Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Front Psychol ; 13: 892216, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36275227

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Especially in the chronic phase, individuals with traumatic brain injury (TBI) (IwTBI) may still have impairments at the discourse level, even if these remain undetected by conventional aphasia tests. As a consequence, IwTBI may be impaired in conversational behavior and disadvantaged in their socio-communicative participation. Even though handling discourse is thought to be a basic requirement for participation and quality of life, only a handful of test procedures assessing discourse disorders have been developed so far. The MAKRO Screening is a recently developed screening tool designed to assess discourse impairments. The test construction is based on psycholinguistic frameworks and the concept of macro-rules, which refer to cognitive functions responsible for organizing and reducing complex information (e.g., propositional content) in discourse. Aim: The aim of our study was to investigate discourse processing in IwTBI in different tasks and to assess problems in communicative participation in the post-acute and chronic phase. In this context, we also aimed to analyze the influence of the severity of the initial impairment and the verbal executive abilities on the discourse performance. Additionally, the impact of macrolinguistic discourse impairments and verbal fluency on perceived communicative participation was targeted in our analysis. Methods: Data from 23 IwTBI (moderate to severe) and 23 healthy control subjects have been analyzed. They completed two subtests of the MAKRO screening: Text production and Inferences. Discourse performance was examined in relation to measures of semantic fluency and verbal task-switching. Socio-communicative problems were evaluated with the German version of the La Trobe Communication Questionnaire (LCQ). Results: IwTBI showed lower test results than the control group in the two subtests of the MAKRO-Screening. Difficulties in picture-based narrative text production also indicated greater perceived difficulties in communicative participation (LCQ). We also found that the subject's performance on the MAKRO-Screening subtests can partly be explained by underlying dysexecutive symptoms (in terms of verbal fluency and verbal task switching) and the severity of their injury. The preliminary results of our study show that cognitive-linguistic symptoms in IwTBI are also evident in the chronic phase. These can be detected with procedures referring to the discourse level, such as the MAKRO-Screening. The assessment of discourse performance should be an integral part in the rehabilitation of IwTBI in order to detect cognitive-linguistic communication disorders and to evaluate their impact on socio-communicative participation.

2.
Brain Inj ; 36(4): 514-527, 2022 03 21.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35125058

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Discourse impairments are common sequelae following TBI. Even though handling discourse is thought to be a basic requirement for social participation and quality of life, few test procedures to assess discourse disorders have been developed so far. OBJECTIVE: The main aim of this prospective cohort study was to evaluate the use of the MAKRO Screening for detecting deficits in discourse production and reception in a group of participants with TBI in the post-acute and chronic phase and their relation to executive functions (EF) and severity of brain injury. METHOD: Twenty individuals with TBI and a control group of healthy speakers performed on the MAKRO and on tests of EF (Regensburger Verbal Fluency Test; Tower of London; WAIS-IV digit span index). Group performance was evaluated on the basis of a scoring system and qualitative discourse analysis with focus on main concepts and coherence. Further, MAKRO scores were correlated with measures of EF. OUTCOMES: Individuals with TBI demonstrated significantly poorer performance within all MAKRO subtests. Discourse analysis revealed fewer main concepts and more frequent use of thematically inappropriate utterances. Performance can be partly explained by severity of initial injury and executive disorders. MAKRO presents a reliable and functional measure for discourse impairments.


Subject(s)
Brain Injuries , Communication Disorders , Adult , Brain Injuries/complications , Executive Function , Humans , Prospective Studies , Quality of Life
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...