ABSTRACT
Dysregulated cell growth or differentiation due to misexpression of developmental critical factors seems to be a decisive event in oncogenesis. As osteosarcomas are histologically defined by malignant osteoblasts producing an osteoid component, we prospected in pediatric osteosarcomas treated with OS94 protocol the genomic status of several genes implied in ossification processes. In 91 osteosarcoma cases, we focused on the analysis of the fibroblast growth factor receptors (FGFRs) TWIST, APC, and MET by allelotyping, real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction, gene sequencing, and protein polymorphism study. Our study supports the frequent role of TWIST, APC, and MET as osteosarcoma markers (50%, 62%, and 50%, respectively). TWIST and MET were mainly found to be deleted, and no additional APC mutation was identified. Surprisingly, FGFRs are abnormal in only < 30%. Most of these factors and their abnormalities seem to be linked more or less to one clinical subgroup, but the most significant correlation is the link of MET, TWIST, and APC abnormalities to a worse outcome and their combination within abnormal tumors. A wider cohort is mandatory to define more robust molecular conclusions, but these results are to be considered as the beginning of a more accurate basis for diagnosis, in search of targeted therapies, and to further characterize prognostic markers.
Subject(s)
Blood Coagulation Factors/physiology , Bone Neoplasms/etiology , Bone Neoplasms/metabolism , Nuclear Proteins/physiology , Osteogenesis/physiology , Osteosarcoma/etiology , Osteosarcoma/metabolism , Proto-Oncogene Proteins/physiology , Receptors, Cell Surface/physiology , Receptors, Growth Factor/physiology , Twist-Related Protein 1/physiology , Child , Humans , Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-metABSTRACT
In our previous study, a frequent rearrangement at 4q12 has been identified by allelotyping in our large and homogeneous population of pediatric osteosarcomas and it was significantly linked to c-kit protein overexpression. To confirm and understand the involvement of KIT in this tumor, the next step of the study was designed to detect the potential mutations of KIT gene by sequencing the frequently mutated exons 6, 8, 10, 11, 13, 17 and 21 and, in case of unmutated samples, to confirm the genomic amplifications of the wild-type receptor by real-time quantitative PCR (QPCR). A new microsatellite and QPCR targeting PDGFRA was also added to check the accuracy of the 4q11-12 locus. These techniques were performed in 74 pediatric high-grade osteosarcomas treated with the OS94 protocol. Surprisingly, no mutations were found, but, only DNA amplification of KIT gene in the entire population. PDGFRA gene QPCR revealed an unexpected result of predominant deletions in the rearranged tumors. All these results confirm the major role of the 4q11-12 locus and specifically the involvement of c-kit wild-type receptor overexpression in pediatric osteosarcomas and leads us to believe that inhibitors targeting this receptor could have a therapeutic effect in a selected group of patients.
Subject(s)
Bone Neoplasms/genetics , Osteosarcoma/genetics , Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-kit/genetics , Adolescent , Adult , Base Sequence , Bone Neoplasms/drug therapy , Child , Child, Preschool , Chromosomes, Human, Pair 4 , DNA Primers , Female , Humans , Male , Osteosarcoma/drug therapy , Polymerase Chain Reaction , Receptors, Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor/geneticsABSTRACT
Viral infection is an important cause of morbidity and mortality in the post-allograft period. Recently, a new therapeutic approach was developed in post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) induced by Epstein-Barr virus (EBV): the anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody or rituximab. We performed a single-center study on the treatment effectiveness of rituximab in three EBV-induced PTLD and evaluated biologic data, such as T and B lymphocytes count, during PTLD development and treatment. Before PTLD treatment, blood cell profile showed a severe T lymphopenia with a progressive increase of CD8+ cells and B lymphopenia. Secondly, during treatment, there appeared a T response, as in primary EBV, and a regressive B lymphopenia.
