Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 7 de 7
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
5.
Radiat Environ Biophys ; 58(2): 295-302, 2019 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30799523

ABSTRACT

Currently, in the context of radiology, irradiation-induced and other genotoxic effects are determined by visualizing DSB-induced DNA repair through γ-H2AX immunofluorescence and direct counting of the foci by epifluorescence microscopy. This procedure, however, neglects the 3D nature of the nucleus. The aim of our study was to use confocal microscopy and 3D reconstructed images to improve documentation and analysis of γ-H2AX fluorescence signals after diagnostic examinations. Confluent, non-dividing MRC-5 lung fibroblasts were irradiated in vitro with a Cs-137 source and exposed to radiation doses up to 1000 mGy before fixation and staining with an antibody recognizing the phosphorylated histone variant γ-H2AX. The 3D distribution of γ-H2AX foci was visualized using confocal laser scanning microscopy. 3D reconstruction of the optical slices and γ-H2AX foci counting were performed using Imaris Image Analysis software. In parallel, γ-H2AX foci were counted visually by epifluorescence microscopy. In addition, whole blood was exposed ex vivo to the radiation doses from 200 to 1600 mGy. White blood cells (WBCs) were isolated and stained for γ-H2AX. In fibroblasts, epifluorescence microscopy alone visualized the entirety of fluorescence signals as integral, without correct demarcation of single foci, and at 1000 mGy yielded on average 11.1 foci by manual counting of 2D images in comparison to 36.1 foci with confocal microscopy and 3D reconstruction (p < 0.001). The procedure can also be applied for studies on WBCs. In contrast to epifluorescence microscopy, confocal microscopy and 3D reconstruction enables an improved identification of DSB-induced γ-H2AX foci, allowing for an unbiased, ameliorated quantification.


Subject(s)
Cesium Radioisotopes , DNA Breaks, Double-Stranded , Fibroblasts/radiation effects , Histones/metabolism , Cell Line , Fibroblasts/metabolism , Fluorescence , Humans , Leukocytes/metabolism , Leukocytes/radiation effects , Microscopy, Confocal , Microscopy, Fluorescence
6.
Contrib Nephrol ; 184: 59-74, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25676292

ABSTRACT

In hemodialysis patients, radiographic imaging with iodinated contrast medium (ICM) application plays a central role in the diagnosis and/or follow-up of disease-related conditions. Therefore, safety aspects concerning ICM administration and radiation exposure have a great impact on this group of patients. Current hardware and software improvements including the design and synthesis of modern contrast compounds allow the use of very small amounts of ICM in concert with low radiation exposure. Undesirable ICM side effects are divided into type A (predictable reactions such as heat feeling, headache, and contrast-induced acute kidney injury, for example) and type B (nonpredictable or hypersensitivity) reactions; this chapter deals with the latter. The first onset cannot be prevented. To prevent hypersensitivity upon reexposure of ICM, an allergological workup is recommended. If this is not possible and ICM is necessary, the patient should receive a premedication (H1 antihistamine with or without corticosteroids). Current imaging hardware and software improvements (e.g. such as additional filtration of the X-ray beam) allow the use of very small amount of ICM and small X-ray doses. Proper communication among the team involved in the treatment of a patient may allow to apply imaging protocols and efficient imaging strategies limiting radiation exposure to a minimum. Practical recommendations will guide the reader how to use radiation and ICM efficiently to improve both patient and staff safety.


Subject(s)
Acute Kidney Injury/prevention & control , Contrast Media/adverse effects , Occupational Health , Patient Safety , Physicians , Radiation Injuries/prevention & control , Radiation, Ionizing , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/diagnostic imaging , Acute Kidney Injury/etiology , Adrenal Cortex Hormones/therapeutic use , Histamine H1 Antagonists, Non-Sedating/therapeutic use , Humans , Hypersensitivity/etiology , Hypersensitivity/prevention & control , Iodine/adverse effects , Occupational Injuries/etiology , Occupational Injuries/prevention & control , Radiation Injuries/etiology , Radiation Protection , Radiography , Renal Dialysis , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/therapy
7.
Chem Soc Rev ; 41(11): 4306-34, 2012 Jun 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22481569

ABSTRACT

In this review an overview about biological applications of magnetic colloidal nanoparticles will be given, which comprises their synthesis, characterization, and in vitro and in vivo applications. The potential future role of magnetic nanoparticles compared to other functional nanoparticles will be discussed by highlighting the possibility of integration with other nanostructures and with existing biotechnology as well as by pointing out the specific properties of magnetic colloids. Current limitations in the fabrication process and issues related with the outcome of the particles in the body will be also pointed out in order to address the remaining challenges for an extended application of magnetic nanoparticles in medicine.


Subject(s)
Magnetite Nanoparticles/chemistry , Animals , Bacteria/isolation & purification , Biosensing Techniques , Contrast Media/chemistry , DNA/chemistry , DNA/metabolism , Drug Carriers/chemistry , Ferrosoferric Oxide/chemistry , Humans , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Magnetite Nanoparticles/toxicity , Neoplasms/diagnosis , Proteins/chemistry , Proteins/metabolism
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...