Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
1.
Semin Arthritis Rheum ; 57: 152113, 2022 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36335682

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To assess predicting factors that might influence systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) disease activity in women in an extended follow-up period of two years after giving birth with clinical assessments every three months. METHODS: The study was design as an international retrospective study, enrolling 119 women with a first birth and with a two years follow-up. RESULTS: Joint involvement was present in 80% of patients, acute cutaneous in 64%, haematological in 54%, renal in 41% and 75% of patients were positive for anti-dsDNA. The mean SLE disease activity index 2000 (SLEDAI-2K) at diagnosis was 13.5±6.8 and at first birth was 2.8±4.4. At follow-up, 51.3% of patients had at least one flare after a mean time after birth of 9±6.3 months (mean flare per patient 0.94±1.1). The most frequent flare manifestations were joint involvement (48%), renal (33%), cutaneous (28%) and haematologic (20%). Patients with remission of disease (SLEDAI-2K=0; no clinical or laboratory manifestations of SLE) at conception had significantly lower rates of flares (18/49-37% vs. 43/70-61%; p=0.008). Patients who experienced a flare during pregnancy (17 patients) had higher rates of flares during follow-up (76% vs. 47%; p=0.019), lower time for first flare (4.4±2.3 months vs. 10.3±6.5; p<0.001), lower rate of remission of disease at conception (12% vs. 46%; p<0.001), lower rates of SLEDAI-2K at conception (5.9±5.6 vs. 2.3±4; p<0.001) and lower rates of exclusive breastfeeding (24% vs. 57%: p=0.009). Results were confirmed after performing multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION: Remission at conception can influence SLE disease positively, even at long-term. Planned pregnancy counseling is fundamental when managing SLE patients.


Subject(s)
Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic , Female , Pregnancy , Humans , Follow-Up Studies , Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic/complications , Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic/diagnosis , Retrospective Studies , Symptom Flare Up , Kidney
2.
J Pers Med ; 12(7)2022 Jul 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35887681

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Asthma, along with inhaled steroids, was initially considered a risk factor for worse clinical outcomes in COVID-19. This was related to the higher morbidity observed in asthma patients during previous viral outbreaks. This retrospective study aimed at evaluating the prevalence of asthma among patients admitted due to SARS-CoV-2 infection as well as the impact of inhaled therapies on their outcomes. Furthermore, a comparison between patients with asthma, COPD and the general population was made. Methods: All COVID-19 inpatients were recruited between February and July 2020 from four large hospitals in Northwest Italy. Data concerning medical history, the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) and the hospital stay, including length, drugs and COVID-19 complications (respiratory failure, lung involvement, and the need for respiratory support) were collected, as well as the type of discharge. Results: patients with asthma required high-flow oxygen therapy (33.3 vs. 14.3%, p = 0.001) and invasive mechanical ventilation (17.9 vs. 9.5%, p = 0.048) more frequently when compared to the general population, but no other difference was observed. Moreover, asthma patients were generally younger than patients with COPD (59.2 vs. 76.8 years, p < 0.001), they showed both a lower mortality rate (15.4 vs. 39.4%, p < 0.001) and a lower CCI (3.4 vs. 6.2, p < 0.001). Patients with asthma in regular therapy with ICS at home had significantly shorter hospital stay compared to those with no treatments (25.2 vs. 11.3 days, p = 0.024). Discussion: Our study showed that asthma is not associated with worse outcomes of COVID-19, despite the higher need for respiratory support compared with the general population, while the use of ICS allowed for a shorter hospital stay. In addition, the comparison of asthma with COPD patients confirmed the greater frailty of the latter, according to their multiple comorbidities.

3.
Front Immunol ; 12: 687534, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34220842

ABSTRACT

The clinical significance of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) in the context of infections has attracted attention since their first discovery in patients with syphilis. In fact, the recognition of aPL in patients with infections has been described in parallel to the understating of the syndrome. Since the first description of aPL-positive tests in three patients with COVID-19 diagnosed in January 2020 in Wuhan, China, a large number of studies took part in the ongoing debate on SARS-2-Cov 2 induced coagulopathy, and many following reports speculated a potential role for aPL. In order to get further insights on the effective role of detectable aPL in the pro-thrombotic status observed in COVID-19 patients, we performed an observational age-sex controlled study to compare the aPL profile of hospitalized patients with COVID with those observed in a) patients with thrombotic APS and b) patients with cultural/serologically-proved infections. Our data showed positive aPL testing in about half of the patients (53%) with COVID-19 and patients with other viral/bacterial infections (49%). However, aPL profile was different when comparing patients with overt APS and patients with aPL detected in the contest of infections. Caution is therefore required in the interpretation and generalization of the role of aPL s in the management of patients with COVID-19. Before introducing aPL testing as a part of the routine testing in patients with COVID-19, larger well-designed clinical studies are required. While the pro-thrombotic status in patients with COVID-19 is now unquestionable, different mechanisms other than aPL should be further investigated.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Antiphospholipid/blood , Antiphospholipid Syndrome/pathology , Bacterial Infections/pathology , COVID-19/pathology , Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation/pathology , Virus Diseases/pathology , Aged , Antibodies, Antiphospholipid/immunology , Antiphospholipid Syndrome/complications , Antiphospholipid Syndrome/immunology , Bacterial Infections/complications , COVID-19/complications , COVID-19/immunology , Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation/virology , Female , Humans , Male , SARS-CoV-2/immunology , Virus Diseases/complications
4.
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) ; 73(12): 1804-1808, 2021 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32702197

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to investigate the impact of applying the 2019 European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology (EULAR)/American College of Rheumatology (ACR) classification criteria for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) in a previously described cohort of women with undifferentiated connective tissue disease (UCTD). METHODS: This study included 133 women with UCTD. At the time of inclusion into the study, none of the patients met any classification criteria for other defined systemic connective tissue disease. RESULTS: When applying the 2019 EULAR/ACR classification criteria to the cohort, 22 patients (17%) fulfilled the classification criteria for SLE. Patients classified as having SLE had significantly higher frequencies of mucocutaneous manifestations (23% versus 5%; P = 0.007), arthritis (59% versus 17%; P < 0.001), isolated urine abnormalities (18% versus 1%; P < 0.001), and highly specific antibodies (50% versus 15%; P < 0.001) compared to the other patients with UCTD. At follow-up, these patients were statistically significantly more likely to also meet the 1997 ACR revised SLE criteria and the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics (SLICC) criteria (18.2% versus 1.8%; P < 0.001) compared to the other UCTD patients. Patients who were diagnosed as having SLE according to the ACR 1997 update of the SLE revised criteria and the SLICC criteria during the follow-up scored higher on outcome measures when classified as having SLE according to the new 2019 EULAR/ACR classification criteria when compared to the other patients with UCTD (mean ± SD score 8.3 ± 3.7 versus 4.5 ± 4; P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: When applying the 2019 EULAR/ACR criteria for SLE in a cohort of patients with UCTD, we observed that in up to 17% of cases the original classification could be challenged. New implementation will help to identify earlier patients at higher risk of developing more severe CTD manifestations.


Subject(s)
Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic/classification , Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic/diagnosis , Rheumatology/standards , Adult , Aged , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Undifferentiated Connective Tissue Diseases/classification
5.
Rheumatology (Oxford) ; 59(9): 2412-2418, 2020 09 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31943123

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To investigate fetal/perinatal and maternal outcomes from a large multicentre cohort of women diagnosed with UCTD. METHODS: This multicentre retrospective cohort study describes the outcomes of 224 pregnancies in 133 consecutive women with a diagnosis of UCTD, positive for ANA and aged <45 years old at study inclusion. RESULTS: Of the 224 pregnancies analysed, 177 (79%) resulted in live births, 45 (20.1%) in miscarriages (defined as pregnancy loss before 12 weeks' gestation), 2 (0.9%) in stillbirths (pregnancy loss after 20 weeks' gestation) and 6 (2.7%) cases showed intrauterine growth restriction. Miscarriages and stillbirths were strongly associated with the presence of aPL and ENA antibodies (P < 0.05). Maternal pregnancy complications were as follows: 5 (2.2%) cases developed pre-eclampsia, 11 (4.9%) cases gestational hypertension and 12 (5.4%) cases gestational diabetes. Joint involvement represented the most frequent clinical manifestation of the cohort (57.9%), followed by RP (40.6%), photosensitivity (32.3%) and haematological manifestations (27.1%). The rate of disease evolution of our cohort from a diagnosis of UCTD to a diagnosis of definite CTD was 12% within a mean time of 5.3 ± 2.8 years. With a total follow-up after first pregnancy of 1417 patient-years, we observed the evolution to a defined CTD in one out of every 88 patient- years. CONCLUSION: In our multicentre cohort, women with UCTD had a live birth rate of 79%. Women with UCTD should be referred to specialist follow-up when planning a pregnancy. ENA profiling and aPL testing should be mandatory in this setting, and further therapeutic approaches and management should be planned accordingly.


Subject(s)
Autoantibodies/blood , Pregnancy Complications/etiology , Pregnancy Outcome/epidemiology , Undifferentiated Connective Tissue Diseases/complications , Abortion, Spontaneous/epidemiology , Abortion, Spontaneous/etiology , Adult , Antibodies, Antinuclear/blood , Antibodies, Antinuclear/immunology , Antibodies, Antiphospholipid/blood , Antibodies, Antiphospholipid/immunology , Autoantibodies/immunology , Female , Fetal Growth Retardation/epidemiology , Fetal Growth Retardation/etiology , Humans , Live Birth/epidemiology , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Complications/blood , Pregnancy Complications/immunology , Retrospective Studies , Stillbirth/epidemiology , Undifferentiated Connective Tissue Diseases/blood , Undifferentiated Connective Tissue Diseases/immunology
6.
Front Cardiovasc Med ; 6: 11, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30873413

ABSTRACT

Objective: Neonatal Lupus (NL) is a rare syndrome caused by placental transfer of maternal anti-SSA/Ro and anti-La/SSB autoantibodies to the fetus. The rarity of this condition requires the establishment of multidisciplinary registries in order to improve our knowledge. Method: Inclusion criteria in this retrospective study were the maternal confirmed positivity for anti-SSA/Ro and/or anti-SSB/La antibodies, and the presence of II or III degree congenital heart block (CHB) in utero or neonatal period (up to 27 days after birth). Result: Eighty-nine cases of CHB were observed in 85 women with 88 pregnancies that occurred between 1969 and 2017. CHB was mostly detected in utero (84 cases, 94.2%), while five cases were observed in the neonatal period. A permanent pacemaker was implanted in 51 of 73 children born alive (69.8), whereas global mortality rate was 25.8% (23 cases): 16 in utero, five perinatal, and two during childhood. By univariate analysis, factors associated with fetal death were pleural effusion (p = 0.005, OR > 100; CI 95% 2.88->100 and hydrops (p = 0.003, OR = 14.09; CI 95% 2.01-122). Fluorinated steroids (FS) were administered in 71.4% pregnancies, and its use was not associated with better survival. Some centers treated all cases with fluorinated steroids and some centers did not treat any case. CHB was initially incomplete in 24 fetuses, and of them five cases of II degree block reverted to a lower degree block after treatments. Recurrence rate in subsequent pregnancies was 17.6% (3 out of 17). A prophylactic treatment was introduced in 10 of these 16 subsequent (58.8%) pregnancies, mostly with FS or high dose intravenous immunoglobulins. Conclusion: This is the first report from the Italian Registry of neonatal lupus/CHB. The live birth rate was nearly 80%, with nearly two thirds of the children requiring the implantation of a pacemaker. The management of fetuses diagnosed with CHB was heterogeneous across Italian Centers. The registry at present is mainly rheumatological, but involvement of pediatric cardiologists and gynecologists is planned.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...