ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate short term outcomes related to the use of the Zenith TX2 Dissection Endovascular Graft (ZDEG) and the Zenith Dissection Bare stent (ZDES) for the treatment of Stanford type B aortic dissections. METHODS: This retrospective multicenter case cohort study collated data from 10 European institutions for patients with both complicated and uncomplicated type B aortic dissection treated with ZDEG and ZDES between 2011 and 2018. The primary end point was mortality at 30 and 90 days. Secondary end points included complications related to TEVAR, such as, type Ia endoleak, stroke, paraparesis, paraplegia, and retrograde type A dissection (RTAD). Statistical analysis was carried out using the t test, or one-way analysis of variance and the χ2 or Fisher exact tests. RESULTS: We treated 120 patients (87 male; mean age, 62.7 ± 12.2years) either in the acute 76 (63.3%), subacute 16 (13.3%), or chronic 28 (23.3%) phase. Seven patients (5.8%) died within 30 days after the index procedure and two (1.7%) between 30 and 90 days. There was one instance of postoperative RTAD in a patient treated for rupture. Stroke and paraplegia occurred in three (2.5%) and five (4.2%), patients, respectively. Eight patients (6.7%) had a type Ia endoleak in the perioperative period. There were no instances of paraplegia, no permanent dialysis, and no requirement for adjunctive superior mesenteric or celiac artery stenting in the 33 patients (27.5%) who were treated by concurrent placement of ZDES distal to the ZDEG. The length and distal oversizing of ZDEG components used was less in this group. CONCLUSIONS: The present series demonstrates a low (<1%) RTAD rate and favorable morbidity and mortality. The lower rate of paraplegia, dialysis, and visceral artery stenting in the cohort that had adjunctive use of ZDES is compelling and merits further assessment.
Subject(s)
Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracic/surgery , Aortic Dissection/surgery , Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation/instrumentation , Blood Vessel Prosthesis , Endovascular Procedures/instrumentation , Stents , Aged , Aortic Dissection/diagnostic imaging , Aortic Dissection/mortality , Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracic/diagnostic imaging , Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracic/mortality , Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation/adverse effects , Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation/mortality , Endovascular Procedures/adverse effects , Endovascular Procedures/mortality , Europe , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Postoperative Complications/mortality , Prosthesis Design , Retrospective Studies , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Time Factors , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Recent years have seen the introduction of catheter-based aortic valve substitution with stent valves to treat aortic valve stenosis in patients who were deemed inoperable via conventional open heart surgery. We here report our initial experience. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Register-based study with prospective registration of prespecified parameters. A total of 26 patients were treated with an aortic stent valve, 12 via transfemoral (TFA-AVI) and 14 via transapical (TAP-AVI) access. In the TFA-AVI group, 75% were women and the average age was 85 4.5 years; in the TAP-AVI group, 71% were women and the average age was 79 8.4 years. RESULTS: In the TFA-AVI group, successful stent valve implantation was performed in 9/12 (75%) and TAP-AVI in 13/14 (93%) patients. Mortality after 30 days was 25% in the TFA-AVI and 7% in the TAP-AVI group. The aortic valve area increased from 0.6 0.13 cm(2) to 1.6 0.39 (2) in the TFA-AVI group and from 0.7 0.2 (2) to 1.6 0.37 (2) in the TAP-AVI group. 91% of patients showed clinical improvement after treatment. CONCLUSION: Transcatheter aortic valve implantation of conventional unresectable patients requires close cooperation between different specialities. The treatment seems to be a realistic alternative to medical treatment for inoperable patients and may even be used in operable high-risk patients.
