Effect of seasonal variation on the peak presentation of slipped capital femoral epiphysis. A comparison of children in Johannesburg, South Africa and London, UK.

Variation exists in the peak presentation of slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE). The objective of this study was to compare two cohorts of children (South Africa and the UK) and explore similarities and differences regarding demographic and epidemiological features, incidence and seasonal variation in peak presentation. Patients presenting with SCFE at one of two hospitals were included in the study. A retrospective cohort was collected from hospital records. The following factors were recorded: duration of symptoms, chronicity, stability, seasonality, severity and prophylactic pinning. A total of 137 patients were included in the study - 70 patients (80 hips) from South Africa and 67 patients (73 hips) from the UK. Both sites recorded more than 50% incidence of a chronic slip. There was higher delay to presentation in the UK compared with South Africa (90 vs 60 days, P = 0.0262). The UK population were more skeletally mature (32.8% open triradiate cartilage) compared with the South Africa population (64.9% open triradiate cartilage). In both populations, the most common season of symptom onset was summer. In the UK, the most common season of symptom presentation was in autumn compared with summer in South Africa. This study found significant differences in the two countries, including a more skeletally mature population in the UK. Both cohorts showed seasonal variation in peak incidence, but there was more seasonal variation in peak incidence in the UK - in the summer for onset of symptoms and autumn months for time of presentation.

Simulation in the early management of gastroschisis.

AIM: Our aim was to design, create, and validate a simulator model and simulation scenario for the early management of gastroschisis. METHODS: Candidates of varying surgical experience had 1 attempt on an abdominal wall defect simulator and were scored for 4 different aspects: resuscitation of the neonate, application of a silo by both a global rating scale and a procedure-specific checklist, and nontechnical skills (scored by Non-Technical Skills scale). Surgical trainees subsequently received a focused teaching module on the resuscitative management and the surgical decision-making process, including bowel protection methods. Trainees then had a second attempt, which was objectively analyzed for improvement. RESULTS: Candidates attempted the simulation and were assessed, looking for construct validity. There was a statistically significant difference between candidate experience levels for all aspects of the simulation (resuscitation, global rating scale, procedure-specific checklist, and nontechnical skills) calculated using analysis of variance. Feedback forms gave us face validity, with a mean adjusted score of 8.3/10 for realism. After teaching the module, there was a statistically significant improvement (P < 0.05) of 20% for technical skills and 10% for nontechnical skills, which is comparable with similar controlled studies. CONCLUSIONS: We showed that creating and running a simulation scenario for the early management of gastroschisis is a feasible and useful tool for training and assessment. The simulation may also be able to discriminate between experience levels and could be used as a teaching aid to improve a surgeon's technical and nontechnical skills.