ABSTRACT
Chromatin immunoprecipitation followed by sequencing (ChIP-seq) is a method used to profile protein-DNA interactions genome-wide. Restriction Enzyme-based Labeling of Chromatin in Situ (RELACS) is a recently developed ChIP-seq protocol that deploys a chromatin barcoding strategy to enable standardized and high-throughput generation of ChIP-seq data. The manual implementation of RELACS is constrained by human processivity in both data generation and data analysis. To overcome these limitations, we have developed AutoRELACS, an automated implementation of the RELACS protocol using the liquid handler Biomek i7 workstation. We match the unprecedented processivity in data generation allowed by AutoRELACS with the automated computation pipelines offered by snakePipes. In doing so, we build a continuous workflow that streamlines epigenetic profiling, from sample collection to biological interpretation. Here, we show that AutoRELACS successfully automates chromatin barcode integration, and is able to generate high-quality ChIP-seq data comparable with the standards of the manual protocol, also for limited amounts of biological samples.
Subject(s)
Chromatin Immunoprecipitation/methods , Sequence Analysis, DNA/methods , Automation , Cell CountABSTRACT
MOTIVATION: This paper presents Parkour, a software package for sample processing and quality management of next generation sequencing data and samples. RESULTS: Starting with user requests, Parkour allows tracking and assessing samples based on predefined quality criteria through different stages of the sample preparation workflow. Ideally suited for academic core laboratories, the software aims to maximize efficiency and reduce turnaround time by intelligent sample grouping and a clear assignment of staff to work units. Tools for automated invoicing, interactive statistics on facility usage and simple report generation minimize administrative tasks. Provided as a web application, Parkour is a convenient tool for both deep sequencing service users and laboratory personal. A set of web APIs allow coordinated information sharing with local and remote bioinformaticians. The flexible structure allows workflow customization and simple addition of new features as well as the expansion to other domains. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The code and documentation are available at https://github.com/maxplanck-ie/parkour. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Subject(s)
High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing , Software , Humans , Laboratories , WorkflowABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To compare the effect of two sequential hormone replacement regimens differing in the dose of levonorgestrel on climacteric symptoms, bleeding pattern and lipid metabolism in postmenopausal women. STUDY DESIGN: In a multicentre, randomized, double-blind, active-treatment-controlled study, 210 postmenopausal women were assessed at the end of treatment cycles 3 and 6. The high-levonorgestrel group was treated with 2 mg estradiol valerate (days 1-21) sequentially combined with 0.25 mg levonorgestrel (days 12-21). The low-levonorgestrel group received the same estrogen regimen (2 mg estradiol valerate, days 1-21), but levonorgestrel was administered sequentially in a dose of 0.15 mg during the last 12 days of the cycle (days 10-21). Statistical analysis by Student's t-test for dependent variables (measured values versus baseline) and independent variables (differences between groups), and the composite t-test method for comparison of both regimens with respect to efficacy, was performed. RESULTS: Both groups were statistically comparable. The trial was completed by 137 subjects. Protocol violations occurred in 38 cases. Thirty-five subjects dropped out during the study, 21 of them because of adverse events. Both treatments were equally effective in the treatment of climacteric complaints. There were no clinically significant changes in body weight, blood pressure, haematological tests, and parameters of clinical chemistry. There was a tendency towards a reduction in bleeding intensity in both groups in the second half of the treatment period. The treatment for six cycles with both regimens significantly (P < 0.05) decreased plasma concentrations of triglycerides (significant in the low-levonorgestrel group only), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein-3-cholesterol, lipoprotein(a) and apolipoprotein A1. In parallel, the serum concentration of total cholesterol increased significantly in both treatment groups, whereas low-density lipoprotein cholesterol increased significantly in the high-levonorgestrel group only. The changes in high-density lipoprotein-2-cholesterol, and apolipoprotein B did not reach statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: It can be concluded that both sequential combined oral hormone replacement therapy (HRT) regimens were equivalent with respect to efficacy and tolerability in the treatment of women with climacteric complaints. The preparation with the lower dose of progestin showed a tendency towards a less unfavourable influence on the lipid profile.