Leprosy surveillance study in a highly endemic Brazilian area using leprosy specific serologic tests and IFNγ whole blood assay.

This surveillance study evaluated leprosy-serologic tests and the IFNγ whole-blood-assay/WBA as adjunct diagnostic tools. Previously diagnosed leprosy index cases, intradomiciliary, peridomiciliary contacts from a Brazilian endemic area were enrolled during domiciliary visits. Physical evaluation was performed by trained nurses and leprosy diagnosis confirmed by expert dermatologist. ELISA detected IgM anti-PGL-I, IgG anti-LID-1, and IgM/IgG anti-ND-O-LID antibodies. Heparinized WBA plasma stimulated with LID-1, 46f + LID-1, ML0276 + LID-1 (24 h, 37 °C, 5% CO2) was tested for human IFNγ (QuantiFERON®-TB Gold/QFT-G; Qiagen). The survey included 1731 participants: 44 leprosy index cases, 64 intradomiciliary, 1623 peridomiciliary contacts. Women represented 57.7%, median age was 32 years, 72.2% had BCG scar. Leprosy prevalence was higher in intradomiciliary (8.57%) versus peridomiciliary contacts (0.67%), p < 0.001. Among 23 suspects, five leprosy cases were confirmed: 4 multibacillary/MB and 1 paucibacillary/PB. Leprosy incidence was 0.30%: 1.56% in intradomiciliary versus 0.25% in peridomiciliary (p = 0.028). Seropositivity rates were 1.9% to PGL-I, 4.9% to LID-1, and 1.0% to ND-O-LID. LID-1 positivity was higher in all groups; incident cases were LID-1 seropositive. ND-O-LID positivity was higher in intra- versus peridomiciliary contacts (p = 0.022). IFNγ WBA (40 index cases, 19 suspects, 35 intradomiciliary, 74 peridomiciliary contacts) showed higher LID-1/WBA positivity in peridomiciliary contacts (p > 0.05); significant differences among groups were seen with 46f + LID-1 but 0276 + LID-1 induced higher IFNγ levels. Incident cases were LID-1 seropositive, while IFNγ-WBA had marginal diagnostic application. As seropositivity indicates exposed individuals at higher risk of disease development, the utility of serologic screening for surveillance and prophylactic measures remains to be demonstrated.

Prevalence and Diagnosis of Latent Tuberculosis Infection in Young Children in the Absence of a Gold Standard.

INTRODUCTION: For adequate disease control the World Health Organization has proposed the diagnosis and treatment of latent tuberculous infection (LTBI) in groups of risk of developing the disease such as children. There is no gold standard (GS) test for the diagnosis of LTBI. The objective of this study was to estimate the prevalence of LTBI in young children in contact with a household case of tuberculosis (TB-HCC) and determine the accuracy and precision of the Tuberculin Skin Test (TST) and QuantiFERON-TB Gold in-tube (QFT) used in the absence of a GS. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study in children up to 6 years of age in Manaus/Brazil during the years 2009-2010. All the children had been vaccinated with the BCG and were classified into two groups according to the presence of a TB-HCC or no known contact with tuberculosis (TB). The variables studied were: the TST and QFT results and the intensity and length of exposure to the index tuberculosis case. We used the latent class model to determine the prevalence of LTBI and the accuracy of the tests. RESULTS: Fifty percent of the children with TB-HCC had LTBI, with the prevalence depending on the intensity and length of exposure to the index case. The sensitivity and specificity of TST were 73% [95% confidence interval (CI): 53-91] and 97% (95%CI: 89-100), respectively, versus 53% (95%CI: 41-66) and 81% (95%CI:71-90) for QFT. The positive predictive value of TST in children with TB-HCC was 91% (95%CI: 61-99), being 74% for QFT (95%CI: 47-95). CONCLUSIONS: This is one of the first studies to estimate the prevalence of LTBI in children and the parameters of the main diagnostic tests using a latent class model. Our results suggest that children in contact with an index case have a high risk of infection. The accuracy and the predictive value of the two tests did not significantly differ. Combined use of the two tests showed scarce improvement in the diagnosis of LTBI.

Humoral and cellular immune reactivity to recombinant M. leprae antigens in HLA-Typed leprosy patients and healthy controls

In our search for Mycobacterium leprae antigens that might specifically induce immunity or immunopathology, we have tested both humoral and cellular immune reactivity against purified recombinant M. leprae antigens in 29 paucibacillary (PB), 26 multibacillary (MB) leprosy patients, and 47 matched healthy contacts. The following M. leprae antigens were tested: 2L-1 (65L-1, GroEl-1), 2L-2 (65L-2, GroEl-2), 4L (SoDA), 43L, 10L (B) and 25L (Sra). The individuals were also typed for HLAD-RB1 and DQB1 in order to see whether leprosy status and/or immune reactivity to these antigens might be associated with certain HLA types. We also tested sera from another 48 patients before, during and after multidrug therapy (MDT) to study the relationship between antibody reactivity to recombinant M. leprae antigens and MDT. Antibody titers to the four recombinant M. leprae antigens tested and to D-BSA were higher in MB patients compared to PB patients and healthy controls, and declined with treatment. From a diagnostic or monitoring point of view none of the recombinant antigens seemed to be an improvement over D-BSA, mainly due to the lower sensitivity. IgG subclasses were measured in positive sera of untreated patients. These were mainly of the IgG1 and IgG3 subclasses, but subclass diversity was also observed and antigen dependent: all four subclasses could be detected against 10L (B), only IgG1 and IgG3 against 43L and only IgG1 against 25L and 2L-1. Cellular immune reactivity against the purified recombinant M. leprae antigens was measured in a lymphocyte stimulation test (LST). As for M. leprae, there was an inverse correlation between antibody and T-cell reactivity. However, the number of LST responders to recombinant antigens was much lower than to M. leprae. The 43L antigen was recognized most often (19%-24% of individuals tested) and more often than the 10L (B) antigen (10%-12%). No clear correlation was observed with leprosy type or protection and, in general, M. leprae nonresponders were also negative with recombinant antigens. Finally, we confirmed that HLA-DRB1*02 is associated with leprosy in this population, and we observed an association between DQB1*0601 and lepromatous leprosy. The number of positive individuals was too small to allow a meaningful analysis of the relationship between HLA type and immune reactivity. Although these data do not allow a conclusion as to one of these purified recombinant antigens being either protection or disease related, the antigen-dependent IgG subclass diversity warrants further study on antigen-specific qualitative differences in immune reactivity that may be relevant for the outcome of an infection with M. leprae.