Coordination chemistry of a new rigid, hexadentate bispidine-based bis(amine)tetrakis(pyridine) ligand.

The hexadentate bispidine-based ligand 2,4-bis(2-pyridyl)-3,7-bis(2-methylenepyridine)-3,7-diazabicyclo[3.3.1]nonane-9-on-1,5-bis(carbonic acid methyl ester), L(6m), with four pyridine and two tertiary amine donors, based on a very rigid diazaadamantane-derived backbone, is coordinated to a range of metal ions. On the basis of experimental and computed structural data, the ligand is predicted to form very stable complexes. Force field calculations indicate that short metal-donor distances lead to a buildup of strain in the ligand; that is, the coordination of large metal ions is preferred. This is confirmed by experimentally determined stability constants, which indicate that, in general, stabilities comparable to those with macrocyclic ligands are obtained with the relative order Cu(2+) > Zn(2+) >> Ni(2+) < Co(2+), which is not the typical Irving-Williams behavior. The preference for large M-N distances also emerges from relatively high redox potentials (the higher oxidation states, that is, the smaller metal ions, are destabilized) and from relatively weak ligand fields (dd-transition, high-spin electronic ground states). The potentiometric titrations confirm the efficient encapsulation of the metal ions since only 1:1 complexes are observed, and, over a large pH range, ML is generally the only species present in solution.

Copper-bispidine coordination chemistry: syntheses, structures, solution properties, and oxygenation reactivity.

Copper(I) and copper(II) complexes of two mononucleating and four dinucleating tetradentate ligands with a bispidine backbone (2,4-substituted (2-pyridyl or 4-methyl-2-pyridyl) 3,7-diazabicyclo[3.3.1]nonanone) have been prepared and analyzed structurally, spectroscopically, and electrochemically. The structures of the copper chromophores are square pyramidal, except for two copper(I) compounds which are four-coordinate with one noncoordinated pyridine. The other copper(I) structures have the two pyridine donors, the co-ligand (NCCH(3)), and one of the tertiary amines (N3) in-plane with the copper center and the other amine (N7) coordinated axially (Cu-N3 > Cu-N7, approximately 2.25 A vs 2.20 A). The copper(II) compounds with pyridine donors have a similar structure, but the axial amine has a weaker bond to the copper(II) center (Cu-N3 < Cu-N7, approximately 2.03 A vs 2.30 A). The structures with methylated pyridine donors are also square pyramidal with the co-ligands (Cl(-) or NCCH(3)) in-plane. With NCCH(3) the same structural type as for the other copper(II) complexes is observed, and with the bulkier Cl(-) the co-ligand is trans to N7, leading to a square pyramidal structure with the pyridine donors rotated out of the basal plane and only a small difference between axial and in-plane amines (2.15, 2.12 A). These structural differences, enforced by the rigid bispidine backbone, lead to large variations in spectroscopic and electrochemical properties and reactivities. Oxygenation of the copper(I) complexes with pyridine-substituted bispidine ligands leads to relatively stable mu-peroxo-dicopper(II) complexes; with a preorganization of the dicopper chromophores, by linking the two donor sets, these peroxo compounds are stable at room temperature for up to 1 h. The stabilization of the peroxo complexes is to a large extent attributed to the square pyramidal coordination geometry with the substrate bound in the basal plane, a structural motif enforced by the rigid bispidine backbone. The stabilities and structural properties are also seen to correlate with the spectroscopic (UV-vis and Raman) and electrochemical properties.

Preparation, Structure, and Electronic Properties of a Low-Spin Iron(II) Hexaamine Compound.

[Fe(trans-diammac)](2+) (trans-diammac) = exo-6,13-diamino-6,13-dimethyl-1,4,8,11-tetraazatetradecane) is one of the very few fully characterized examples of a low-spin iron(II) compound with saturated amine ligands. The crystal structure analysis (monoclinic, P2(1)/c; a = 9.547(8), b = 14.631(13), c = 16.91(2) Å; beta = 98.92(7) degrees; Z = 4) defines the iron(II) coordination geometry as distorted octahedral with very short in-plane Fe-N distances (average of 2.01 Å) to the secondary amines of the macrocyclic ligand and slightly longer distances to the pendant primary amine donors (2.03 Å); there is a considerable tilt of the vector involving the axial donors with respect to the plane defined by the secondary amines and the metal center (theta = 11.5 degrees ). The metal-donor distances are shorter than those for other low-spin iron(II) hexaamines, and consequently, the redox potential (Fe(3+/2+)) is very small (0.45 V vs SHE) and the ligand field splitting is very large (Dq = 1785 cm(-)(1)). The structural, magnetic, and spectroscopic properties are discussed on the basis of the experimental data in comparison with model studies.