Gender Disparities in Neurobehavioral Symptoms and the Role of Post-Traumatic Symptoms in US Service Members Following Mild Traumatic Brain Injury.

Women are more directly involved in combat operations today than ever before, currently making up 18.6% of officers and 16.8% of enlisted personnel in the United States military. However, women continue to be under-represented in military research. Studies that do consider gender differences in traumatic brain injury (TBI) outcomes have shown that women report significantly more post-concussive symptoms than men. Conclusions for true gender differences related to TBI are hard to make without controlling for non-TBI factors. The effects previously identified in the literature may be an artifact of how men and women differ in their response to injury, unrelated to the neurological recovery process associated with TBI. The objective of this study was to examine the effects of gender specifics on mild TBI (mTBI) sequelae on injured and uninjured control groups, and to investigate the role of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) on symptom reporting. It should be noted that the terms "gender" and "men/women" are used in this article in place of "sex" or "males/females" given that we are not discussing biological attributes. A total of 966 United States military service members and veterans were included in the study. Of the total sample, 455 men and 46 women were in the mTBI group, 285 men and 31 women were in the injured controls group (IC), and 111 men and 38 women in the non-injured controls group (NIC). Post-concussive and quality of life symptoms were compared for men and women while controlling for combat exposure. MTBI and IC groups were also stratified by PTSD presentation. Measures used included the Neurobehavioral Symptom Inventory (NSI), PTSD Checklist (PCL-C), Traumatic Brain Injury Quality of Life (TBI-QOL), and Combat Exposure Scale. In the mTBI group, women had worse scores on NSI total, NSI Somatosensory and Affective clusters, and the TBI-QOL Anxiety, Fatigue, and Headache scales (n2 = 0.018-0.032, small to small-medium effect sizes). When PTSD was present, women had worse scores on the NSI Somatosensory cluster only (n2 = 0.029, small-medium effect size). In contrast, when PTSD was absent, women had worse scores than men on the NSI Somatosensory and Affective clusters, and the TBI-QOL Anxiety and Headache scales (n2 = 0.032-0.063, small to medium effect sizes). In the IC group, women had worse scores on the NSI Cognitive cluster and the TBI-QOL Fatigue and Pain Interference scales (n2 = 0.024-0.042, small to small-medium effect sizes). However, group differences were no longer found when stratified by PTSD sub-groups. In the NIC group, there were no significant group differences for any analyses. We were able to identify symptoms unique to women recovering from mTBI that were not present following other forms of physical injury or in healthy controls. However, the impact of PTSD exacerbates the symptom profile and its comorbidity with mTBI equates to most of the noted gender differences.

Perspectives on Development of Measures to Estimate Career Blast Exposure History in Service Members and Veterans.

The Department of Defense (DOD) has recently prioritized the investigation of the acute and chronic adverse brain health and performance effects of low-level blast (LLB) generated by the use of weapons systems. While acute exposure can be quantified by sensor technology, career exposure has no widely accepted and validated measure for characterization. Currently, distinct research groups are developing and validating four promising measures to estimate career blast exposure history: the Salisbury Blast Interview, Blast Exposure Threshold Survey, Blast Ordnance and Occupational Exposure Measure, and the Blast Frequency and Symptom Severity. Each measure offers an assessment of blast history that is uniquely beneficial to addressing specific research questions. However, use of divergent strategies is not efficient to accelerate the field's understanding of the impact of career exposure and Service-connected health outcomes. As a DOD-wide solution, collaboration across these groups is required to develop a tool(s) that can be standardized across research studies and, ultimately, pared down to be implemented in clinical settings. Here, we overview the current four measures and provide a perspective on the way forward for optimization and/or combination in support of this solution.

Presenting symptoms as prognostic measures of mental health recovery among service members with concussion.

Background: Comorbid mental illness may negatively impact recovery from concussion. This study evaluated whether the level of symptom clusters at clinic intake contribute to poor mental health recovery in concussed patients during treatment, which may in turn serve as a target intervention. Objective: The objective of this study is to examine the association between the level of initial symptoms and mental health symptoms among service members with concussion. Methods: Data were obtained from 483 active duty service members treated in interdisciplinary treatment programs for traumatic brain injury, all of which were concussions. Pre-treatment symptom clusters included self-reported hyperarousal, dissociation/depression, cognitive dysfunction/headache and neurological symptoms. The outcomes, clinically-relevant decreases in depressive symptoms (assessed by the 8-item Patient Health Questionnaire, PHQ-8) and PTSD symptoms (assessed by the PTSD Checklist for DSM-5, PCL-5), were defined as a decrease in PHQ-8 > 5 and PCL-5 > 7, respectively. Poisson regression with robust error variance was used to evaluate the relationship between the level of each symptom cluster and clinically-relevant decrease in outcomes. Results: Participants with higher (vs. lower) levels of pre-treatment hyperarousal and dissociation/depression symptom cluster were less likely to improve in depressive and PTSD symptoms during treatment. The level of cognitive/headache and neurological symptom clusters were not significantly associated with any symptom changes. Conclusion: These findings support the need for individualized treatment for symptoms identified and treated after determining concussion history, with particular attention to high levels of hyperarousal and dissociation/depression prior to treatment.

Disparities in mental health symptoms recovery across race/ethnicity and education level following mild traumatic brain injury.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between race/ethnicity and post-concussive mental health (i.e., depressive, post-traumatic stress disorder [PTSD]) and neurobehavioral symptoms among service members, and whether this association differed by education level. Methods: The study sample consisted of 524 patients from a multidisciplinary US military outpatient treatment facility for post-concussive symptoms. Poisson regression with robust error variance was utilized to investigate outcome (i.e., clinically-elevated depressive [Patient Health Questionnaire-8 ≥15], PTSD [PTSD Checklist, DSM 5 ≥38] and neurobehavioral [Neurobehavioral Symptom Inventory >75th percentile] symptoms at admission and last follow-up in this cohort study. Modification by education level (low [no college degree] vs. high [associate's degree or higher]) was additionally evaluated. Results: The relationship between race/ethnicity and mental health/neurobehavioral symptoms varied by education level (p-interaction: depressive symptoms = 0.002, PTSD symptoms = 0.035, neurobehavioral symptoms = 0.040). Specifically, non-Whites were at a significantly higher prevalence for clinically-elevated depressive symptoms post-treatment than Whites, but only among those with higher education level (PR = 2.22, CI = 1.37-3.59). A similar trend was demonstrated for PTSD and neurobehavioral symptoms. Conclusion: Military healthcare may need to increase depression-focused treatment options that are acceptable for racial/ethnic minority patients, particularly those with higher education, while they are recovering from comorbid traumatic brain injury.

Impact of Prior Brain Injury on Concussion Recovery in Military Personnel: Evaluation of Timing Between Concussions.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the potential impact of timing between the current and the most recent previous concussions on symptom severity among acutely concussed active duty military Service members (SMs). SETTING: Three military installations. PARTICIPANTS: Eighty-four SMs aged 18 to 44 years who sustained a concussion within 72 hours of enrollment. No previous concussion within 1 year preenrollment. DESIGN: Longitudinal study with enrollment within 72 hours of injury, and follow-up at 1 week and 1 month postinjury. MAIN MEASURES: Lifetime concussion history (yes/no) and recency of the latest concussion (no history, relatively more recent [1 to <6 years ago], and more remote [6+ years ago]) from the current concussion using the Ohio State University Traumatic Brain Injury Identification Method-Interview Form. Symptom severity (total and by categories: cognitive, affective, somatosensory, vestibular) at all time points using the Neurobehavioral Symptoms Inventory. RESULTS: Concussion history assessed as having any previous concussion was not found significantly related to symptom severity (total or by categories) following a current concussion. However, when timing between concussion was taken into account, time since previous concussion was significantly related to symptomatology, whereby those with relatively more recent previous concussion had greater total symptoms within 72 hours of injury and at 1 week postinjury (though not at 1 month) than those with more remote previous concussion (≤72 hours: difference = 15.4, 95% CI = 1.8 to 29.1; 1 week: difference = 15.2, 95% CI = 1.2 to 29.2) or no history (≤72 hours: difference = 11.6, 95% CI = 0.4 to 22.8; 1 week: difference = 13.9, 95% CI = 2.4 to 25.4). When evaluated by symptom category, this relationship was particularly important on affective and somatosensory symptoms. CONCLUSION: In recently concussed active duty SMs, the timing between the current and previous concussions may be an important factor in determining prognosis. Clinical assessment of concussion history that accounts for the timing of the most recent event may be necessary to identify patients who may require a more conservative plan of care and more gradual return to activity in the acute recovery stage.

Use of a randomized clinical trial design to study cognitive rehabilitation approaches to enhance warfighter performance.

Within the military, cognitive readiness is essential to ensure the warfighter can return to highly demanding combat training and deployment operations. The warfighter must be able to make split second decisions and adapt to new tools and environments. After a traumatic brain injury, clinicians helping the warfighter must have techniques that address warfighter cognitive readiness. Current rehabilitation for cognitive complaints used in military medicine are modeled after civilian therapies which focus on remediating moderate to severe impairment through building compensatory strategies. This traditional approach to cognitive rehabilitation does not translate well to mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) where impairments are subtle, nor does it meet the needs of our warfighters in deployed and combat training environments. Challenging our current methods is critical in adapting to the needs of this highly valued population to ensure that our warfighters are able to carry out mission critical decision making. Here we present a review of our best current practices for cognitive rehabilitation, describe the limitations our traditional approaches impose for mTBI in military personnel, and present an alternative treatment called Strategic Memory Advanced Reasoning Training (SMART) that can be adopted through a randomized clinical trial design. We propose directly comparing traditional treatment approaches with a novel cognitive rehabilitation strategy which has been well validated outside of the military setting. Procedures were developed to execute this clinical trial in a way that is most relevant to the study population by establishing ecologically valid outcome metrics.

National Institutes of Health Toolbox Emotion Battery: Application of Summary Scores to Adults With Spinal Cord Injury, Traumatic Brain Injury, and Stroke.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the validity of factor analytically based summary scores that were developed using the National Institutes of Health Toolbox Emotion Battery (NIHTB-EB); (ie, psychological well-being, social satisfaction, negative affect) normative sample in individuals with neurologic conditions. DESIGN: Cross-sectional, observational cohort. SETTING: Community. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 1036 English-speaking adults from the National Institutes of Health Toolbox (NIHTB) normative project and 604 community-dwelling adults with neurologic conditions including spinal cord injury (SCI n=209), traumatic brain injury (TBI n=184), and stroke (cerebrovascular accident [CVA] n=211) (N=1640). INTERVENTION: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The NIHTB-EB. RESULTS: A series of univariate analyses comparing summary scores across the 4 groups (SCI, TBI, CVA, normative group) were conducted to identify group differences. Base rates (defined as >1 SD toward the problematic direction) were also identified. The normative group demonstrated better emotional functioning characterized by greater social satisfaction and psychological well-being (normative group > SCI, TBI, CVA; P's <.0001), and less negative affect (normative group < SCI, P=.016; normative group < TBI, P<.001; normative group < CVA; P=.034) compared with each neurologic group. Using base rates to identify problematic emotions for the 3 summary scores, there were higher rates of problematic emotions on all 3 summary scores for the neurologic groups compared with the normative group. CONCLUSIONS: The NIHTB-EB summary scores demonstrate an increased prevalence of problematic emotions among individuals with 3 neurologic conditions, and might be useful for identifying individuals with similar conditions and potentially in need of psychological support.

National Institutes of Health Toolbox Emotion Battery for English- and Spanish-speaking adults: normative data and factor-based summary scores.

BACKGROUND: The National Institutes of Health Toolbox Emotion Battery (NIHTB-EB) is a "common currency", computerized assessment developed to measure the full spectrum of emotional health. Though comprehensive, the NIHTB-EB's 17 scales may be unwieldy for users aiming to capture more global indices of emotional functioning. METHODS: NIHTB-EB was administered to 1,036 English-speaking and 408 Spanish-speaking adults as a part of the NIH Toolbox norming project. We examined the factor structure of the NIHTB-EB in English- and Spanish-speaking adults and developed factor analysis-based summary scores. Census-weighted norms were presented for English speakers, and sample-weighted norms were presented for Spanish speakers. RESULTS: Exploratory factor analysis for both English- and Spanish-speaking cohorts resulted in the same 3-factor solution: 1) negative affect, 2) social satisfaction, and 3) psychological well-being. Confirmatory factor analysis supported similar factor structures for English- and Spanish-speaking cohorts. Model fit indices fell within the acceptable/good range, and our final solution was optimal compared to other solutions. CONCLUSION: Summary scores based upon the normative samples appear to be psychometrically supported and should be applied to clinical samples to further validate the factor structures and investigate rates of problematic emotions in medical and psychiatric populations.