ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND/AIM: Aortic stenosis (AS) is the most common valvular heart disease in elderly people, with rather poor prognosis in symptomatic patients. Surgical valve replacement is the therapy of choice, but a significant number of patients cannot undergo surgical procedure. We presented initial experience of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) performed in Catheterization Laboratory of the Clinic for Cardiology, Clinical Center of Serbia. METHODS: The procedures were performed in 5 patients (mean age 76 ± 6 years, 2 males, 3 female) with severe and symptomatic AS with contraindication to surgery or high surgical risk. The decision to perform TAVI was made by the heart team. Pre-procedure screening included detailed clinical and echocardiographic evaluation, coronary angiography and computed tomography scan. In all the patients we implanted a self-expandable aortic valve (Core Valve, Medtronic, USA). Six months follow-up was available for all the patients. RESULTS: All interventions were successfully performed without significant periprocedural complications. Immediate hemodynamic improvement was obtained in all the patients (peak gradient 94.2 ± 27.6 to 17.6 ± 5.2 mmHg, p < 0.001, mean pressure gradient 52.8 ± 14.5 to 8.0 ± 2.1 mmHg, p < 0.001). None of the patients developed heart block, stroke, vascular complication or significant aortic regurgitation. After 6 months, the survival was 100% with New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional improvement in all the patients. CONCLUSION: This successful initial experience provides a solid basis to treat larger number of patients with symptomatic AS and high surgical risk who are left untreated.
Subject(s)
Aortic Valve Stenosis , Aortic Valve/surgery , Bioprosthesis , Heart Valve Prosthesis , Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement/methods , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Aortic Valve Stenosis/diagnosis , Aortic Valve Stenosis/surgery , Coronary Angiography/methods , Echocardiography/methods , Female , Humans , Male , Prosthesis Design , Risk Adjustment , Serbia , Severity of Illness Index , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
Ensuring and enforcing human rights in patient care are important to promote health and to provide quality and appropriate healthcare services. Therefore, continued medical education (CME) is essential for healthcare professionals to utilize their sphere of influence to affect change in healthcare practice. A total of 123 participants attended three CME courses. Course topics covered: (i) the areas of human rights and healthcare, (ii) rights, obligations and responsibilities of healthcare professionals in relation to human rights and the rights of patients, (iii) healthcare of vulnerable groups and (iv) access to essential medical services. Evaluation of the CME courses involved two components: evaluation of participants' performance and the participants' evaluation of the teaching process. The participants were assessed at the beginning and end of each course. Each of the courses was evaluated by the participants through a questionnaire distributed at the end of each course. Descriptive statistics was used for data interpretation. Knowledge of the healthcare professionals improved at the end of all the three courses. The participants assessed several aspects of the courses, including the course topics, educational methods, the course methods, organization, duration and dynamics as well as the physical environment and the technical facilities of the course, and rated each very highly. Our results corroborate the importance and necessity of courses to heighten awareness of the state of current healthcare and human rights issues to increase the involvement of healthcare professionals both locally and globally.
Subject(s)
Attitude of Health Personnel , Health Personnel/education , Health Personnel/psychology , Human Rights/education , Adult , Delivery of Health Care , Education, Medical, Continuing/methods , Female , Health Services Accessibility , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Rights , Program Evaluation , Schools, Medical , Serbia , Surveys and Questionnaires , Young AdultABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: This study was undertaken to examine the short-term responses of patients with ischemic heart disease to life-threatening events such as war. METHODS: This retrospective study included 75 persons with ischemic heart disease who were admitted to the Cardiac policlinic for a control check-up immediately after the suspension of air raids. Two-thirds of them were male (average age 62 +/- 10). Data were obtained using a specially conceived questionnaire based on recall. RESULTS: Almost 40% of patients estimated that they were very anxious the week before the attacks began, but the anxiety decreased after the beginning of the air raids. Frequency of anginal pains increased after the start of the air raids, but the difference was not statisticaly significant. The intensity of pains drastically increased in the first week of war. Consequently, the average number of pain killers consumed increased from the week before the attacks to the first week of the attacks, and it reached the highest value the week after the suspension of the attacks (1.39, 1.87, and 3.02 pain pills per week, respectively). The average weekly number of medications was 3.50 in the week prior to the air raids, increased to 5.05 during the first week of air raids, and rose to 6.06 in the week after the suspension. CONCLUSION: The adjustment on the psychological level was rapid but physical symptoms increased. This implies that physical adaptation to stress could be slower, or that the stress of the war provoked permanent changes in physical status.
