Treatment with curative intent of stage III non-small cell lung cancer patients of 75 years: a prospective population-based study.

BACKGROUND: There is little data on the survival of elderly patients with stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: Patients with stage III NSCLC in the Netherlands Cancer Registry/Limburg from January 1, 2002 to December 31, 2008 were included. FINDINGS: One thousand and two patients with stage III were diagnosed, of which 237 were 75 years or older. From 228 patients, co-morbidity scores were available. Only 33/237 patients (14.5%) had no co-morbidities, 195 (85.5%) had one or more important co-morbidities, 60 (26.3%) two or more co-morbidities, 18 (7.9%) three or more co-morbidities and 2 patients (0.9%) suffered from four co-morbidities. Forty-eight percent were treated with curative intent. No significant difference in Charlson co-morbidity, age or gender was found between patients receiving curative or palliative intent treatment. Treatment with curative intent was associated with increased overall survival (OS) compared to palliative treatment: median OS 14.2 months (9.6-18.7) versus 5.2 months (4.3-6.0), 2-year OS 35.5% versus 12.1%, for curative versus palliative treatment. FINDINGS: Patients who received only radiotherapy with curative intent had a median OS of 11.1 months (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 6.4-15.8) and a 5-year OS of 20.3%; for sequential chemotherapy and radiotherapy, the median OS was 18.0 months (95% CI 12.2-23.7), with a 5-year OS of 14.9%. Only four patients received concurrent chemo-radiation. INTERPRETATION: In this prospective series treating elderly patients with stage III NSCLC with curative intent was associated with significant 5-year survival rates.

Is contrast enhancement required to visualize a known breast tumor in a pre-operative CT scan?

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: A pre-operative CT scan with contrast enhancement (CE) has recently been proposed to improve tumorbed delineation in breast conserving therapy. However, it is not clear whether CE is required for visualization of a known breast tumor. The main aims of this study were to compare the sensitivity of a CE-CT scan with a native CT scan (i.e. without CE) and to identify characteristics predictive for the requirement of CE. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Both a CE-CT and a native CT were made in 58 breast cancer patients (age 37-75 yr), prior to breast conserving surgery. Visibility of the tumor on CT was scored by three observers (clearly visible/doubtful/not visible). Age, tumor size, palpable tumor yes/no, histology, and visibility on mammography were analyzed with respect to the visibility of the tumor on the native CT. RESULTS: The sensitivity for tumor detection was better for CE-CT (95%) than for native CT (83%) (p<0.001). Only mammographic visibility scores appeared to be significantly correlated with the visibility of the tumor on the native CT (p=0.013). CONCLUSION: In most patients CE is not required to visualize a known breast tumor. Mammographic visibility is a good parameter to decide on the use of CE.

Effects of radiotherapy planning with a dedicated combined PET-CT-simulator of patients with non-small cell lung cancer on dose limiting normal tissues and radiation dose-escalation: a planning study.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To investigate the effect of radiotherapy planning with a dedicated combined PET-CT simulator of patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-one patients underwent a pre-treatment simulation on a dedicated hybrid PET-CT-simulator. For each patient, two 3D conformal treatment plans were made: one with a CT based PTV and one with a PET-CT based PTV, both to deliver 60Gy in 30 fractions. The maximum tolerable prescribed radiation dose for CT versus PET-CT PTV was calculated based on constraints for the lung, the oesophagus, and the spinal cord, and the Tumour Control Probability (TCP) was estimated. RESULTS: For the same toxicity levels of the lung, oesophagus and spinal cord, the dose could be increased from 55.2+/-2.0Gy with CT planning to 68.9+/-3.3Gy with the use of PET-CT (P=0.002), with corresponding TCP's of 6.3+/-1.5% for CT and 24.0+/-5.6% for PET-CT planning (P=0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The use of a combined dedicated PET-CT-simulator reduced radiation exposure of the oesophagus and the lung, and thus allowed significant radiation dose escalation whilst respecting all relevant normal tissue constraints.