Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
2.
BMJ Case Rep ; 13(11)2020 Nov 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33257377

ABSTRACT

A 59-year-old man presented to the urology department with increased urinary urgency, frequency, poor urinary flow and unintentional weight loss. He had a 25-year history of idiopathic urticaria episodes which had increased in frequency over the previous 2 months. On investigation, he was found to have a raised prostate-specific antigen level. He was investigated further with a multiparametric MRI, a local anaesthetic transperineal prostate biopsy, a CT scan of chest/abdomen/pelvis with contrast and a nuclear medicine bone scan. He was diagnosed with metastatic adenocarcinoma of the prostate and commenced on a luteinising hormone-releasing hormone antagonist and referred to oncology for further treatment. Since starting treatment, he has experienced no further episodes of urticaria.


Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma/secondary , Prostatic Neoplasms/pathology , Urticaria/etiology , Adenocarcinoma/complications , Adenocarcinoma/diagnostic imaging , Humans , Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms , Male , Middle Aged , Paraneoplastic Syndromes/etiology , Prostate/diagnostic imaging , Prostatic Neoplasms/complications , Prostatic Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging
3.
Transl Androl Urol ; 8(Suppl 4): S371-S380, 2019 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31656743

ABSTRACT

With an increase in the number of ureteroscopy (URS) procedures, URS is now performed more widely and is becoming a standard procedure for all urologists. There is also a rise in the complexity of these procedures and URS is now offered for treatment of stones as well as for diagnosis and treatment of urothelial tumours. We wanted to provide a 'pictorial review' of the 'tips and tricks' of URS, as the finer and technical details are often easier to understand and remember with images rather than through textual explanations.

4.
Urol Int ; 103(2): 143-148, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31291641

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: While negative ureteroscopy (URS) can be considered as an unnecessary procedure with medico-legal consequences, this avoids radiation from repeat CT scan and sometimes may be the only way to reassure patients with ongoing symptoms. We wanted to analyze our predictors and results of negative URS for treatment of ureteric stones. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between March 2012 and August 2018, data on consecutive patients with ureteric stones undergoing a primary URS (without a pre-operative stent) were prospectively collected for patient demographics and outcomes. Comparison was done for patients with diagnostic and therapeutic primary URS for ureteric stones. Patients with renal stones were excluded from the study. RESULTS: A total of 270 patients underwent URS for ureteric stones during the study period of which 35 (13%) had a negative diagnostic URS. The patients who had negative URS were younger (p = 0.001), had smaller stones (p < 0.001), and more stones located in the distal ureter or vesico-ureteric junction (VUJ; p= 0.036). None of the patients who underwent negative URS had a postoperative stent inserted or any complications. CONCLUSION: Although the rates of negative URS should be as low as possible, it seems to be safe and reassures patients with on-going symptoms. Based on our data, patients with small distal ureteric or VUJ stones should undergo a repeat imaging to avoid this unnecessary procedure. Informed consent, patient counseling, and appropriate up-to-date imaging seem to be key to minimizing negative diagnostic URS.


Subject(s)
Ureteral Calculi/surgery , Ureteroscopy , Adult , Aged , Female , Forecasting , Hospitals, University , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...