Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 24
Filter
1.
Case Rep Dermatol ; 16(1): 133-139, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38831934

ABSTRACT

Introduction: The development of new and changing melanocytic lesions has been increasingly reported as an adverse dermatologic toxicity of BRAF inhibitor therapy. Melanocytic lesions and melanomas induced by BRAF inhibitor therapy that lack BRAF V600E expression have been less commonly described. One mechanism that has been proposed for the development of BRAF inhibitor-induced melanocytic lesions, including those lacking BRAF V600E expression, is the paradoxical activation of the MAPK signaling pathway in BRAF wild-type (BRAFWT) cells. Case Presentation: Herein, we report a rare case of a 39-year-old woman who developed numerous BRAF V600E-negative eruptive melanocytic nevi following encorafenib, cetuximab, and binimetinib combination therapy, the current standard of care for the treatment of BRAF-mutant metastatic colorectal cancer. Conclusion: Patients treated with BRAF inhibitors, with or without related combination therapies, who develop BRAFWT melanocytic lesions are at risk for developing both dysplastic nevi and melanoma, thereby warranting baseline dermatoscopic evaluation prior to the initiation of therapy as well as regular follow-up during and after treatment.

2.
J Immunother Cancer ; 12(4)2024 Apr 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38599660

ABSTRACT

With an increasing number of patients eligible for immune checkpoint inhibitors, the incidence of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) is on the rise. Dermatologic immune-related adverse events (D-irAEs) are the most common and earliest to manifest, often with important downstream consequences for the patient. Current guidelines lack clarity in terms of diagnostic criteria for D-irAEs. The goal of this project is to better define D-irAE for the purposes of identification, diagnosis, and future study of this important group of diseases.The objectives of this project were to develop consensus guidance for an approach to D-irAEs including disease definitions and severity grading. Knowing that consensus among oncologists, dermatologists, and irAE subspecialists would be critical for usability, we formed a Dermatologic irAE Disease Definition Panel. The panel was composed of 34 experts, including oncologists, dermatologists, a rheumatologist, and an allergist/immunologist from 22 institutions across the USA and internationally. A modified Delphi consensus process was used, with two rounds of anonymous ratings by panelists and two virtual meetings to discuss areas of controversy. Panelists rated content for usability, appropriateness, and accuracy on 9-point scales in electronic surveys and provided free text comments. A working group aggregated survey responses and incorporated them into revised definitions. Consensus was based on numeric ratings using the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method with prespecified definitions.Following revisions based on panelist feedback, all items received consensus in the second round of ratings. Consensus definitions were achieved for 10 core D-irAE diagnoses: ICI-vitiligo, ICI-lichen planus, ICI-psoriasis, ICI-exanthem, ICI-bullous pemphigoid, ICI-Grover's, ICI-eczematous, ICI-eruptive atypical squamous proliferation, ICI-pruritus without rash, and ICI-erosive mucocutaneous. A standard evaluation for D-irAE was also found to reach consensus, with disease-specific exceptions detailed when necessary. Each disorder's description includes further details on disease subtypes, symptoms, supportive exam findings, and three levels of diagnostic certainty (definite, probable, and possible).These consensus-driven disease definitions standardize D-irAE classification in a useable framework for multiple disciplines and will be the foundation for future work. Given consensus on their accuracy and usability from a representative panel group, we anticipate that they can be used broadly across clinical and research settings.


Subject(s)
Exanthema , Oncologists , Humans , Consensus , Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors/adverse effects , Radioimmunotherapy
3.
Pediatr Dermatol ; 40(5): 829-834, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37439382

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Dermatologists and other providers play essential roles in managing the dermatologic care of pediatric patients. This study aims to identify patterns and elucidate factors associated with receiving dermatologic care in the United States. METHODS: The National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NAMCS) was used to identify pediatric patients with dermatologic diagnoses from 2009 to 2015. Clinical and demographic information were evaluated, and visit diagnoses were stratified based on provider type (dermatologists vs. non-dermatologists). Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to identify key predictors of outpatient dermatology care for pediatric patients. National estimates of diagnoses were procured using weights provided within the NAMCS database to project disease incidence. RESULTS: A total of 85,217,557 pediatric patients (survey-weighted) were observed during the study period. Of the sampled patients, 29.3% were evaluated by dermatologists, while 70.7% were seen by non-dermatology providers. Atopic dermatitis was the most common diagnosis encountered by dermatologists in ages 0-3 years, while unspecified contact dermatitis was the most common diagnosis reported by non-dermatologists in all age groups. On multivariable logistic regression, ≥1 year of age, Caucasian race, private insurance versus Medicaid, residence in a metropolitan area, referral from another provider, and longer appointment wait time were associated with an increased likelihood of being evaluated by a dermatologist compared to a non-dermatologist. CONCLUSIONS: Non-dermatologists are responsible for the majority of pediatric dermatologic care. For pediatric patients, health disparities by race, insurance status, and rurality present significant challenges to being evaluated by a dermatologist.


Subject(s)
Dermatitis, Atopic , Dermatitis, Contact , Dermatology , Skin Diseases , Humans , Child , United States/epidemiology , Ambulatory Care , Health Care Surveys , Skin Diseases/diagnosis , Skin Diseases/epidemiology , Skin Diseases/therapy , White
4.
Dermatol Online J ; 27(8)2021 Aug 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34755954

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Although hematogenous malignancy is a risk factor for poorer prognosis in Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC), current guidelines make no specific recommendations for surveillance. OBJECTIVE: We aim to characterize MCC-specific mortality compared to other causes of death for patients with hematologic malignancy in MCC, which will guide workup and surveillance strategies. METHODS: The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-18 registry was queried for MCC patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) or non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). RESULTS: Of 8519 patients with MCC, 146 (1.7%) had CLL and 234 (2.8%) had NHL. Chronic lymphocytic leukemia patients had 5-year cumulative incidence of MCC-specific mortality of 38.4% versus 28.4% in patients without CLL/NHL. For both cohorts, oncologic risk was highest within the first three years of diagnosis with competing risks favored thereafter. On competing risk regression, a history of CLL trended toward statistical significance with poorer MCC-specific mortality (subdistribution hazard ratio: 1.33, 95% CI: 0.963-1.834, P=0.084), while NHL was not prognostic. CONCLUSIONS: Merkel cell carcinoma patients with CLL may benefit from more aggressive initial management. Surveillance for similar length in CLL patients with MCC may be appropriate; this co-morbidity did not affect the timeframe by which the risk of competing causes of death exceeded oncologic risks.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Merkel Cell/complications , Leukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-Cell/complications , Lymphoma, Non-Hodgkin/complications , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Analysis of Variance , Carcinoma, Merkel Cell/therapy , Female , Humans , Male , Regression Analysis , Risk Assessment , SEER Program , Survival Analysis
5.
Pediatr Dermatol ; 38(2): 449-454, 2021 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33336810

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Dermatologic conditions comprise a significant number of emergency department visits in the pediatric population in the United States. Understanding key predictors of emergency department utilization for dermatologic conditions is important to reduce inappropriate use. METHODS: A total of 44 554 sampled patient emergency department visits, consisting of patients less than 18 years of age, were collected from the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey between 2009 to 2015. ICD-9 codes were used to define dermatologic conditions versus non-dermatologic conditions with univariate and multivariate analyses used to identify factors significantly correlated with dermatologic emergency department utilization. RESULTS: A total of 13 681 691 pediatric dermatologic emergency department visits (weighted) were evaluated over the seven-year period, representing 6.4% of total pediatric emergency department visits. The most common dermatologic diagnosis was cellulitis (25.6% of visits). The majority of patients were five years old or younger (54.4%). Patients with primary dermatologic conditions were more likely to be triaged as non-urgent (16.7%) or semi-urgent (45.8%) than patients without dermatologic conditions. Only 2.1% of patients with dermatologic conditions required further observation or admission. On further regression modeling, age ≤ 5, semi-urgent or non-urgent acuity, Medicaid insurance, and residence in the Northeastern or Midwestern United States were significantly associated with presentation to the emergency department with a dermatologic condition when compared to non-dermatologic condition. CONCLUSIONS: Dermatologic conditions continue to comprise a significant number of ED visits in the pediatric population. Increased ED utilization by vulnerable pediatric populations highlights the need to better direct or provide access to outpatient dermatologic care.


Subject(s)
Emergency Service, Hospital , Medicaid , Ambulatory Care , Child , Child, Preschool , Health Care Surveys , Hospitalization , Humans , United States/epidemiology
11.
Dermatol Ther ; 34(1): e14461, 2021 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33112465

ABSTRACT

Tyrosine kinase inhibitors are a class of targeted anticancer drugs that inhibit cancer cell proliferation by inactivating proteins involved in signal transduction cascades. Various cutaneous adverse events have been observed after tyrosine kinase inhibitor administration, including Sweet syndrome. We queried the PubMed database to identify 14 cases of Sweet syndrome thought to be secondary to tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Tyrosine kinase inhibitor-induced Sweet syndrome had a median of 2 months latency following drug administration. All cases but one had morphologic features classic for Sweet syndrome (erythematous and tender papules, plaques, or nodules). All cases also had classic histopathologic findings (dermal neutrophilic infiltrate without vasculitis or necrosis). Using diagnostic criteria for drug-induced Sweet syndrome and the Naranjo Drug Reaction Probability Scale for a drug-induced cutaneous eruption, we found that six cases favored a drug-induced etiology over malignancy, two cases favored a malignancy-associated Sweet syndrome, and the remaining eight met drug-induced Sweet syndrome criteria but had low Naranjo scores. Nine cases resulted in medication discontinuation, while five cases continued anticancer therapy and were treated only with corticosteroids with quick resolution of skin lesions. Dermatologists should be aware of this adverse cutaneous reaction to tyrosine kinase inhibitors and should treat on a case-by-case basis, though limited evidence in this review suggests that oncologic therapy may safely be continued with prompt corticosteroid treatment.


Subject(s)
Drug Eruptions , Neoplasms , Sweet Syndrome , Drug Eruptions/diagnosis , Drug Eruptions/etiology , Humans , Neoplasms/drug therapy , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/adverse effects , Skin , Sweet Syndrome/chemically induced , Sweet Syndrome/diagnosis
12.
Dermatol Ther ; 33(6): e14171, 2020 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32799412

ABSTRACT

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) improve the ability of the immune system to target cancer cells by blocking signaling through either the cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 (CTLA-4), programmed cell death (PD-1) receptor, or its ligand (PD-L1). They have been found to cause a variety of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) including a form of nonscarring alopecia that resembles alopecia areata (AA) in presentation and histology. Clinical features of ICI-induced AA are poorly described. We queried the Pubmed database for cases of AA secondary to ICI use reporting on extent of hair loss, treatments attempted, alopecia outcome, and time of follow-up with 13 cases identified. Although most patients had localized hair loss with subsequent regrowth, four of them experienced extensive and persistent AA, lasting up to a year. All but one patient continued ICI after the onset of hair loss. Many used topical corticosteroids with varying outcomes. Possible prognostic factors for severe and persistent disease may include young age and male sex. However, the low number of reported cases limits the generalizability of these findings. Tumor response was positive in every case of immune-induced AA where it was reported. Further investigation will be needed to better characterize clinical features of this irAE, risk factors for persistent disease, and determine its optimal management.


Subject(s)
Alopecia Areata , Neoplasms , Alopecia Areata/chemically induced , Alopecia Areata/diagnosis , Databases, Factual , Humans , Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors , Male , Neoplasms/drug therapy , Programmed Cell Death 1 Receptor
13.
JAMA Dermatol ; 156(10): 1079-1085, 2020 10 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32609305

ABSTRACT

Importance: Up to 90% of patients treated with an epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor (EGFRi) experience cutaneous toxic effects that are negatively associated with quality of life and lead to treatment interruptions. The Skin Toxicity Evaluation Protocol With Panitumumab trial found reduced incidence of skin toxicity and quality of life impairment with preemptive use of doxycycline hyclate, topical corticosteroids, moisturizers, and sunscreen, demonstrating the benefit of prophylactic treatment for skin toxicity. Objective: To evaluate the association of a comprehensive skin toxicity program with adherence to prophylaxis guidelines for the prevention of EGFRi-associated cutaneous toxic effects. Design, Setting, and Participants: A retrospective cohort study was conducted of all adult patients receiving at least 1 dose of cetuximab at the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute in the calendar year 2012 (2 years after publication of the Skin Toxicity Evaluation Protocol With Panitumumab) or the calendar year 2017 (2 years after full implementation of the Skin Toxicities from Anticancer Therapies program). Main Outcomes and Measures: Primary outcomes were rate of preemptive rash treatment and selection of preemptive agents. Secondary outcomes were incidence of rash, rates of rescue treatments, rates of cetuximab dose changes or interruptions, and overall survival at 2 years. Results: There were 118 patients (85 men; median age, 62.4 years [range, 23.5-91.7 years]) treated with cetuximab in 2012 and 90 patients (70 men; median age, 62.5 years [range, 30.7-90.5 years]) treated with cetuximab in 2017; 11 patients (9%) in 2012 and 31 patients (34%) in 2017 were treated at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute affiliate sites. At cetuximab treatment initiation, 29 patients (25%) in 2012 and 42 patients (47%) in 2017 were prophylactically treated for skin toxicity (P < .001). From 2012 to 2017, preemptive tetracycline use (13 of 29 [45%] to 30 of 42 [71%]; P = .02) and topical corticosteroid use (2 of 29 [7%] to 24 of 42 [57%]; P < .001) increased and topical antibiotic use (23 of 29 [79%] to 18 of 42 [43%]; P = .002) decreased. There was no significant difference in incidence of rash by prophylaxis status. Patients prescribed prophylactic treatment were 94% less likely to require a first rescue treatment for rash (adjusted odds ratio, 0.06; 95% CI, 0.02-0.16; P < .001), 74% less likely to require a second rescue treatment for rash (adjusted odds ratio, 0.26; 95% CI, 0.08-0.83; P = .02), and 79% less likely to experience a cetuximab dose change or interruption (adjusted odds ratio, 0.21; 95% CI, 0.06-0.81; P = .02) than patients not prescribed prophylactic treatment, adjusting for treatment site and year. Conclusions and Relevance: Dermatologists can add value to oncology care by raising awareness of appropriate treatment options and increasing adherence to evidence-based prophylaxis protocols for EGFRi-associated rash, which is associated with decreased interventions and toxicity-associated chemotherapy interruptions.


Subject(s)
Cancer Care Facilities/statistics & numerical data , Colorectal Neoplasms/drug therapy , Drug Eruptions/prevention & control , Guideline Adherence/statistics & numerical data , Head and Neck Neoplasms/drug therapy , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/adverse effects , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cancer Care Facilities/organization & administration , Cancer Care Facilities/standards , Cetuximab/administration & dosage , Cetuximab/adverse effects , Delivery of Health Care, Integrated/organization & administration , Delivery of Health Care, Integrated/standards , Delivery of Health Care, Integrated/statistics & numerical data , Dermatology/organization & administration , Dermatology/standards , Dermatology/statistics & numerical data , Drug Eruptions/etiology , ErbB Receptors/antagonists & inhibitors , Evidence-Based Medicine/organization & administration , Evidence-Based Medicine/standards , Evidence-Based Medicine/statistics & numerical data , Female , Guideline Adherence/trends , Humans , Male , Massachusetts , Medical Oncology/organization & administration , Medical Oncology/standards , Medical Oncology/statistics & numerical data , Middle Aged , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/administration & dosage , Quality of Life , Retrospective Studies , Young Adult
14.
Int J Dermatol ; 59(6): e183-e188, 2020 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32052409

ABSTRACT

The use of checkpoint inhibitors for treatment of advanced malignancies is increasing. Rashes, pruritus, and more rarely, reactions resembling Stevens-Johnsons syndrome (SJS) or toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) may occur secondary to checkpoint inhibitors. To characterize existing literature on these reports, we queried the PubMed/MEDLINE database for cases of SJS or TEN associated with checkpoint inhibitors. We identified 18 cases of SJS or TEN-like reactions to checkpoint inhibitors in the literature. There were 12 cases of SJS-like rashes with median time to onset of 5.6 weeks (average of 8.9 weeks), of which five were delayed to week 8 or later from checkpoint inhibitor initiation. The five TEN-like reactions had a median time to onset of 4 weeks (average of 5.38 weeks), of which two were delayed to week 6 or later. SJS/TEN-like reactions to nivolumab (seven cases) had median onset time of 3 weeks, whereas five cases secondary to pembrolizumab had median onset time of 11 weeks. Seven cases in this study described prodromal rashes, which varied from localized papular rashes to generalized morbilliform rashes, prior to evolution into SJS or TEN-like patterns. SJS-like patterns generally improved well on systemic treatment/supportive care and no cases of death were identified, but mortality occurred in three of five patients with TEN-like reactions. Dermatologists should consider the possibility for unique features of SJS/TEN in response to checkpoint inhibitors. Additional studies will be necessary to further characterize SJS/TEN-like eruptions on checkpoint inhibitors and determine the optimal management of these cases.


Subject(s)
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors/adverse effects , Neoplasms/drug therapy , Stevens-Johnson Syndrome/etiology , Humans , Neoplasms/immunology , Stevens-Johnson Syndrome/therapy , Withholding Treatment
18.
Pediatr Dermatol ; 34(5): 540-546, 2017 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28884910

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) are medical emergencies. Mainstays of treatment include removal of the offending agent, supportive care, and wound care. The use of immunosuppressive agents such as corticosteroids and intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) is controversial. Some case reports and small studies report the successful use of cyclosporin A (CsA) for SJS/TEN in halting disease progression, fostering reepithelialization, and reducing mortality. OBJECTIVE: To report on the efficacy of cyclosporine A in the treatment of SJS/TEN in three pediatric patients. METHODS: We describe three pediatric patients seen at a tertiary care hospital in Boston, Massachusetts, diagnosed with SJS/TEN confirmed by skin biopsy who were successfully treated with CsA with improvements seen in time to cessation of disease progression or new lesion formation, reepithelialization, and duration of hospital stay. RESULTS: The average time cessation of disease progression or new lesion formation after CsA administration was 2.2 days (range 1.5-3 days) and average time to remission or reepithelialization was 13 days (range 10-15 days). The average length of hospital stay was 11.7 days (range 4-19 days). CONCLUSIONS: We describe three pediatric patients treated successfully with CsA and provide evidence for the use of cyclosporine in children with SJS/TEN. These results further support previous observations that CsA use for SJS/TEN produces consistently favorable outcomes. The results in this case series are limited by their observational nature. Additional trials are needed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of CsA use in children.


Subject(s)
Cyclosporine/therapeutic use , Immunosuppressive Agents/therapeutic use , Stevens-Johnson Syndrome/drug therapy , Boston , Child , Child, Preschool , Disease Progression , Female , Humans , Infant , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Male , Skin/pathology , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
20.
JAMA Dermatol ; 150(4): 380-4, 2014 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24452370

ABSTRACT

IMPORTANCE: Evidence-based treatment guidelines are not available for primary cutaneous mucinous carcinoma (PCMC). OBJECTIVE: To assess outcomes associated with surgical treatment of PCMC. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health, and Embase from 1952 to 2010. Search terms were "primary cutaneous mucinous carcinoma," "primary mucinous adenocarcinoma of the skin," "primary mucinous sweat-gland carcinoma," and "endocrine mucin-producing sweat gland carcinoma." STUDY SELECTION: Articles describing primary data on treatment (ie, case reports, case series, and cohort studies) of any patients with PCMC. A total of 116 articles were identified, with 90 of these assessed for eligibility and 87 used for final analysis. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Each case was verified to be of primary cutaneous origin by 2 observers. Histopathologic descriptions were confirmed to be consistent with PCMC. Extracted fields included age, sex, race, lesion duration, tumor diameter, method of treatment, follow-up, and whether the lesion recurred or metastasized. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Outcomes were dichotomized into good and bad depending on the presence of recurrence or metastasis during follow-up. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to determine significant factors for predicting bad outcomes. RESULTS One hundred fifty-nine cases of PCMC, of whom 54.7% were male and 77.2% were white, with mean (SD) age 63.5 (13.2) years, were analyzed. Most had been treated with traditional surgical excision (85.5%), with only 9.4% of cases treated with Mohs surgery. Older (odds ratio [OR], 0.93; P = .04) and Asian (OR, 0.02; P = .01) patients had relatively better postsurgical outcomes. Larger tumors (OR, 6.71; P = .14), those persistent for longer prior to surgery (OR, 1.02; P = .11), and those located on the trunk (OR, 103.24; P = .005) also were associated with poorer outcomes. Limitations included reliance on case report data. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Patient demographic characteristics and tumor-specific features may provide predictive information regarding the risk of postsurgical recurrence and metastasis after treatment of PCMC.


Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma, Mucinous/surgery , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/surgery , Skin Neoplasms/surgery , Adenocarcinoma, Mucinous/ethnology , Adenocarcinoma, Mucinous/secondary , Age Factors , Humans , Mohs Surgery , Neoplasm Metastasis , Skin Neoplasms/ethnology , Skin Neoplasms/pathology , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...