopped trial of 513 patients implies that its power is not sufficient to show that CEA or CAS is superior to a modern medical therapy (BMT) in the primary prevention of ischemic stroke in patients with an asymptomatic carotid stenosis up to one year after treatment. Also, no evidence for differences in safety between CAS and CEA during the first year after treatment could be derived. Follow-up will be performed up to five years. Data may be used for pooled analysis with ongoing trials.

Comparison of long-term results of carotid endarterectomy for asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis.

This article summarizes the current study situation on treatment of asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis and discusses the evidence situation in the literature. The 10-year results of the ACST study have shown that in comparison to conservative treatment, carotid endarterectomy (CEA) has retained a positive long-term effect on the reduction of all forms of stroke. All multicenter randomized controlled trials comparing CEA with carotid artery stenting (CAS) and, in particular the SAPHIRE and CAVATAS studies, have in common that despite a basic evidence level of Ib, the case numbers of asymptomatic patients are too small for a conclusive therapy recommendation. In the overall assessment of the CREST study the resulting difference in the questionable endpoint of "perioperative myocardial infarction" in favor of the CAS methods, could not be confirmed for exclusively asymptomatic patients. In the long-term course of the CREST study, both methods were classified as equivalent, even when the 4­year results of periprocedural and postprocedural stroke rates in the separate assessment of the asymptomatic study participants clearly favored the CEA. The results of the ACST-1 study showed an equivalent effect of both treatment methods with respect to all investigated endpoints; however, the unequal sizes of the groups in addition to the statistically insufficient case numbers put a question mark on the validity of the study results. The results of the ASCT-2 and CREST-2 studies are to be awaited, which also investigate the significance of "CEA versus CAS" (ASCT-2) and "CEA/CAS + best medical treatment (BMT) versus BMT alone" in only asymptomatic stenoses. The current S3 guidelines allow operative therapy to be considered in patients with a 60-99% asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis, because the risk of stroke is statistically significantly reduced.

Clinical significance of perioperative changes in ankle-brachial index with regard to extremity-related outcome in non-diabetic patients with critical limb ischemia.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the significance of perioperative changes in ankle-brachial index (ABI) with regard to extremity-related outcome in non-diabetic patients with critical limb ischemia (CLI) following revascularization. METHODS: The study represents a subanalysis of the multicentric Registry of First-line Treatment in Patients with CLI (CRITISCH). After exclusion of diabetic patients, conservative cases, and primary major amputation, 563 of 1200 CRITISCH patients (mean age 74 ± 10.7 years) were analyzed. This population was divided into two groups regarding perioperative ABI changes ∆ + 0.15 (Group 1) or ∆ - 0.15 (Group 2). Study endpoints were reintervention and major amputation during a mean follow-up of 14.6 ± 9 months. Logistic regression was performed in order to identify factors for ABI group affiliation. RESULTS: There were 279 patients in Group 1 (49.5%) and 284 in Group 2 (51.5%). ABI sensitivity and specificity regarding vessel patency were calculated to be 54 and 87%. A preoperative ABI ≤ 0.4 [odds ratio (OR) 7.7], patent vessels at discharge (OR 12.2), and secondary interventions (OR 2.4) were identified as factors for Group 1 affiliation. Contrariwise, previous revascularization (OR 0.6), a glomerular filtration rate ≤ 15 ml/min/1.73 m2 (OR 0.3), and TASC A lesions (OR 0.2) were associated with Group 2 affiliation. No statistical difference was found with regard to the need of reintervention. However, time to reintervention was significantly shorter in Group 2 compared to that in Group 1 (10.0 ± 9.5 months vs 12.1 ± 9.1 months; p = 0.005). Amputation rate in Group 2 was 14.4%, significantly higher compared to that in Group 1 (6.0%; p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Failure of perioperative ABI improvement is associated with a higher probability for amputation and should be valued as prognostic factor in non-diabetic patients with CLI. Patients with no/marginal improvement in ABI after revascularization require close follow-up monitoring and may benefit from early reintervention.

[Postoperative blood pressure alterations after carotid endarterectomy : Implications of different reconstruction methods]. / Postoperative Blutdruckschwankungen nach Karotisendarteriektomie : Implikationen der verschiedenen Rekonstruktionstechniken.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative blood pressure alterations after carotid endarterectomy (CEA) are associated with an increased risk of morbidity and mortality. OBJECTIVE: To outline the influence of the two commonly used surgical reconstruction techniques, conventional CEA with patch plasty (C-CEA) and eversion CEA (E-CEA), as well as the innovative carotid sinus-preserving eversion CEA (SP-E-CEA) technique on postoperative hemodynamics, taking the current scientific knowledge into consideration. METHODS: Assessment of the current clinical and scientific evidence on each operative technique found in the PubMed (NLM) database ranging from 1974 to 2017, excluding case reports. RESULTS: A total of 34 relevant papers as well as 1 meta-analysis, which scientifically dealt with the described topic were identified. The results of the studies and the meta-analysis showed that E­CEA correlates with an impairment of local baroreceptor functions as well as with an elevated need for vasodilators in the early postoperative phase, whereas C­CEA and SP-E-CEA seem to have a more favorable effect on the postoperative blood pressure. CONCLUSION: The CEA technique influences the postoperative blood pressure regulation, irrespective of the operative technique used. Accordingly, close blood pressure monitoring is recommended at least during the postoperative hospital stay. Further studies are mandatory to evaluate the importance of SP-E-CEA as an alternative to the classical E­CEA.

Perioperative cerebrospinal fluid drainage for the prevention of spinal ischemia after endovascular aortic repair.

Endovascular treatment of thoracic and thoracoabdominal aortic diseases is accompanied by a risk of spinal ischemia in 1-19% of patients, depending on the entity and extent of the disease. The use of perioperative drainage of cerebrospinal fluid is one of the invasive measures to reduce the occurrence of this severe complication. This article reviews the incidence of spinal ischemia, its risk factors, the evidence for carrying out cerebrospinal fluid drainage and its modern use by means of an automated, pressure controlled system (LiquoGuard®7).

Endovascular treatment of genetically linked aortic diseases.

BACKGROUND: The most important structural proteins of the vascular wall are collagen and elastin. Genetically linked connective tissue diseases lead to degeneration, aneurysm formation and spontaneous dissection or rupture of arteries. The most well-known are Marfan syndrome, vascular Ehlers-Danlos syndrome (type IV), Loeys-Dietz syndrome and familial aortic aneurysms and dissections. OBJECTIVE: This review article addresses the current status of endovascular treatment options for important connective tissue diseases. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Evaluation of currently available randomized studies and registry data. RESULTS: The treatment of choice for patients that are mostly affected at a young age is primarily conservative or open repair. There is only limited evidence for endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) of abdominal aneurysms or thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR). CONCLUSION: The progression of the disease with dilatation leads to secondary endoleaks and high reintervention rates with uncertain long-term results. For this reason, there is currently consensus that EVAR and TEVAR should be limited to justified exceptional cases and emergency situations in patients with genetically linked aortic diseases.

Elevated Wall Shear Stress in Aortic Type B Dissection May Relate to Retrograde Aortic Type A Dissection: A Computational Fluid Dynamics Pilot Study.

OBJECTIVE: Retrograde aortic type A dissection (RTAD) is a known complication in patients with aortic type B dissection. The purpose of this computational fluid dynamics (CFD) study was to identify haemodynamic risk factors for the occurrence of RTAD. METHODS: Computed tomographic angiography (CTA) images of 10 patients with type B dissections, who subsequently developed a RTAD, were retrospectively analysed together with patients constituting a control group (n = 10) where no further vascular events after the initial type B dissection occurred. CFD simulations were conducted based on 3D surface models of the aortic lumen derived from CTA datasets. For both groups, pressures, velocity magnitudes and wall shear stress (WSS) were compared at the site of the future RTAD entry tear and the surrounding aortic wall. RESULTS: WSS at the site of the future entry tear was significantly elevated compared with the surrounding wall (15.10 Pa vs. 5.15 Pa, p < .001) and was significantly higher in the RTAD group than in the control group (6.05 Pa, p < .002). Pressures and velocity magnitudes were not significantly elevated at the entry tear (3825.8 Pa, 0.63 m/s) compared with the aortic arch (3549.8 Pa, 0.50 m/s) or control group (3501.7 Pa, 0.62 m/s). CONCLUSIONS: Increased WSS accompanies the occurrence of RTAD. The results merit the design for a prospective study to confirm whether WSS is a risk factor for the occurrence of RTAD.