Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 22
Filter
1.
Eur Ann Allergy Clin Immunol ; 50(1): 36-41, 2018 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29350020

ABSTRACT

Summary: Background and objective. Many studies have shown associations between HLAB*15:02, HLA-A*31:01 and carbamazepine (CBZ)-induced delayed cutaneous hypersensitivity reactions. The aim of this study is to evaluate a possible association between delayed cutaneous reactions to antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) and certain HLA-A and HLA-B alleles in the Turkish population. Methods. The study consisted of 3 groups: Group I (reactive group) included the patients who had documented delayed cutaneous reactions to any antiepileptic drug. Group II (non-reactive group) included the patients who have been on antiepileptic treatment at least for three months without any adverse reactions. Group III consisted of healthy subjects. The HLA-A and B alleles were analyzed in all groups. Results. Forty patients (29 female) had experienced different hypersensitivity reactions due to AEDs: maculopapular exanthema (26 patients), Stevens-Johnson syndrome (6 patients), drug rash with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (7 patients), toxic epidermal necrolysis (1 patient). Lamotrigine (11) and CBZ (10) were the most common culprit drugs involved in the reactions. The HLA-B*15:02 was not present in any of the study groups. However, HLA-B*35:02 was found in 4 patients from the reactive group, while it was not observed in non-reactive patients and was detected in only one healthy subject (p = 0.021). Conclusion. Although our preliminary results did not indicate a strong allele association with AED hypersensitivity, HLA-B*35:02 appears to be a candidate allele for MPE / DRESS / DIHSS induced by AED's in Turkish population. Further studies with a larger sample size may result in more comprehensive data about the genetic tendency for AED hypersensitivity in the Turkish population.


Subject(s)
Drug Hypersensitivity/genetics , Genotype , HLA-A Antigens/genetics , HLA-B Antigens/genetics , Hypersensitivity, Delayed/genetics , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Alleles , Allergens/immunology , Anticonvulsants/immunology , Anticonvulsants/therapeutic use , Carbamazepine/immunology , Carbamazepine/therapeutic use , Female , Genetic Association Studies , Genetic Predisposition to Disease , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Polymorphism, Genetic , Turkey , Young Adult
7.
Allergy ; 70(11): 1461-7, 2015 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26173603

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND/AIM: The consensus document for hypersensitivity reactions to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) proposed by the European Network for Drug Allergy (ENDA) interest group (2011) was revised in 2013. We aimed to evaluate the usability of the latest NSAID hypersensitivity classification of ENDA. METHOD: A total of 370 patients with a history of hypersensitivity reactions to NSAIDs among the 1250 outpatients referred for suspected drug allergy between July 2013 and June 2014 were evaluated, and 308 patients who were confirmed as having NSAID hypersensitivity were included in this study. After confirming the diagnosis, a single-blind placebo-controlled drug provocation test was performed with aspirin or diclofenac to categorize the patients according to the ENDA classification. The reactions not meeting the ENDA classification criteria were grouped as blended reactions. RESULTS: Among the 308 patients (224 female, mean age 42.12 ± 13.24), the leading cause of hypersensitivity reactions was metamizol (30.5%) followed by aspirin (30.2%). The most common NSAID hypersensitivity subgroup was SNIUAA (46.4%) and the least common type was SNIDR (1.6%). Cross-reactivity was identified in 50.3% of the patients. In five patients (1.6%), the hypersensitivity reactions to NSAIDs did not meet the ENDA classification: Three patients experienced anaphylaxis with different NSAIDs, one patient encountered anaphylaxis with one NSAID and urticaria with other NSAIDs, and the last patient had angioedema with different NSAIDs. CONCLUSION: The latest ENDA classification for NSAID hypersensitivity is generally a practical and useful instrument for clinicians. We only point out that anaphylaxis with different NSAIDs can be seen in a small group of patients.


Subject(s)
Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/adverse effects , Drug Hypersensitivity/diagnosis , Drug Hypersensitivity/immunology , Adolescent , Adult , Anaphylaxis/diagnosis , Anaphylaxis/immunology , Cross Reactions/immunology , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Odds Ratio , Risk Factors , Skin Tests , Young Adult
8.
Allergol. immunopatol ; 42(6): 573-579, nov.-dic. 2014. tab
Article in English | IBECS | ID: ibc-130148

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: No data are available on the incidence of drug hypersensitivity (DH) reactions in outpatient settings of tertiary allergy/immunology clinics. Our aims were to document the frequency of outpatient hospital admissions due to DH reactions to allergy/immunology clinics in adults and the management of these reactions in real life. We also investigated whether drug allergy affected social and medical behaviours of the patients. METHODS: This multi-centre study was performed for one year with the participation of 11 out of 16 tertiary allergy/clinical immunology clinics in Turkey. The study group consisted of the patients with DH reactions. Results of a questionnaire including drug reactions and management were recorded. RESULTS: Among 54,863 patients, 1000 patients with DH were enrolled with a median of 2.1% of all admissions. In real life conditions, the majority of approaches were performed for finding safe alternatives (65.5%; 1102 out of 1683) with 11.7% positivity. Diagnostic procedures were positive in 27% (154/581) of the patients. The majority of the patients had higher VAS scores for anxiety. A total of 250 subjects (25%) reported that they delayed some medical procedures because of DH. CONCLUSION: Our results documented the frequency of admissions due to DH reactions to allergy/clinical immunology clinics for the first time. Although physicians mostly preferred to perform drug tests in order to find safe alternatives, considering the fact that DH was confirmed in 27% of the patients, use of diagnostic tests should be encouraged, if no contraindication exists in order to avoid mislabelling patients as DH


No disponible


Subject(s)
Humans , Drug Hypersensitivity/epidemiology , Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions/epidemiology , Turkey/epidemiology , /statistics & numerical data , Skin Tests , Health Surveys/statistics & numerical data
11.
Allergol Immunopathol (Madr) ; 42(6): 573-9, 2014.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24269184

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: No data are available on the incidence of drug hypersensitivity (DH) reactions in outpatient settings of tertiary allergy/immunology clinics. Our aims were to document the frequency of outpatient hospital admissions due to DH reactions to allergy/immunology clinics in adults and the management of these reactions in real life. We also investigated whether drug allergy affected social and medical behaviours of the patients. METHODS: This multi-centre study was performed for one year with the participation of 11 out of 16 tertiary allergy/clinical immunology clinics in Turkey. The study group consisted of the patients with DH reactions. Results of a questionnaire including drug reactions and management were recorded. RESULTS: Among 54,863 patients, 1000 patients with DH were enrolled with a median of 2.1% of all admissions. In real life conditions, the majority of approaches were performed for finding safe alternatives (65.5%; 1102 out of 1683) with 11.7% positivity. Diagnostic procedures were positive in 27% (154/581) of the patients. The majority of the patients had higher VAS scores for anxiety. A total of 250 subjects (25%) reported that they delayed some medical procedures because of DH. CONCLUSION: Our results documented the frequency of admissions due to DH reactions to allergy/clinical immunology clinics for the first time. Although physicians mostly preferred to perform drug tests in order to find safe alternatives, considering the fact that DH was confirmed in 27% of the patients, use of diagnostic tests should be encouraged, if no contraindication exists in order to avoid mislabelling patients as DH.


Subject(s)
Anxiety Disorders/epidemiology , Drug Hypersensitivity/epidemiology , Hospitals, Special/statistics & numerical data , Patient Admission/statistics & numerical data , Tertiary Healthcare/statistics & numerical data , Administration, Oral , Adult , Allergens/adverse effects , Allergens/immunology , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/adverse effects , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/therapeutic use , Drug Hypersensitivity/diagnosis , Female , Humans , Immunization , Male , Perception , Turkey , beta-Lactams/adverse effects , beta-Lactams/therapeutic use
12.
Allergy ; 68(8): 1008-14, 2013 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23895584

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Data are limited about the value of skin tests in the diagnosis of proton pump inhibitor (PPI)-induced hypersensitivity reactions and the cross-reactivity between PPIs. We aimed to assess the role of skin testing in the diagnosis of PPI-related immediate hypersensitivity reactions and the cross-reactivity patterns among PPIs. METHODS: The study was designed in a prospective, national, multicentre nature. Sixty-five patients with a suggestive history of a PPI-induced immediate hypersensitivity reaction and 30 control subjects were included. Standardized skin prick and intradermal tests were carried out with a panel of PPIs. Single-blind, placebo-controlled oral provocation tests (OPTs) with the PPIs other than the culprit PPI that displayed negative results in skin tests (n = 61) and diagnostic OPTs with the suspected PPI (n = 12) were performed. RESULTS: The suspected PPIs were lansoprazole (n = 52), esomeprazole (n = 11), pantoprazole (n = 9), rabeprazole (n = 2), and omeprazole (n = 1). The sensitivity, specificity, and negative and positive predictive values of the skin tests with PPIs were 58.8%, 100%, 70.8%, and 100%, respectively. Fifteen of the 31 patients with a hypersensitivity reaction to lansoprazole had a positive OPT or skin test result with at least one of the alternative PPIs (8/52 pantoprazole, 6/52 omeprazole, 5/52 esomeprazole, 3/52 rabeprazole). CONCLUSION: Considering the high specificity, skin testing seems to be a useful method for the diagnosis of immediate-type hypersensitivity reactions to PPIs and for the evaluation of cross-reactivity among PPIs. However, OPT should be performed in case of negativity on skin tests.


Subject(s)
Hypersensitivity, Immediate/diagnosis , Hypersensitivity, Immediate/immunology , Proton Pump Inhibitors/adverse effects , Skin Tests/methods , Administration, Oral , Adult , Aged , Cross Reactions/immunology , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Omeprazole/administration & dosage , Omeprazole/adverse effects , Predictive Value of Tests , Prospective Studies , Proton Pump Inhibitors/administration & dosage , Single-Blind Method , Young Adult
13.
J Asthma ; 46(10): 1037-41, 2009 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19995143

ABSTRACT

Nasal polyposis (NP) is considered a subgroup of chronic rhinosinusitis and is commonly associated with asthma, bronchiectasis, and cystic fibrosis. A certain subgroup of nasal polyposis is known as Aspirin Exacerbated Respiratory Disease (AERD), previously called Samter's Triad or aspirin triad, comprising polyposis, asthma, and aspirin hypersensitivity and makes up almost 10% of cases of NP. Therapy of NP involves a combination of medical and surgical treatments. However, recurrences are common, particularly in patients with asthma and aspirin hypersensitivity. Both topical and systemic corticosteroids form the mainstay of conservative therapy for NP as well as a primary treatment and prevention for recurrences. They have been shown to improve nasal breathing, rhinitis symptoms, and reduce the size of NP, along with the rate of recurrence. There is great concern about the adverse effects of systemic steroids, especially when long-term usage is necessary to maintain improvement. So far, no knowledge exists about the effects of methotrexate (MTX) on NP of the patients with asthma. We report two patients whose NP dramatically reduced in size after a course of MTX therapy administered as an additional treatment for their steroid- dependent asthma.


Subject(s)
Aspirin/immunology , Asthma/drug therapy , Drug Hypersensitivity/complications , Methotrexate/therapeutic use , Nasal Polyps/drug therapy , Adrenal Cortex Hormones/therapeutic use , Aged , Asthma/complications , Asthma/physiopathology , Endoscopy , Female , Forced Expiratory Volume/drug effects , Forced Expiratory Volume/physiology , Humans , Methotrexate/pharmacology , Methylprednisolone/therapeutic use , Middle Aged , Nasal Cavity/drug effects , Nasal Cavity/pathology , Nasal Polyps/complications , Nasal Polyps/diagnostic imaging , Nasal Polyps/pathology , Paranasal Sinuses/diagnostic imaging , Paranasal Sinuses/drug effects , Tomography, X-Ray Computed
14.
J Oral Rehabil ; 36(11): 831-9, 2009 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19793386

ABSTRACT

The aim of this study is to create a Turkish version of the Revised Dental Beliefs Survey (DBS-R) and describe its psychometric properties. The participants were 420 general dental patients. The results of the exploratory factor analysis revealed that the DBS-R consisted of three factors consisting of 22 items. Confirmatory factor analysis results showed that the 22-item three-factor version fit the data better than the original 28-item English language four-factor structure model proposed in Odontol Scand (2004;62:21). The internal reliability of the Turkish version of the DBS-R was Cronbach alpha of 0.88. The correlation between the Turkish version of the DBS-R and the Modified Dental Anxiety Scale (MDAS) was 0.29. Scores on the 22-item version were higher for anxious participants (MDAS > or = 15) than those determined to be not anxious [59.4 +/- 15.5 vs. 51.1 +/- 17.2 (t = -4.38, P < 0.0001)]. In conclusion, a 22-item modified version of the DBS-R in Turkish appears reliable and valid.


Subject(s)
Dental Anxiety/psychology , Dental Care/psychology , Surveys and Questionnaires , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Attitude to Health/ethnology , Dental Anxiety/epidemiology , Dental Anxiety/ethnology , Female , Humans , Language , Male , Middle Aged , Psychometrics , Reproducibility of Results , Turkey/epidemiology , Young Adult
16.
Clin Exp Allergy ; 38(8): 1333-41, 2008 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18537984

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Until the present, no comprehensive studies evaluating the prevalence of food allergy and non-allergic food hypersensitivity (FA/NAFH) in adults have been done in Turkey or its surrounding countries. OBJECTIVE: This large population-based study was planned to identify the confirmed prevalence of adverse reactions to food in adults in Istanbul. METHODS: A total of 17 064 telephone numbers were randomly selected from both the European and Asian sides of Istanbul, and the 11 816 subjects who agreed to participate in the study were addressed with a questionnaire of eight items. Those who disclosed food-related complaints in this survey were called again and a similar questionnaire was repeated. The respondents who were suspected of having food allergy or food hypersensitivity were invited for a personal clinical investigation that included double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenge tests. RESULTS: The lifetime prevalence of self-reported FA/NAFH was found to be 9.5% [1118/11 816; 95% confidence interval (CI): 8.94-10.00%]. After the clinical investigations, the point prevalence of FA/NAFH, which also included the 'possible FA/NAFH group', was found to be as low as 0.3% (30/11 816; 95% CI: 0.17-0.36%), and the FA/NAFH rates assessed by double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenge tests were 0.1% (12/11 816; 95% CI: 0.05-0.18%) and 0.1% (11/11 816; 95% CI: 0.05-0.17%), respectively. The most significant factor influencing FA/NAFH was familial atopy (adjusted OR 4.3; 95% CI: 3.67-4.99), and the most related atopic disease was itching dermatitis/urticaria (adjusted OR: 3.9; 95% CI: 3.31-4.54). CONCLUSION: We may conclude that FA/NAFH in the Turkish population seems to be low when compared with Northern and Western European countries. This may be due to genetic, cultural or dietary factors, and further studies evaluating the reasons for this low prevalence of FA/NAFH in our population are needed.


Subject(s)
Food Hypersensitivity/epidemiology , Hypersensitivity/epidemiology , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Food Hypersensitivity/immunology , Humans , Hypersensitivity/immunology , Male , Middle Aged , Prevalence , Skin Tests , Turkey/epidemiology
17.
Arch. alerg. inmunol. clin ; 39(4): 176-177, 2008.
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: lil-619148

ABSTRACT

Objetivos. Determinar la prevalencia de la morbilidad psiquiátrica en los pacientes con urticaria crónica idiopática (UCI); determinar la calidad de vida relacionada con la salud (HRQL) en los pacientes con UCI en comparación con controles sanos. Métodos. Se seleccionaron 350 pacientes con urticaria crónica, entre el 1/01/2005 y 31/04/2005 en el Departamento de Alergia de la Universidad de Estambul, que cumplieran con los criterios de inclusión: pacientes con diagnóstico de UCI, con edad de entre 18 y 65 años, sin síntomas psicóticos ni retardo mental, con capacidad cognitiva normal y ausencia de enfermedad comórbida. Como control se eligió un grupo de individuos sanos con características demográficas comunes. Todos los participantes recibieron información sobre el estudio mediante consentimiento informado. Se realizó el diagnóstico de UCI descartando, para ello, todas las causas posibles (drogas, químicos, alimentos) mediante dietas de eliminación y con prick tests negativos. Además, se realizaron exámenes de laboratorio: hematología, enzimas hepáticas, hormonas tiroideas, anticuerpos antinucleares y test del suero autólogo. Se utilizó una escala visual analógica, además de entrevistas clínicas para medir la severidad de la enfermedad. Por otra parte, la evaluación psiquiátrica consistió en: entrevistas de forma semiestructurada en donde los participantes completaron un cuestionario de HRQL (resultado de la encuesta de salud) de 36 ítems de forma corta (SF-36) y además una entrevista clínica estructurada por el eje DSM-IV para diagnóstico de enfermedad psiquiátrica en los pacientes con UCI. Resultados. En este estudio se incluyó a 84 pacientes con UCI y 75 controles sanos. La media de edad ± desvío estándar fue 36,83 ± 10,26. El 84% de los pacientes eran mujeres; la duración media (±DE) de la enfermedad fue 6,34 ± 7,2 años y los síntomas fueron intermitentes en el 51% de los pacientes.


Subject(s)
Humans , Adolescent , Adult , Urticaria/complications , Quality of Life , Mental Disorders/etiology
18.
Eur J Med Res ; 9(12): 570-2, 2004 Dec 22.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15689305

ABSTRACT

Hashimoto thyroiditis (HT), which is an autoimmune disease of thyroid gland, has been declared to present with concomitant several systemic diseases. In this study, the coexistence of the Hashimoto disease with the sleep apnea syndrome has been examined. Seven female patients (33-66 year of age) with Hashimoto thyroiditis were evaluated for sleep apnea syndrome. The diagnosis of Hashimoto disease was based on the high titers of anti-thyroid antibodies and histological findings. None of the patients had any complaints of sleep disturbances. Seven healthy subjects with similar age and sex characteristics were taken as the control group. All the patients and the control subjects were undertaken a full polysomnography (PSG). Five patients with HT showed the characteristics of obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (one severe, one moderate and three mild OSAS), whereas no sleep breathing disturbance was found in the control group. These findings suggest that sleep related breathing problems may develop in the patients with autoimmune thyroiditis even if they are euthyroid.


Subject(s)
Sleep Apnea, Obstructive/etiology , Thyroiditis, Autoimmune/complications , Adult , Aged , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Sleep Apnea, Obstructive/physiopathology
19.
Med Princ Pract ; 12(3): 184-8, 2003.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12766338

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: This study was undertaken to investigate the prevalence of HBsAg, anti-HBs and anti-HCV positivity in Istanbul, Turkey. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: The frequencies of HBsAg, anti-HBs and anti-HCV positivity were determined in 1,157 randomly selected patients attending the outpatient clinic of Istanbul University Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey, during the years 1998 and 2001. All patients underwent complete physical and various routine laboratory examinations. RESULTS: Of the 1,157 patients, the prevalence of HBsAg, anti-HBs and anti-HCV was 6.6, 28.1 and 2.4%, respectively. It appeared that having dental and surgical procedures formed the risk factors for HBV infection. HBsAg positivity in the health care workers was not different from that of the other professions, but anti-HBs was significantly higher in this group. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate that HBV infection occurs more frequently than HCV in Istanbul, and this poses an important health problem in the community.


Subject(s)
Hepatitis B Antibodies/blood , Hepatitis B Surface Antigens/blood , Hepatitis B/epidemiology , Hepatitis C Antibodies/blood , Hepatitis C/epidemiology , Adolescent , Adult , Age Distribution , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Biomarkers/blood , Female , Health Personnel/statistics & numerical data , Hepatitis B/blood , Hepatitis B/immunology , Hepatitis C/blood , Hepatitis C/immunology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prevalence , Residence Characteristics , Risk Factors , Seroepidemiologic Studies , Turkey/epidemiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...