ABSTRACT
Pacemakers have been accessible for six decades, and clearly defined criteria for pacemaker implantation have been established. Within the contemporary clinical practice, two dependable pacing platforms exist leadless pacemakers and transvenous pacemakers. The aim of this meta-analysis is to compare the safety of leadless pacemakers to transvenous pacemakers. This meta-analysis adhered to the guidelines outlined in the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 framework. A comprehensive and systematic search was conducted across various databases including Scopus, Cochrane Library, and EMBASE, spanning from inception to August 15, 2023. The primary outcomes assessed in this meta-analysis were total complications, all-cause mortality, and device-related complications. Furthermore, secondary outcomes evaluated encompassed the need for reintervention, occurrences of pneumothorax, pericardial effusion, endocarditis, hemothorax, and hematoma. Total 17 studies were included in this meta-analysis. The findings of this study showed that patients with leadless pacemakers had a lower risk of total complications, device-related complications, pneumothorax, and endocarditis. The risk of reintervention was significantly lower in the leadless pacemaker group. However, compared to a transvenous pacemaker, the risk of pericardial effusion was significantly higher in the leadless pacemaker group. It is important to acknowledge the limitations arising from the lack of extensive long-term follow-up data for leadless pacemakers. As technology evolves, continued research will be essential in uncovering the full spectrum of prolonged complications associated with these devices.
ABSTRACT
Neoplasms of the small bowel are relatively rare, with less than 5% occurrence among other GI cases. Primary adenocarcinoma, an aggressive sub-type of small bowel cancers, usually presents with vague blood loss and abdominal pain symptoms, causing a delayed diagnosis at an advanced stage of the disease and a poor prognosis. The preferable treatment of choice is surgical resection with chemotherapy, which has shown to have survival benefits. Here we present a case of a 66-year-old male patient with persistent iron deficiency anemia requiring multiple blood transfusions and an unexplained weight loss. A series of diagnostic tests, including upper and lower GI endoscopy, Tc-99 RBC scintigraphy, barium follow-through, CT scans, bone marrow biopsy, esophagogastroduodenoscopy and colonoscopy were inconclusive. He was later diagnosed with a small bowel adenocarcinoma on exploratory laparotomy and surgically treated. Adjuvant chemotherapy was also started. Our case report highlights the course of SBA presenting in an unusual way which was challenging to diagnose with the standard investigations to help physicians/surgeons suspect it at an early stage in the future. This may save patients and help avoid delayed diagnosis or misdiagnosis, especially in patients with an unusual presentation like our patient who presented only with iron deficiency anemia.
