Rational optimization of a transcription factor activation domain inhibitor.

Transcription factors are among the most attractive therapeutic targets but are considered largely 'undruggable' in part due to the intrinsically disordered nature of their activation domains. Here we show that the aromatic character of the activation domain of the androgen receptor, a therapeutic target for castration-resistant prostate cancer, is key for its activity as transcription factor, allowing it to translocate to the nucleus and partition into transcriptional condensates upon activation by androgens. On the basis of our understanding of the interactions stabilizing such condensates and of the structure that the domain adopts upon condensation, we optimized the structure of a small-molecule inhibitor previously identified by phenotypic screening. The optimized compounds had more affinity for their target, inhibited androgen-receptor-dependent transcriptional programs, and had an antitumorigenic effect in models of castration-resistant prostate cancer in cells and in vivo. These results suggest that it is possible to rationally optimize, and potentially even to design, small molecules that target the activation domains of oncogenic transcription factors.

Residual gammaH2AX foci as an indication of lethal DNA lesions.

BACKGROUND: Evidence suggests that tumor cells exposed to some DNA damaging agents are more likely to die if they retain microscopically visible gammaH2AX foci that are known to mark sites of double-strand breaks. This appears to be true even after exposure to the alkylating agent MNNG that does not cause direct double-strand breaks but does produce gammaH2AX foci when damaged DNA undergoes replication. METHODS: To examine this predictive ability further, SiHa human cervical carcinoma cells were exposed to 8 DNA damaging drugs (camptothecin, cisplatin, doxorubicin, etoposide, hydrogen peroxide, MNNG, temozolomide, and tirapazamine) and the fraction of cells that retained gammaH2AX foci 24 hours after a 30 or 60 min treatment was compared with the fraction of cells that lost clonogenicity. To determine if cells with residual repair foci are the cells that die, SiHa cervical cancer cells were stably transfected with a RAD51-GFP construct and live cell analysis was used to follow the fate of irradiated cells with RAD51-GFP foci. RESULTS: For all drugs regardless of their mechanism of interaction with DNA, close to a 1:1 correlation was observed between clonogenic surviving fraction and the fraction of cells that retained gammaH2AX foci 24 hours after treatment. Initial studies established that the fraction of cells that retained RAD51 foci after irradiation was similar to the fraction of cells that retained gammaH2AX foci and subsequently lost clonogenicity. Tracking individual irradiated live cells confirmed that SiHa cells with RAD51-GFP foci 24 hours after irradiation were more likely to die. CONCLUSION: Retention of DNA damage-induced gammaH2AX foci appears to be indicative of lethal DNA damage so that it may be possible to predict tumor cell killing by a wide variety of DNA damaging agents simply by scoring the fraction of cells that retain gammaH2AX foci.

Endogenous and radiation-induced expression of gammaH2AX in biopsies from patients treated for carcinoma of the uterine cervix.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The possibility of using gammaH2AX foci as a marker of DNA damage and as a potential predictor of tumour response to treatment was examined using biopsies from 3 sets of patients with advanced carcinoma of the cervix. The relation between endogenous gammaH2AX expression and hypoxia was also examined. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Set 1 consisted of 26 biopsies that included pre-treatment and 24h post-radiation treatment samples. Pre-treatment biopsies from 12 patients in Set 2 were used to develop image analysis software while pre-treatment biopsies from 33 patients in Set 3 were examined for the relation between staining for the hypoxia marker pimonidazole and endogenous gammaH2AX expression. Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded sections were analyzed after antigen retrieval and fluorescence antibody labeling for the hypoxia markers CAIX or pimonidazole in combination with gammaH2AX staining. RESULTS: Before treatment, 24+/-19% of cells contained gammaH2AX foci, with most positive cells containing fewer than 5 foci per nucleus. Twenty-four hours after exposure to the first fraction of 1.8-2.5Gy, 38+/-19% contained foci. CAIX positive cells were 1.4 times more likely to exhibit endogenous gammaH2AX foci, and pimonidazole-positive cells were 2.8 times more likely to contain gammaH2AX foci. For 18 patients for whom both pre-treatment and 24h post-irradiation biopsies were available, local control was unrelated to the fraction of cells that retained gammaH2AX foci. However, 24h after irradiation, tumours that had received 2.5Gy showed a significantly higher fraction of cells with residual gammaH2AX foci than tumours given 1.8Gy. CONCLUSIONS: Endogenous gammaH2AX foci are enriched in hypoxic tumour regions. Small differences in delivered dose can produce quantifiable differences in residual DNA damage that can overshadow inter-tumour differences in response.

gammaH2AX expression in tumors exposed to cisplatin and fractionated irradiation.

PURPOSE: Is retention of gammaH2AX foci useful as a biomarker for predicting the response of xenograft tumors to cisplatin with X-ray? Is a similar approach feasible using biopsies from patients with cervical cancer? EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Mice bearing SiHa, WiDr, or HCT116 xenograft tumors were exposed to cisplatin and/or three daily doses of 2 Gy. Tumors were excised 24 h after treatment and single cells were analyzed for clonogenic fraction and retention of gammaH2AX foci. Tumor biopsies were examined using 47 paraffin-embedded sections from untreated tumors and 24 sections from 8 patients undergoing radiochemotherapy for advanced cancer of the cervix. RESULTS: Residual gammaH2AX measured 24 h after cisplatin injection accurately predicted surviving fraction in SiHa and WiDr xenografts. When a clinically equivalent protocol using cisplatin and fractionated irradiation was employed, the fraction of xenograft cells lacking gammaH2AX ranked survival accurately but underestimated tumor cell kill. Residual gammaH2AX foci were detected in clinical samples; on average, only 25% of tumor nuclei exhibited one or more gammaH2AX foci before treatment and 74% after the start of treatment. CONCLUSION: gammaH2AX can provide useful information on the response of human tumors to the combination of cisplatin and radiation, but prediction becomes less accurate as more time elapses between treatment and tumor biopsy. Use of residual gammaH2AX as a biomarker for response is feasible when cell survival exceeds approximately 20%, but heterogeneity in endogenous and treatment-induced gammaH2AX must be considered.