Computed tomography for detection of septic foci: Retrospective analysis of patients presenting to the emergency department.

OBJECTIVE: Sepsis is defined as organ dysfunction due to severe infection. Septic patients face a significant mortality risk. Thus, timely recognition with prompt focus identification and control are essential. This study aims to determine the current role of computed tomography (CT) in the diagnostic workup of septic patients. METHODS: We retrospectively identified 357 patients in the emergency department (ED) of a large university center with suspected sepsis in a two-year period. A total of 132 patients underwent CT scanning within 72 h of admission. Patients were characterized by clinical and laboratory findings. CT reports were categorized and matched with clinical data. RESULTS: Of 357 ED patients with suspected sepsis, 37.0% (132/357) underwent CT imaging within 72 h. The most commonly identified septic foci in CT were chest 38.6% (49/127), abdomen 22.0% (28/127) and genitourinary tract 20.5% (26/127) in descending order. The focus detection rate was 76.5% per patient with a concurrent number-needed-to-scan of 1.31. Contrast medium administration in CT did not improve focus detection rate (p = 0.631) or diagnostic confidence in this patient population (p = 0.432). CT had a positive predictive value of 81.82% (CI 76.31 to 86.28%) in predicting the focus of the discharge diagnosis. Follow-up imaging in patients with unclear focus reveals a new focus in 39.5% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: Our investigation of the role of CT in ED patients with suspected sepsis indicated a high positive predictive value for CT with regard to the discharge diagnosis. Repeat imaging may help identify further septic foci in a subgroup with persistently unclear focus. Use of contrast medium seems less relevant for focus detection than expected, as it did not increase diagnostic confidence.

Evaluation of computed tomography in patients with atypical angina or chest pain clinically referred for invasive coronary angiography: randomised controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE:  To evaluate whether invasive coronary angiography or computed tomography (CT) should be performed in patients clinically referred for coronary angiography with an intermediate probability of coronary artery disease. DESIGN:  Prospective randomised single centre trial. SETTING:  University hospital in Germany. PARTICIPANTS:  340 patients with suspected coronary artery disease and a clinical indication for coronary angiography on the basis of atypical angina or chest pain. INTERVENTIONS:  168 patients were randomised to CT and 172 to coronary angiography. After randomisation one patient declined CT and 10 patients declined coronary angiography, leaving 167 patients (88 women) and 162 patients (78 women) for analysis. Allocation could not be blinded, but blinded independent investigators assessed outcomes. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE:  The primary outcome measure was major procedural complications within 48 hours of the last procedure related to CT or angiography. RESULTS:  Cardiac CT reduced the need for coronary angiography from 100% to 14% (95% confidence interval 9% to 20%, P<0.001) and was associated with a significantly greater diagnostic yield from coronary angiography: 75% (53% to 90%) v 15% (10% to 22%), P<0.001. Major procedural complications were uncommon (0.3%) and similar across groups. Minor procedural complications were less common in the CT group than in the coronary angiography group: 3.6% (1% to 8%) v 10.5% (6% to 16%), P=0.014. CT shortened the median length of stay in the angiography group from 52.9 hours (interquartile range 49.5-76.4 hours) to 30.0 hours (3.5-77.3 hours, P<0.001). Overall median exposure to radiation was similar between the CT and angiography groups: 5.0 mSv (interquartile range 4.2-8.7 mSv) v 6.4 mSv (3.4-10.7 mSv), P=0.45. After a median follow-up of 3.3 years, major adverse cardiovascular events had occurred in seven of 167 patients in the CT group (4.2%) and six of 162 (3.7%) in the coronary angiography group (adjusted hazard ratio 0.90, 95% confidence interval 0.30 to 2.69, P=0.86). 79% of patients stated that they would prefer CT for subsequent testing. The study was conducted at a University hospital in Germany and thus the performance of CT may be different in routine clinical practice. The prevalence was lower than expected, resulting in an underpowered study for the predefined primary outcome. CONCLUSIONS:  CT increased the diagnostic yield and was a safe gatekeeper for coronary angiography with no increase in long term events. The length of stay was shortened by 22.9 hours with CT, and patients preferred non-invasive testing.Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00844220.

Sildenafil is well tolerated by erectile dysfunction patients taking antihypertensive medications, including those on multidrug regimens.

Erectile dysfunction occurs extensively among patients with arterial hypertension. We investigated the safety of sildenafil for patients with and without antihypertensive medication. Our study included data from 35 double-blind, placebo-controlled, and randomized investigations, with a total of 8115 patients. The term of therapy was between 6 weeks and 6 months, for both the sildenafil group (5-200 mg, n=4819) as well as the placebo group (n=3296). We studied the adverse events in the men who received 1 or more hypertensives (n=2388), and in those who took no antihypertensive medication (n=5727). Our findings disclosed equal frequency of adverse events in both groups, without influence by the number of different antihypertensives administered. The occurrence of AEs associated with blood pressure was slight, and was comparable between the individual groups. These results support the conclusion that sildenafil is also well tolerated by patients taking one or more antihypertensives. Patients being treated with alpha blockers should be stable on this therapy in order to minimize the possibility of orthostatic hypotension. An initial dose of 25 mg should furthermore be considered for these patients.

Role of immunoglobulin G3 subclass in dilated cardiomyopathy: results from protein A immunoadsorption.

BACKGROUND: Immunoadsorption (IA) by anti-immunoglobulin G (anti-IgG) columns that effectively eliminates total IgG, including IgG3 subclass, represents an additional therapeutic approach in dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM). A recent study revealed that IA with protein A columns does not effectively remove IgG3 and does not induce hemodynamic improvement in DCM. METHODS: Eighteen patients with DCM (left ventricular ejection fraction < or =30%) were included in this case-control study. In all patients, IA with protein A was performed in 4 courses, at 1-month intervals until month 3. Nine patients underwent protein A IA with an improved treatment regimen for IgG3 elimination. Data of these patients were compared retrospectively to existing findings for 9 comparable patients treated by protein A IA with ineffective IgG3 reduction. RESULTS: In both groups, IA induced a comparable reduction of the total IgG level. However, reduction of the IgG3 level was different in the 2 groups (P < .001). Hemodynamics did not significantly change throughout the 3 months in the group with ineffective IgG3 reduction. In contrast, the group with improved IgG3 reduction demonstrated during the first IA course an increase in cardiac index from 2.2 +/- 0.1 to 2.8 +/- 0.2 L min(-1) m(-2) (P < .05). After 3 months before the last IA course, cardiac index was 2.2 +/- 0.1 L min(-1) m(-2) in the group with ineffective IgG3 elimination and 2.8 +/- 0.2 L min(-1) m(-2) in the group with improved IgG3 reduction (P < .01). In the group with ineffective IgG3 reduction, left ventricular ejection fraction increased after 3 months from 21.6 +/- 2% to 24.4 +/- 2% (NS), and from 24.3 +/- 2 to 34.7 +/- 4% in the group with improved IgG3 reduction (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: Autoantibodies belonging to IgG3 may play an important role in cardiac dysfunction of patients with DCM. Protein A IA in conjunction with an improved treatment regimen for IgG3 elimination induces hemodynamic benefit in patients suffering from DCM.

Potential role of autoantibodies belonging to the immunoglobulin G-3 subclass in cardiac dysfunction among patients with dilated cardiomyopathy.

BACKGROUND: Immunoadsorption capable of removing circulating autoantibodies represents an additional therapeutic approach in dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM). The role played by autoantibodies belonging to the immunoglobulin (Ig) subclass G-3 in cardiac dysfunction remains to be elucidated. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients with DCM (left ventricular ejection fraction <30%) participated in this case-control study. Nine patients underwent immunoadsorption with protein A (low affinity to IgG-3), and 9 patients were treated with anti-IgG, which removes all IgG subclasses. Immunoadsorption was performed in 4 courses at 1-month intervals until month 3. In the 2 groups, immunoadsorption induced comparable reduction of total IgG (>80%). IgG-3 was effectively eliminated only by anti-IgG adsorption (eg, during the first immunoadsorption course; protein A, -37+/-4%; anti-IgG, -89+/-3%; P<0.001 versus protein A). The beta1-receptor autoantibody was effectively reduced only by anti-IgG (P<0.01 versus protein A). Hemodynamics did not change in the protein A group. In the anti-IgG group during the first immunoadsorption course, cardiac index increased from 2.3+/-0.1 to 3.0+/-0.1 L x min(-1) x m(-2) (P<0.01 versus protein A). After 3 months, before the last immunoadsorption course, cardiac index was 2.2+/-0.1 L x min(-1) x m(-2) in the protein A group and 3.0+/-0.2 L x min(-1) x m(-2) in the anti-IgG group (P<0.01 versus protein A). Left ventricular ejection fraction increased only in the anti-IgG group (P<0.05 versus protein A). CONCLUSIONS: Autoantibodies belonging to IgG-3 may play an important role in cardiac dysfunction of DCM. The removal of antibodies of the IgG-3 subclass may represent an essential mechanism of immunoadsorption in DCM.