Anemia due to coadministration of renin-angiotensin-system inhibitors and PPARγ agonists in uncomplicated diabetic patients.

Therapy with either angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers (ACEI/ARB) or thiazolidinediones (TZD) is associated with dose-dependent decrements in hematocrit and hemoglobin levels. We aimed to investigate the impact of the coadministration of TZD and ACEI/ARB on hematocrit and hemoglobin values in uncomplicated patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and normal serum creatinine.Data from patients with type 2 diabetes currently followed, were reviewed and patients treated with ACEI/ARB and/or TZD were identified. For the purpose of this study the following 4 groups of 30 stable non-anemic diabetic patients each matched for age, gender, and BMI were formed. Group ACEI/ARB included patients on ACEI/ARB without TZD, group TZD included patients on TZD and antihypertensive agents other than ACEI/ARB, group ACEI/ARB/TZD consisted of patients on combined therapy with ACEI/ARB and TZD and the control group C included patients never exposed to ACEI/ARB or TZD. Clinical and laboratory data were collected prior to initiation of treatment and after 6 months.Neither hematocrit nor hemoglobin showed any significant change from baseline at the end of the study in group C. In both group ACEI/ARB and group TZD a small, but statistically significant reduction in hematocrit (~ 1% point) and hemoglobin levels (~ 0.3 g/dl) was seen. A greater statistically and clinically important reduction in hematocrit (~ 3% points) and hemoglobin (~ 1 g/dl) levels was observed in group ACEI/ARB/TZD. Furthermore, incident anemia at the end reached 7% in group TZD and 23% in group ACEI/ARB/TZD.Coadministration of RAS inhibitors and PPAR-γ agonists should be considered in the differential diagnosis of hematocrit lowering and anemia in uncomplicated type 2 diabetic patients with normal serum creatinine. Further studies are required to clarify the mechanism(s), the cardiovascular consequences and the cost utility of anemia workup in such patients.

Combined treatment with low-dose pravastatin and fish oil in post-renal transplantation dislipidemia.

BACKGROUND: The most common cause of post-transplant dyslipidemia is the use of corticosteroids and cyclosporin-A (CyA). The HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors have emerged as the agents of first choice in the treatment of post-transplant hyperlipidemia in combination with low fat diet. The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of combined treatment with low-dose pravastatin and fish oil in post-renal transplantation dislipidemia. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-four renal transplant patients, 15 men and 9 women aged from 30 to 60 years with stable renal function were included in this study. All patients were transplanted from living related donors and were given a stable triple immunosuppressive therapy, with methylprednisolone, azathioprine and CyA. All patients were also given a standard diet containing 1 g/kg BW protein, reducing the daily fat to less than 30%, and maintaining at least a 1:1 ratio of saturated to polyunsaturated (or monounsaturated) fats. A dosage of 20 mg pravastatin (pravachol) and 1 g of fish oil (prolipid) were added to the diet after dinner, according to our protocol. Blood samples were taken after each study period for total cholesterol, LDL-cholesterol, triglycerides, Apo A(1), Apo B, Lp(a), creatinine, CPK and fibrinogen determination. RESULTS: At the end of the therapeutic protocol with pravastatin a significant reduction (p < 0.02) of total and LDL-cholesterol was observed, but no significant change in triglycerides, HDL, Lp(a), Apo A(1), Apo B and fibrinogen was shown. At the end of the therapeutic protocol with pravastatin and fish oil supplement significant changes were seen in TC (p < 0.02), TG (p < 0.03), LDL-C (p < 0.03), Apo A(1) (p < 0.04) and Apo B (p < 0.05) concentrations. There were no significant changes in HDL-C and Lp(a) concentrations. Renal function and cyclosporine levels were not changed during and after the study. CPK was increased only in one case. CONCLUSIONS: It is suggested that if the response to the diet is inadequate, the use of combined treatment with low-dose pravastatin and fish oil is a more effective strategy than the pravastatin treatment alone for changing the lipid profile after renal transplantation.

The effectiveness of mupirocin preventing Staphylococcus aureus in catheter-related infections in peritoneal dialysis.

The objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of mupirocin on Staphylococcus aureus with regard to peritoneal dialysis (PD)-catheter exit-site infections (ESI), tunnel infections (TI), and peritonitis episodes (PE). The study was performed on 42 continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) patients (group I) treated from April 1998 to July 1999. These patients were instructed to apply mupirocin daily at the catheter exit site as part of their exit-site care. The control was the same group's historical infection data. Results were also recorded for a second group of 16 patients (group II) with newly implanted PD catheters were also instructed to apply mupirocin at the exit site daily. During the control period (before daily mupirocin application), group I recorded 16 episodes of ESI (0.30 episodes per patient-year), 6 episodes of TI (0.11 episodes per patient-year), 15 episodes of PE (0.28 episodes per patient-year), and one case of catheter removal (0.019 episodes per patient-year) owing to S. aureus exit-site infection coexisting with peritonitis. The rate of S. aureus exit-site infection during this period was 0.11 episodes per patient-year; of S. aureus tunnel infection, 0.057 episodes per patient-year; and of S. aureus peritonitis, 0.076 episodes per patient-year. During the mupirocin period, infections and peritonitis owing to S. aureus dramatically decreased (p < 0.01 and p < 0.001 respectively). The rate of S. aureus exit-site infection was 0.02 episodes per patient-year, with no S. aureus tunnel infections, and no catheter removals owing to S. aureus peritonitis. Similarly, in group II, no episodes were recorded of any ESI, TI, or PE owing to S. aureus, although 4 episodes of ESI (0.37 episodes per patient-year, 2 with other gram-positive bacteria, and 2 with gram-negative bacteria) and 8 PEs (0.75 episodes per patient-year) were seen. We conclude that mupirocin application provides excellent prophylaxis for catheter-related infections owing to S. aureus, and that reduction of these infections may improve the long-term survival of patients on CAPD.

Hypertension in chronic hemodialysis patients: current view on pathophysiology and treatment.

BACKGROUND: Hypertension accounts for 65 - 85% of patients beginning dialysis, and dialysis alone controls hypertension in over 50% of patients. PATIENT AND METHODS: We have surveyed the status of BP control in 113 hemodialysis patients, 66 men and 47 women, aged 59 +/- 13 years old, with a mean duration on hemodialysis 42 +/- 44 months. The following measurements were recorded: predialysis mean arterial pressure (pre-MAP), post-dialysis MAP (post-MAP), percentage of change in MAP, pre-dialysis weight, post-dialysis weight, fluid removed by ultrafiltration during each dialysis session, interdialytic weight gain and excess weight over the desirable dry weight. RESULTS: Our results showed a hypertension prevalence of 59% (hypertension defined as pre-MAP +/- 110 mmHg). MAP was not different between men and women, and only 4.5% of patients had isolated systolic hypertension. All hypertensive patients were on treatment with antihypertensives. Reduction in post-MAP by > or = 5% (controlled by ultrafiltration) was found in 68.5% of hypertensive and in 87.5% of normotensive patients. Age, primary renal disease, time on dialysis and adequacy of dialysis were not correlated with pre-MAP. Excess volume and interdialytic weight gain were found to correlate with pre-MAP (p = 0.03). Also, the weekly dosage of EPO had a significant correlation with pre-MAP (p = 0.03). No differences were found among four classes of antihypertensive drugs regarding the BP control. Patients with hypertension requiring one drug achieved a significantly (p < 0.05) lower pre-MAP than the group of patients receiving three or more drugs. In conclusion, hemodialysis population shows high prevalence of hypertension, resistant to antihypertensive treatment. CONCLUSION: Current methods of hemodialysis are not effective in controlling BP. This implies that more insight into the role of excess volume and vasomotor systems in the pathogenesis of dialysis hypertension is warranted.