ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the fastest growing cancer in the United States. Studies have shown that compared to Blacks and non-Hispanic Whites, Hispanics have a higher HCC incidence and mortality rate. Most studies investigating HCC in Hispanics have been conducted utilizing data largely from the Western and Southern United States. These findings may, however, not be highly representative of Hispanics in the Northeast, given the nonhomogenous distribution and diversity of Hispanics across the United States. METHODS: Some 148 HCC patients diagnosed between 1996 and 2012 were identified from a tertiary center in the northeastern United States. Hispanic patients were randomly matched to non-Hispanic White patients by year of diagnosis. Patient characteristics, HCC risk factors, treatment, and outcome were recorded. A Kaplan-Meier (KM) plot with log-rank tests was used for survival analysis. RESULTS: Compared to non-Hispanic White patients (n=89), Hispanic HCC patients (n=59) were more likely to have chronic hepatitis C infection (69.5% vs. 38.2%, p < 0.01), alcoholic liver disease (37.3% vs. 21.4%, p = 0.04) and were less likely to have chronic hepatitis B infection (6.8% vs. 24.7%, p = 0.01), and private insurance (37.3% vs. 57.3%, p = 0.02). Hispanics were more likely to be diagnosed with an earlier stage disease (Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer, BCLC stages A and B) compared to non-Hispanic patients (71.7% vs. 36.8%, p < 0.01) and were more likely to receive locoregional treatment. Although Hispanics trended towards improved overall survival, this finding did not hold when stratified by the BCLC stage. CONCLUSION: Risk factors for HCC in the northeastern Hispanic population are like those found among Hispanics in other US regions. Other research suggests Hispanics are at increased risk for hepatic injury and HCC. However, HCC in this northeastern Hispanic population appears to be less aggressive (earlier stage and trend towards better overall survival) than non-Hispanics. Further research may be needed to identify potential differences by ethnic group for HCC risk factors, presentation, and outcomes.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The multidisciplinary tumour conference (MTC) represents the standard of care in the management of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Clinical outcomes in relation to adherence and non-adherence to MTC recommendations have not been studied. METHODS: A total of 137 patients with HCC and cirrhosis whose cases were submitted to a first MTC discussion between 1 January 2009 and 31 December 2010 were identified. Clinical data, management recommendations, adherence, treatment regimens and overall survival were reviewed. RESULTS: There were 419 MTC discussions on 137 patients with cirrhosis and HCC. The MTC recommendations made in 145 discussions on 90 separate patients were not followed. Patient-related reasons for deviation from MTC recommendations included failure to attend for follow-up (n = 24, 16.6%), clinical deterioration (n = 19, 13.1%) and patient preference (n = 13, 9.0%). Physician-related reasons for discordance included treating physician preference (n = 43, 29.7%) and finding that the patient was not a candidate for the recommended intervention (n = 37, 25.5%). After the first MTC discussion, 62.0% of patients received the recommended treatment; these patients were more likely to be alive at 1 year compared with those who did not receive the recommended treatment (P = 0.007). More of the patients who followed recommendations underwent liver transplantation (25.6% versus 14.4%; P = 0.10). CONCLUSIONS: There are patient-related as well as physician-related reasons for non-adherence to recommendations. Non-adherence affects clinical outcomes and can be avoided in selected cases.
